Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 691–701 | Cite as

Sympathetic Magic and Gambling: Adherence to the Law of Contagion Varies with Gambling Severity

  • Moira Teed
  • Karen A. Finlay
  • Harvey H. C. Marmurek
  • Scott R. Colwell
  • Ian R. Newby-Clark
Original Paper

Abstract

This study assessed adherence to the law of contagion by 118 undergraduate students (39 males). Participants were students who played a slot machine game after viewing a prior player who seemed to be winning (“lucky” condition) or losing (“unlucky” condition). Adherence to the law of contagion was assessed by the selection of the coin holder used by a “lucky” prior player and the avoidance of the coin holder used by an “unlucky” prior player. Contagion varied directly with scores on the Problem Gambling Severity Index and scores on the Luck/Perseverance subscale of the Gamblers’ Belief Questionnaire (Steenbergh et al. in Psychol Addict Behav 16(2):143–149, 2002). Gamblers high in problem severity chose the “lucky” coin holder and avoided the “unlucky” coin holder significantly more than gamblers low in problem severity. Problem gamblers, therefore, exhibit evidence of magical thinking related to the transfer of a “lucky” essence. The same was the case for individuals with a strong level of belief that sheer continuation in gambling (luck perseverance) results in success and for individuals who believe that luck is a personal rather than a situational characteristic. All three variables (problem gambling severity, luck perseverance and personal luck) had direct effects on behavior reflecting irrational magical thinking. A belief that knowledge or skill has a role in successful gaming was unrelated to magical thinking. These findings suggest potential foci for cognitive interventions with problem gamblers and those with non-skill based evidence of irrational thinking.

Keywords

Sympathetic magic Personal luck Law of contagion Irrational thinking Problem gambling 

References

  1. Bolen, D. W., & Boyd, W. H. (1968). Gambling and the gambler: A review and preliminary findings. Archives of General Psychiatry, 18, 617–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Darke, P. R., & Freedman, J. L. (1997). The belief in good luck scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 486–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  4. Finlay, K. A., Marmurek, H. H. C., Kanetkar, V., & Londerville, J. (2010). Casino decor effects on gambling emotions and intentions. Environment and Behavior, 42(4), 524–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Letarte, H., Giroux, I., & Jacques, C. (1998). Cognitive treatment of pathological gamblers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 1111–1119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Linnet, J., Gebauer, L., Shaffer, H., Mouridsen, K., & Møller, A. (2010). Experienced poker players differ from inexperienced poker players in estimation bias and decision bias. Journal of Gambling Issues, 24, 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McComb, J. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2009). Problem gambling on college campuses. NASPA Journal, 46, 1–29.Google Scholar
  8. Rozin, P., Grant, H., Weinberg, S., & Parker, S. (2007). Head versus heart: Effect of monetary frames on expressions of sympathetic magic concerns. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 217–224.Google Scholar
  9. Rozin, P., Markwith, M., & Nemeroff, C. (1992). Magical contagion beliefs and the fear of AIDS. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1081–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rozin, P., & Nemeroff, C. (2002). Sympathetic magical thinking: The contagion and similarity “heuristics”. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 201–217). Cambridge UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Steenbergh, T. A., Meyers, A. W., May, R. K., & Whelan, J. P. (2002). Development and validation of the gamblers’ beliefs questionnaire. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(2), 143–149.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wohl, M. J., & Enzle, M. E. (2002). The deployment of personal luck: Sympathetic magic and illusionary control in games of pure chance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1388–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wohl, M. J., Stewart, M. J., & Young, M. M. (2011). Personal Luck Usage Scale (PLUS): Psychometric validation of a measure of gambling-related belief in luck as a personal possession. International Gambling Studies, 11(1), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Moira Teed
    • 1
  • Karen A. Finlay
    • 1
  • Harvey H. C. Marmurek
    • 1
  • Scott R. Colwell
    • 1
  • Ian R. Newby-Clark
    • 1
  1. 1.University of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations