Examining Gender Differences for Gambling Engagement and Gambling Problems Among Emerging Adults
- 1.1k Downloads
Gambling is fast becoming a public health problem in the United States, especially among emerging adults (18–25 year olds). Since 1995, rates have recently doubled with around 7–11 % of the emerging adult population having problems with gambling (Shaffer et al. in Am J Public Health 89(9):1369–1376, 1999; Cyders and Smith in Pers Individ Diff 45(6):503–508, 2008). Some states have lowered their gambling age to 18 years old; in turn, the gambling industry has recently oriented their market to target this younger population. However, little is known about the gender variation and the factors placing emerging adults at risk for getting engaged and developing problems with gambling. The purpose of the study was to determine the risk factors accounting for gender differences at the two levels of gambling involvement: engagement and problems. Mediation analyses revealed that impulsive coping and risk-taking were significant partial mediators for gender differences on engagement in gambling. Men took more risks and had lower levels of impulsive coping than women, and those who took more risks and had lower levels of impulsive coping were more likely to engage in gambling. Risk-taking and social anxiety were the significant mediators for gender differences in problems with gambling. Men took more risks and were more socially anxious than women, and greater risk-taking and more socially anxious individuals tended to have more problems with gambling. Implications for counseling preventions and intervention strategies are discussed.
KeywordsGender differences Gambling Risk factors for gambling Addiction among emerging adults
The author wishes to thank her advisor, Nolan Zane, and all her colleagues at the Asian American Center on Disparities Research. This study was fully supported by the Asian American Center on Disparities Research (National Institute of Mental Health grant: P50MH073511).
- American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. doi: 10.1037/11381-000.
- Arnett, J (2005). The developmental context of substance use in emerging adulthood. Journal of Drug Issues. Special Issue: Still at Risk for Substance Abuse: Transitions, Risks, and Opportunities for Prevention of Drug Abuse During Emerging Adulthood, 35(2), 235–254. doi: 0022-0426/05/02 235-254.
- Baer, J. S. (2002). Student factors: Understanding individual variation in college pdrinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement, 14, 40–53. http://www.collegedrinkingprevention.gov/media/Journal/040_090.pdf.
- Brady, K., & Hartwell, K. (2004). Gender, anxiety, and substance use disorders. Women and Addiction: A Comprehensive Handbook. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Carland, J., Carland, J., & Stewart, W. (1996). Seeing what’s not there: The enigma of entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 7(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
- Dalton, W., I. I. I., Klesges, L., Henderson, L., Somes, G., Robinson, L., & Johnson, K. (2010). Gender, smoking status, and risk behavior attitudes explain adolescents’ patterns of nicotine replacement therapy use. Addictive Behaviors, 35(2), 147–151. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.09.024.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dong-mei, Y., Ming-yi, Q., & Xing-hua, L. (2007). Revision of social interaction anxiety scale and social phobia scale. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2007-02.Google Scholar
- Eriksson, K., & Simpson, B. (2010). Emotional reactions to losing explain gender differences in risky behavior. Journal of Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 159–163.Google Scholar
- Gustafson, P. (1998). Gender differences in risk perception: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. Risk Analysis, 18(6). doi: 10.1023/B:RIAN.0000005926.03250.co.
- Harris, C., Jenkins, M., & Glaser, D. (2006). Gender differences in risk assessment: Why do women take fewer risks than men? Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 48–63.Google Scholar
- Hedman, E., Andersson, G., Ljotsson, B., Andersson, E., Ruck, C., Mortberg, E., et al. (2011). Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy vs. cognitive behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. PLoS ONE, 6(3), e18001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jacobs, D. (1989). Illegal and undocumented: A review of teenage gambling and the plight of children of problem gamblers in America. Compulsive gambling: Theory, research, and practice. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Kahler, C., Hoeppner, B., & Dristina, J. (2009). A Rasch model analysis of alcohol consumption and problems across adolescence and young adulthood. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 33(4), 663–673. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00881.x.
- Kaminer, V., & Petry, N. (1999). Gambling behavior in youths: Why we should be concerned. Alcohol and Drug Abuse, 50(2), 167–168.Google Scholar
- Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2001). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests [online]. Available: http://www.unc.edu/~preacher/sobel/sobel.htm.
- Regier, D., Rae, D., Narrow, W., Kaelber, C., & Schatzberg, A. (1998). Prevalence of anxiety disorders and their comorbidity with mood and addictive disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 173(34), 24–28.Google Scholar
- Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., & Maestripieri, D. (2009). Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(36), 15268–15273. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907352106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shaffer, H., & Hall, M. (2001). Updating and refining prevalence estimates of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 92(30), 168–172.Google Scholar
- Sibley, C., & Harre, N. (2008). The impact of different styles of traffic safety advertisement on young drivers’ explicit and implicit self-enhancement biases. Transportation Research Part F, 12(2009), 159–167.Google Scholar
- Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
- Watson, D., Weber, K., Assenheimer, J. S., Clark, L. A., Strauss, M. E., & McCormick, R. A. (1995). Testing a tripartite model: I. Evaluating the convergent and discriminant validity of anxiety and depression symptom scales. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104(1), 3–14. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.104.1.3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xu, Y., Schneier, F., Heimberg, R., Princisvalle, K., Liebowitz, M., Wang, S., et al. (2012). Gender differences in social anxiety disorder: Results from the national epidemiologic sample on alcohol and related conditions. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26(1), 12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.08.006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zane, N. & Huh-Kim, J. (2005). Addictive behaviors. In Readings in Asian American psychology. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Zane, N., Song, A., Lee, A., & Chan, A. (in press). Ethnic variations in gambling among Asian American and White American college students. Asian American Journal of Psychology. Google Scholar
- Zuckerman, M. (2009). Sensation seeking. In Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 455–465). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar