A Focus Group Study of Predictors of Relapse in Electronic Gaming Machine Problem Gambling, Part 2: Factors that ‘Pull’ the Gambler Away from Relapse
- 348 Downloads
This study aimed to develop an empirically based description of relapse in Electronic Gaming Machine (EGM) problem gambling (PG) by describing the processes and factors that ‘pull’ the problem gambler away from relapse contrasted with the ‘push’ towards relapse. These conceptualisations describe two opposing, interacting emotional processes occurring within the problem gambler during any relapse episode. Each relapse episode comprises a complex set of psychological and social behaviours where many factors interact sequentially and simultaneously within the problem gambler to produce a series of mental and behaviour events that end (1) with relapse where ‘push’ overcomes ‘pull’ or (2) continued abstinence where ‘pull’ overcomes ‘push’. Four focus groups comprising thirty participants who were EGM problem gamblers, gamblers’ significant others, therapists and counsellors described their experiences and understanding of relapse. The groups were recorded, recordings were then transcribed and analysed using thematic textual analysis. It was established that vigilance, motivation to commit to change, positive social support, cognitive strategies such as remembering past gambling harms or distraction techniques to avoid thinking about gambling to enable gamblers to manage the urge to gamble and urge extinction were key factors that protected against relapse. Three complementary theories emerged from the analysis. Firstly, a process of reappraisal of personal gambling behaviour pulls the gambler away from relapse. This results in a commitment to change that develops over time and affects but is independent of each episode of relapse. Secondly, relapse may be halted by interacting factors that ‘pull’ the problem gambler away from the sequence of mental and behavioural events, which follow the triggering of the urge and cognitions to gamble. Thirdly, urge extinction and apparent ‘cure’ is possible for EGM gambling. This study provides a qualitative, empirical model for understanding protective factors against gambling relapse.
KeywordsPathological and problem gambling Relapse Predictors Focus group Protective factors Qualitative research Recovery Management ‘Pull’
The researchers would like to acknowledge Gambling Research Australia (GRA) who has commissioned this study and the support from the Office for Problem Gambling, Department for Families and Communities South Australia during the period of this study. We thank the participants who gave freely of their time and to our colleagues in the Statewide Gambling Therapy Service (SGTS) who provided excellent support in recruitment and follow up. We would also like to acknowledge the assistance and support of Gambling Helpline, Relationships Australia, Pokies Anonymous and OARS in recruitment and ongoing support for the follow up of Participants.
- Abbott, M., Volberg, R., Bellringer, M., & Reith, G. (2004). A review of research aspects of problem gambling. Auckland: Auckland University of Technology.Google Scholar
- Battersby, M., Pols, R., Oakes, J., Smith, D., McLaughlin, K., & Baigent, M. (2009). The definition and predictors of relapse in problem gambling. From http://www.gamblingresearch.org.au.
- Gamblers Anonymous. (2009). Gamblers anonymous. From http://www.gansw.org.au/index.htm. Retrieved 2 Jan 2010.
- Gernstein, D., Hoffman, J., Larison, C., Engelman, L., Murphy, S., Palmer, A., et al. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study report to the national gambling impact study commission. New York: National Opinion Research Centre at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
- Goudriaan, A., Oosterlaan, J., De Beurs, E., & Van Den Brink, W. (2008). The role of self-reported impulsivity and reward sensitivity versus neurocognitive measures of disinhibition and decision-making in the prediction of relapse in pathological gamblers. Psychological Medicine, 38(1), 41–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). An expanded source book. Qualitative data analysis, London (2nd ed.). New Dehli: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Oakes, J., Pols, R., Battersby, M., Lawn, S., Pulvirenti, M., & Smith, D. (2011). A focus group study of predictors of relapse in electronic gaming machine problem gambling, part 1: Factors that ‘push’ towards relapse. Journal Gambling Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10899-011-9264-y.
- Pokies Anonymous. (2010). From http://www.hotfrog.com.au/Companies/Pokies-Anonymous. Retrieved 11 Feb 2010.
- Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s gambling industries (report no. 10). Canberra: AusInfo.Google Scholar
- Rutter, M. (1985). Resilience in the face of adversity: Protective factors and resistance to psychiatric disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 598–611.Google Scholar
- Stein, S., Eadington, W., & Cornelius, J. (1993). The role of support in recovery from compulsive gambling. Gambling Behavior and Problem Gambling, 15, 627–640.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Thomas, S., & Jackson, A. (2008). Report to the department of justice. Risk and protective factors in problem gambling University of Melbourne. Monarsh: Monarsh University and the Victorian Government.Google Scholar
- Thygesen, L., & Hodgins, D. (2003). Quitting again: Motivations and strategies for terminating gambling relapses. eGambling The Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue9v1/research/thygesen/index.html.