Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 289–309 | Cite as

Gamblers’ Habits: Empirical Evidence on the Behavior of Regulars, Newcomers and Dropouts

  • Ingo Fiedler
Original Paper


Electronic gambling offers the opportunity to analyze huge and unbiased data sets of automatically recorded actual gambling behavior. This study refers to data on 2,127,887 poker playing identities from the Online Poker Database of the University of Hamburg (OPD-UHH) to analyze three subgroups of gamblers: regulars, newcomers, and dropouts. Their gambling habits over 6 months are analyzed in total, as well as over time. Regulars show a much higher involvement than non-regulars and increase their playing volume slightly over the observation period. Newcomers have a lower involvement than non-newcomers and most of them decrease their playing volume over time. Still, there is a small group of newcomers which increases their playing volume sharply and is, hence, very interesting for the industry as well as for the early prevention of pathological gambling. Dropouts have a higher gambling involvement than newcomers but play less than players who have not stopped stop gambling. Most dropouts also show a decreasing playing volume before dropping out. An analysis of the correlations between different variables of gambling habits shows that most of them reinforce each other, for example: gamblers with a higher total playing time tend to play at more tables simultaneously. Only playing frequency is a moderating variable of gambling involvement.


Online Poker Gambling Habits Behavior 


  1. Becker, G. S., & Murphy, K. M. (1988). A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy, 96(4), 675–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braverman, J., & Shaffer, H. J. (2012). How do gamblers start gambling: Identifying behavioral markers for high-risk internet gambling. European Journal of Public Health, 22(2), 273–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broda, A., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., LaBrie, R. A., Bosworth, L. B., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Virtual harm reduction efforts for Internet gambling: Effects of deposit limits on actual Internet sports gambling behavior. Harm Reduction Journal, 5, 27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cunningham-Williams, R. M., Gruczaa, R. A., Cottler, L. B., Womack, S. B., Books, S. J., Przybeck, T. R., et al. (2005). Prevalence and predictors of pathological gambling: Results from the St. Louis Personality, Health and Lifestyle (SLPHL) study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 39(4), 377–390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fiedler, I. (2012). The gambling habits of online poker players. The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, in print.Google Scholar
  6. Fiedler, I., & Rock, J.-P. (2009). Quantifying skill in games—theory and empirical evidence for poker. Gaming Law Review and Economics, 13, 50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fiedler, I., & Wilcke, A.-C. (2012). The market for online poker. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 16, 5–18.Google Scholar
  8. LaBrie, R. A., Kaplan, S. A., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Inside the virtual casino: A prospective longitudinal study of actual Internet casino gambling. European Journal of Public Health, 18(4), 410–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. LaBrie, R. A., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., Schumann, A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2007). Assessing the playing field: A prospective longitudinal study of Internet sports gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 347–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2011). Identifying behavioral markers of disordered Internet sports gambling. Addiction Research, & Theory, 19(1), 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. LaPlante, D. A., Kleschinsky, J. H., LaBrie, R. A., Nelson, S. E., & Shaffer, H. J. (2009). Sitting at the virtual poker table: A prospective epidemiological study of actual Internet poker gambling behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 711–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. LaPlante, D. A., Schumann, A., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Population trends in Internet sports gambling. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 2399–2414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lesieur, H. R. (1977). The chase: Career of the compulsive gambler. Oxford: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
  14. Meyer, G., & Bachmann, M. (2005). Spielsucht. Ursachen und therapie. Heidelberg: Springer Medizin Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Nelson, S. E., LaPlante, D. A., Peller, A. J., Schumann, A., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Real limits in the virtual world: Self-limiting behavior of Internet gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(4), 463–477.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Smith, G., Levere, M., & Kurtzman, R. (2009). Poker player behavior after big wins and big losses. Management Science, 55(9), 1547–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stinchfield, R., Govoni, R., & Frisch, G. R. (2007). A review of screening and assessment instruments for problem and pathological gambling. In G. Smith, D. C. Hodgins, & R. J. Williams (Eds.), Research and Measurement Issues in gambling studies. Burlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Xuan, Z., & Shaffer, H. J. (2009). How do gamblers end gambling: Longitudinal analysis of Internet gambling behaviors prior to account closure due to gambling related problems. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25(2), 239–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Law and Economics at the University of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations