Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 515–540 | Cite as

Assessing Corporate Social Responsibility in China’s Sports Lottery Administration and Its Influence on Consumption Behavior

  • Hai Li
  • James J. Zhang
  • Luke Lunhua Mao
  • Sophia D. Min
Original Paper

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify and examine consumer perception of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in China’s sports lottery industry, and the effect of perceived CSR initiatives on sports lottery consumption behavior. Research participants (N = 4,980), selected based on a computer-generated, randomly stratified multistage sampling process, comprised Chinese residents who had purchased sports lottery tickets in the past 12 months. They completed a questionnaire that was derived from a qualitative research process. A factor analysis extracted two factors associated with perceptions of CSR in China’s sports lottery administration: Regulatory and Prevention Responsibilities and Product Development Responsibility. Logistic regression analyses revealed that these two factors were influential of consumer behavior (i.e., relative and absolute expenditure, purchasing frequency, and time commitment). This study represents an initial effort to understand the dimensions of perceived CSR associated with Chinese sports lottery. The findings signify the importance of enforcing CSR in sports lottery administration.

Keywords

Consumer well-being Sports gamble China market Corporate social responsibility Problem gambling 

References

  1. Abt, V., Smith, J. F., & Christiansen, E. M. (1985). The business of risk: Commercial gambling in mainstream America. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
  2. American Gaming Association. (2009). Gaming revenue: Current-year data. Retrieved December 20, 2010, from http://www.americangaming.org/Industry/factsheets/statistics.
  3. Aupperle, K. E. (1982). An empirical inquiry into the social responsibilities as defined by corporations: An examination of various models and relationships. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
  4. Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 446–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaszczynski, A. (2001). Harm minimization strategies in gambling: An overview of international initiatives and interventions. Melbourne: Australian Gaming Council.Google Scholar
  8. Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Shaffer, H. (2004). A science-based framework for responsible gambling: The Reno Model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 301–317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blomqvist, K. (1997). The many faces of trust. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(3), 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  11. Buchanan, J., & Johnson, L. W. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and the gaming industry: A contradiction in terms? Paper presented at Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  12. Business in the Community. (1997). Cause related marketing corporate survey report and cause related marketing consumer research. Available from www.BITC.uk.org.
  13. Camelot. (2009). Camelot corporate responsibility review 2009. Available from www.camelotgroup.co.uk/crreport2009/docs/Camelot_CR_Review_final.pdf.
  14. Carroll, A. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.Google Scholar
  15. Carroll, A. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cattell, R. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. China Financial and Economic Publishing House. (2007, 2008, 2009). China Lottery Almanac 2007, 2008, 2009. Beijing: China Financial and Economic Publishing House.Google Scholar
  18. China Sports Lottery Administration Center. (2011). Annual report and accounts 2010. Available from http://www.lottery.gov.cn/events/2010/Default.aspx.
  19. Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for he the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Cone Inc. (1999). Americans do good by shopping with a cause in mind. Available from http://www.coneinc.com.
  22. Cornish, D. B. (1978). Gambling: A review of the literature and its implications for policy and research. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  23. Cotrill, M. T. (1990). Corporate social responsibility and the marketplace. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 723–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Crowther, D. (2003). Corporate social reporting: genuine action or window dressing? In D. Crowther & L. Rayman-Bacchus (Eds.), Perspectives on corporate social responsibility (pp. 140–160). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  25. Cui, G., & Liu, Q. (2000). Regional market segments of China: Opportunities and barriers in a big emerging market. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(1), 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Davis, K. (1967). Understanding the social responsibility puzzle: What does the businessman owe to society? Business Horizons, 10, 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. De Bakker, F. G. A., Groenewegen, P., & den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business and Society, 44(3), 283–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dickerson, M. G. (1993). A preliminary exploration of a two-stage methodology in the assessment of the extent and degree of gambling-related problems in the Australian population. In W. R. Eadington & J. A. Cornelius (Eds.), Gambling behavior and gambling problem (pp. 347–364). Reno, NV: Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming.Google Scholar
  29. Diskin, K. M., & Hodgins, D. C. (1999). Narrowing of attention and dissociation in pathological video lottery gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 17–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eadington, W. (2003). Trends in gambling and responsible gambling in the United States and elsewhere. Available from www.unr.edu/gaming.
  31. Freedman, M., & Jaggi, B. (1986). An analysis of the impact of corporate pollution disclosures included in annual financial statements on investors decisions. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 1, 193–212.Google Scholar
  32. Freeman, R. E., & Liedtka, J. (1991). Corporate social responsibility: A critical approach–Corporate social responsibility no longer a useful concept. Business Horizons, 34, 92–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  34. Gala Coral. (2006). Corporate social responsibility strategy. Available from www.galacoral.co.uk/Files/CSR_2006.pdf.
  35. Gambling Commission. (2010). Annual report and accounts 2009/10. Available from www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk.
  36. Gao, Y. (2009). Corporate social performance in China: Evidence from large companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. General Administration of Sport of China. (1998). Provisional regulations on administration of public welfare fund collected from sports lottery. Available from http://www.sport.gov.cn.
  39. Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  40. Griffiths, M. (1993). Fruit machine gambling: The Importance of structural characteristics. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(2), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Griffiths, M. (1995). Towards a risk factor model of fruit machine addiction: A brief note. Journal of Gambling Studies, 11(3), 343–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Griffiths, M. (2003). Internet gambling: Issues, concerns, and recommendations. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 6(6), 557–568.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Griffiths, M., & Parke, J. (2002). The social impact of internet gambling. Social Science Computer Review, 20(3), 312–320.Google Scholar
  44. Griffiths, M., & Wood, R. T. A. (2000). Risk factors in adolescence: The case of gambling, videogame playing, and the Internet. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(2/3), 199–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Griffiths, M., & Wood, R. T. A. (2001). The psychology of lottery gambling. International Gambling Studies, 1, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19(2), 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Black, W. C., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  48. Hancock, L., Schellinck, T., & Schrans, T. (2008). Gambling and corporate social responsibility (CSR): re-defining industry and state roles on duty of care, host responsibility and risk management. Policy and Society, 27, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Harris, I. A., Khoo, O. K., Young, J. M., Solomon, M. J., & Rae, H. (2008). Lottery incentives did not improve response rate to a mailed survey: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(6), 609–610.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hing, N. (2000). Changing fortunes: Past, present and future perspectives on the management of problem gambling by new south wales registered clubs. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Western Sydney—Macarthur.Google Scholar
  51. Hing, N. (2001). Changing the odds: A study of corporate social principles and practices in addressing problem gambling. Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hing, N. (2006). A history of machine gambling in the NSW club industry: From community benefit to commercialisation. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Administration, 7(2/3), 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hing, N., & Mackellar, J. (2004). Challenges in responsible provision of gambling: Questions of efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency. UNLV Gaming Research and Review Journal, 8(1), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hing, N., & McMillen, J. (2002). A conceptual framework of the corporate management of social impacts: The case of problem gambling. Business and Society Review, 107, 457–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hong Kong Jockey Club. (2010). Annual report for the year ended 30 June 2010. Available from http://www.hkjc.com/home/english/index.asp.
  56. Idowu, S. O., & Towler, B. A. (2004). A comparative study of the contents of corporate social responsibility reports of UK companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 15(4), 420–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jones, P., Hillier, D., & Comfort, D. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in the UK gambling industry. Corporate Governance, 9(2), 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kaiser, H. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kalantar, J. S., & Talley, N. J. (1999). The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: A randomized study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52, 1117–1122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kedia, B., & Kuntz, E. C. (1981). The context of social performance: An empirical study of Texas banks. Research in corporate social performance and policy, 3, 133–154.Google Scholar
  61. Korn, D., & Shaffer, H. (1999). Gambling and the health of the public: Adopting a public health perspective. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 289–365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ladbrokes. (2009). Corporate responsibility report 2009. Available from http://www.annualreport-2009.ladbrokesplc.com/business-review/corporate-responsibility.aspx#Our.
  63. LaFleur, T., & LaFleur, B. (2010). LaFleur’s 2010 world lottery almanac. Boyds: TLF.Google Scholar
  64. Lerner, L. D., & Fryxell, G. E. (1988). An empirical study of the predictors of corporate social performance: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 7, 951–959.Google Scholar
  65. Lottomatica Group. (2009). Lottomatica Group 2009 social report. Available from www.lottomaticagroup.com/eng/social/sr_02bilancio.html.
  66. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). Social enterprise series no. 19—Misery loves companies: Whither social initiatives by business? Harvard Business School Working Paper Series, No. 01-058.Google Scholar
  67. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Miers, D. (2008). Gambling in Great Britain: Implementing a social responsibility agenda. Gaming Law Review and Economics, 12(6), 583–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mohr, L. A., & Webb, D. J. (2005). The Effect of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), 121–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Moran, E. (1979). An assessment of the report of the royal commission on gambling 1976–1978. British Journal of Addiction, 74, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Moran, E. (1987). Gambling among schoolchildren: The impact of the fruit machine. London: National Council on Gambling.Google Scholar
  72. Neville, B. A., Bell, S. J., & Menguec, B. (2005). Corporate reputation, stakeholders and the social performance–financial performance relationship. European Journal of Marketing, 39(9/10), 1184–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nieminen, R. (2006). Sports betting and social responsibility. European State Lotteries and Toto Association, 22, 6.Google Scholar
  74. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  75. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Parke, J., & Griffiths, M. (2006). The psychology of the fruit machine: The role of structural characteristics (Revisited). International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 4(2), 151–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pivato, S., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2008). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: the case of organic food. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pomering, A., & Dolniar, S. (2009). Assessing the prerequisite of successful CSR implementation: Are consumers aware of CSR initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics, 85(Supplement 2), 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pratten, J. D., & Walton, S. (2009). Policy and reality: Corporate social responsibility in the UK gambling industry. Corporate Responsibility Research Conference 2008. Queen’s Discussion Paper Series on Corporate Responsibility Research no. 6.Google Scholar
  80. Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s gambling industries. Report No. 10, AusInfo, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  81. Ramasamy, B., & Yeung, M. (2009). Chinese consumers’ perception of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Raylu, N., & Oei, T. (2004). Role of culture in gambling and problem gambling. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1087–1114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Robertson, J., Walkom, E. J., & McGettigan, P. (2005). Response rates and representativeness: A lottery incentive improves physician return rates. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 14, 571–577.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rockness, J., Schlachter, P., & Rockness, H. O. (1986). Hazardouswaste disposal, corporate disclosure, and financial performance in the chemical industry. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 1, 167–191.Google Scholar
  85. Scholtens, B. (2008). A note on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Ecological Economics, 68, 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Shaffer, H., Dickerson, M., Derevensky, J., Winters, K., George, E., Karlins, M., et al. (2001). Editorial—Considering the ethics of public claims: an appeal for scientific maturity. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(1), 1–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Shaffer, H. J., & Korn, D. A. (2002). Gambling and related mental disorders: A public health analysis. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 171–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Siegel, D. S., & Vitaliano, D. F. (2007). An empirical analysis of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16(3), 773–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Simpson, W. G., & Kohers, T. (2002). The link between corporate social and financial performance: evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(2), 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Skinner, G. W. (2002). Marketing and social structure in rural China. Ann Arbor, Mich: Association for Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  92. Smeaton, M., & Griffiths, M. (2004). Internet gambling and social responsibility: An exploratory study. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 7(1), 49–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Smith, G. (2009). Sports betting in Canada. International Sports Law Journal, 1–2, 106–111.Google Scholar
  94. Smith, G., & Rubenstein, D. (2009). Accountability and social responsibility in Ontario’s legal gambling regime. Final Report to Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre (OPGRC), pp. 34–55.Google Scholar
  95. Thomas, J. R., Nelson, J. K., & Silverman, S. J. (2005). Research methods in physical activity (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  96. Thompson, D. (2009). Camelot Stakeholder Report 2008/09. Camelot Group, 5.Google Scholar
  97. Tian, Z., Wang R., & Yang W. (2011). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) in China. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0716-6.
  98. Tsoutsoura, M. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Center for Responsible Business. Working Paper Series. Paper 7. University of California. http://www.repositories.cdlib.org/crb/wps/7.
  99. Vassilikopoulou, A. I., Siomkos, G. J., & Mylonakis, J. (2005). Clustering consumers according to their attitudes on corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(4), 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Veikkaus (2009). Veikkaus’ Year: CSR report annual report. Available from https://www.veikkaus.fi/idc/groups/corporate/documents/document/vuosiraportti_e_09.pdf.
  101. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wang, X. (2008). Policy alternatives for the development of China’s gaming industry. Beijing: China Financial and Economic.Google Scholar
  103. Weinstein, D., & Deitch, L. (1974). The impact of legalized gambling: The socioeconomic consequences of lotteries and off-track betting. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  104. Youn, S., & Kim, H. (2008). Antecedents of consumer attitudes toward cause-related marketing. Journal of Advertising Research, 48(1), 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hai Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • James J. Zhang
    • 1
    • 3
  • Luke Lunhua Mao
    • 4
  • Sophia D. Min
    • 3
  1. 1.Sport Events Research Center, School of Sport Economics and ManagementShanghai University of SportShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Tourism, Recreation and Sport Management, 300 FLG—College of Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Kinesiology College of EducationUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  4. 4.Department of Tourism, Recreation and Sport Management College of Health and Human PerformanceUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations