Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 359–375 | Cite as

Attentional Bias in Problem Gambling: A Systematic Review

  • Audhild Hønsi
  • Rune Aune Mentzoni
  • Helge Molde
  • Ståle Pallesen
Review Paper

Abstract

Attentional bias has been the subject of extensive empirical investigation in connection with chemical addictions, and it has been demonstrated in users of several different substances. The findings show that substance users seem to notice and attend to substance-related stimuli more readily than non-substance-related stimuli. Less is known, however, about attentional bias in pathological gambling. This systematic review investigates the existing empirical evidence on attentional bias in problem and pathological gamblers. Eleven studies were identified and evaluated following a literature search. Key findings are that problem and pathological gamblers seem to exhibit attentional bias toward gambling-related stimuli across different measuring paradigms, although some negative findings were reported. Recommendations aimed at improving research on this topic include better validation of measures, the inclusion of manipulations of craving level, and adding variations in gambling severity as a variable, as well as gambling preference. Research on therapeutic procedures aimed at reducing attentional bias is also recommended.

Keywords

Attention Attentional bias Problem gambling Addiction 

References

  1. Allport, A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 631–682). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  3. Andrew, J. W., Sayette, M., Franken, I. H. A., & Schwartz, J. E. (2005). Generalizability of carry-over effects in the emotional Stroop task. Behaviour Research and Therapy. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.06.003.Google Scholar
  4. Atkins, G., & Sharpe, L. (2003). Cognitive biases in problem gambling. Gambling Research: Journal of the National Association for Gambling Studies, 15(2), 35.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, T. B., Morse, E., & Sherman, J. E. (1986). The motivation to use drugs: A psychobiological analysis of urges. Nebraska Symposium of Motivation, 34, 257–323.Google Scholar
  6. Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00015.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyer, M., & Dickerson, M. (2003). Attentional bias and addictive behaviour: automaticity in a gambling‐specific modified Stroop task. Addiction, 98(1), 61–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradley, B. P., Garner, M., Hudson, L., & Mogg, K. (2007). Influence of negative affect on selective attention to smoking-related cues and urge to smoke in cigarette smokers. Behavioural Pharmacology, 18, 255–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brevers, D., Cleeremans, A., Bechara, A., Laloyaux, C., Kornreich, C., Verbanck, P., et al. (2011a). Time course of attentional bias for gambling information in problem gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. doi: 10.1037/a0024201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brevers, D., Cleeremans, A., Tibboel, H., Bechara, A., Kornreich, C., Verbanck, P., et al. (2011b). Reduced attentional blink for gambling-related stimuli in problem gamblers. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.01.005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cane, J. E., Sharma, D., & Albery, I. P. (2009). The addiction Stroop task: Examining the fast and slow effects of smoking and marijuana-related cues. Journal of Psychopharmacology. doi: 10.1177/0269881108091253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Cox, W. M., Fadardi, J. S., & Pothos, E. M. (2006). The addiction-Stroop test: Theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. Psychological Bulletin. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Crockford, D. N., Goodyear, B., Edwards, J., Quickfall, J., & El-Guebaly, N. (2005). Cue-induced brain activity in pathological gamblers. Biological Psychiatry. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.04.037.
  15. Diskin, K. M., & Hodgins, D. C. (1999). Narrowing of attention and dissociation in pathological video lottery gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15(1), 17–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diskin, K. M., & Hodgins, D. C. (2001). Narrowed focus and dissociative experiences in a community sample of experienced video lottery gamblers. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33(1), 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duka, T., & Townshend, J. M. (2004). The priming effect of alcohol pre-load on attentional bias to alcohol-related stimuli. Psychopharmacology (Berl). doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1906-7.Google Scholar
  18. Fadardi, J. S., & Cox, W. M. (2009). Reversing the sequence: Reducing alcohol consumption by overcoming alcohol attentional bias. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.11.015.
  19. Ferris, J., Wynne, H., & Single, E. (1999). Measuring problem gambling in Canada, final report: Phase I. Inter-Provincial Task Force on Problem Gambling, Canadian centre for Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  20. Field, M. (2010). Can’t take my eyes of you. The Psychologist, 23, 636–639.Google Scholar
  21. Field, M., & Cox, W. M. (2008). Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.030.Google Scholar
  22. Field, M., Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2005). Alcohol increases cognitive biases for smoking cues in smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-2251-1.Google Scholar
  23. Field, M., Mogg, K., Zetteler, J., & Bradley, B. P. (2004). Attentional biases for alcohol cues in heavy and light social drinkers: The roles of initial orienting and maintained attention. Psychopharmacology (Berl). doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-1855-1.Google Scholar
  24. Field, M., Munafò, M. R., & Franken, I. H. A. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse. Psychological Bulletin. doi: 10.1037/a0015843.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Field, M., & Powell, H. (2007). Stress increases attentional bias for alcohol cues in drinkers who drink to cope. Alcohol and Alcoholism. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agm064.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Franken, I. H. A. (2003). Drug craving and addiction: Integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. doi: 10.1016/S0278-5846(03)00081-2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hogarth, L., Dickinson, A., Janowski, M., Nikitina, A., & Duka, T. (2008). The role of attentional bias in mediating human drug-seeking behaviour. Psychopharmacology (Berl). doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1244-2.Google Scholar
  28. Klinger, E., & Cox, W. M. (2004). Motivation and the theory of current concern. In W. M. Cox & E. Klinger (Eds.), Handbook of motivational counseling: Concepts, approaches, and assessment (pp. 3–27). West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. LaBerge, D. (1995). Attentional processing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lubman, D. I., Allen, N. B., Peters, L. A., & Deakin, J. F. W. (2008). Electrophysiological evidence that drug cues have greater salience than other affective stimuli in opiate addiction. Journal of Psychopharmacology. doi: 10.1177/0269881107083846.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. McCusker, C. G. (2001). Cognitive biases and addiction: An evolution in theory and method. Addiction. doi: 10.1080/09652140020016950.Google Scholar
  32. McCusker, C. G., & Gettings, B. (1997). Automaticity of cognitive biases in addictive behaviours: Further evidence with gamblers. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36(4), 543–554.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller, M. A., & Fillmore, M. T. (2010). The effect of image complexity on attentional bias towards alcohol-related images in adult drinkers. Addiction. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02860.x.Google Scholar
  34. Molde, H., Pallesen, S., Sætrevik, B., Hammerborg, D., Laberg, J., & Johnsen, B. H. (2010). Attentional biases among pathological gamblers. International Journal of Gambling Studies. doi: 10.1080/14459791003652501.Google Scholar
  35. Myrseth, H., Brunborg, G. S., & Eidem, M. (2010). Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10899-010-9180-6.Google Scholar
  36. Namkoong, K., Lee, E., Lee, C. H., Lee, B. O., & An, S. K. (2004). Increased P3 amplitudes induced by alcohol-related pictures in patients with alcohol dependence. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000139828.78099.69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Noel, X., Colmant, M., Van Der Linden, M., Bechara, A., Bullens, Q., Hanak, C., et al. (2006). Time course of attention for alcohol cues in abstinent alcoholic patients: The role of initial orienting. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00224.x.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Petry, N. M., Stinson, F. S., & Grant, B. F. (2005). Comorbidity of DSM-IV PG and other psychiatric disorders: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66, 564–574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Phaf, R. H., & Kan, K. J. (2007). The automaticity of emotional Stroop: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Potenza, M. N. (2008). The neurobiology of pathological gambling and drug addiction: an overview and new findings. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0100.Google Scholar
  41. Ramond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. S. (2002). Pathological gambling: A comprehensive review. Clinical Psychology Review. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(02)00101-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Robbins, S. J., & Ehrman, R. N. (2004). The role of attentional bias in substance abuse. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews. doi: 10.1177/1534582305275423.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving—an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18(3), 247–291.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2008). The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: Some current issues. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0093.Google Scholar
  46. Rooke, S. E., Hine, D. W., & Thorsteinsson, E. B. (2008). Implicit cognition and substance use: A meta-analysis. Addictive Behaviors. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.06.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Schoenmakers, T. M., de Bruin, M., Lux, I. F. M., Goertz, A. G., Van Kerkhof, D. H. A. T., & Wiers, R. W. (2010). Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.11.022.
  48. Schoenmakers, T., Wiers, R. W., & Field, M. (2008). Effects of a low dose of alcohol on cognitive biases and craving in heavy drinkers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-1023-5.Google Scholar
  49. Stacy, A. W., & Wiers, R. W. (2010). Implicit cognition and addiction: A tool for explaining paradoxical behavior. Annual Reviews of Clinical Psychology. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131444.Google Scholar
  50. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tibboel, H., De Houwer, J., & Field, M. (2010). Reduced attentional blink for alcohol-related stimuli in heavy social drinkers. Journal of Psychopharmacology. doi: 10.1177/0269881109106977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Tibboel, H., De Houwer, J., Spruyt, A., Field, M., Kemps, E., & Crombez, G. (2011). Testing the validity of implicit measures of wanting and liking. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.01.002.Google Scholar
  53. Tiffany, S. T. (1990). A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: Role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychological Review, 97(2), 147–168.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. van Holst, R., van den Brink, W., Veltman, D., & Goudriaan, A. (2010). Why gamblers fail to win: A review of cognitive and neuroimaging findings in pathological gambling. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.07.007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Waters, A. J., Heishman, S. J., Lerman, C., & Pickworth, W. (2007). Enhanced identification of smoking-related words during the attentional blink in smokers. Addictive Behaviors. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.016.Google Scholar
  56. Wölfling, K., Mörsen, C. P., Duven, E., Albrecht, U., Grüsser, S. M., & Flor, H. (2011). To gamble or not to gamble: At risk for craving and relapse—learned motivated attention in pathological gambling. Biological Psychology. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.03.010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Zack, M., & Poulos, C. X. (2004). Amphetamine primes motivation to gamble and gambling-related semantic networks in problem gamblers. Neuropsychopharmacology. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300333.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Zack, M., & Poulos, C. X. (2007). A D2 antagonist enhances the rewarding and priming effects of a gambling episode in pathological gamblers. Neuropsychopharmacology. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301295.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Audhild Hønsi
    • 1
  • Rune Aune Mentzoni
    • 1
  • Helge Molde
    • 1
  • Ståle Pallesen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychosocial ScienceUniversity of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations