Is Executive Cognitive Function Associated with Youth Gambling?
- 394 Downloads
Our objectives for this report were to identify trajectories of youth gambling behavior, and to examine their relation to executive cognitive function (ECF) and associated problem behaviors. Philadelphia school children, enrolled at ages 10–12 years (n = 387; 49% male), completed three annual assessments of risk behaviors, ECF, impulsivity, problem behaviors and demographics. Across ages 10–15 years, using methods from Nagin et al., two groups were identified: Early Gamblers (n = 111) initiated early and continued in later assessments, and Later Gamblers (n = 276) initiated at later ages and gambled less. Betting money on cards and sports were the most frequently reported gambling behaviors. Using gambling group as outcome, final backward selection logistic regression model showed Early Gamblers are more likely male (P = 0.001), report more active coping (P = 0.042), impulsive behaviors (P ≤ 0.008), and have friends who gamble (P = 0.001). Groups were similar in ECF, parental monitoring, marital status, SES, and race. Early Gamblers had higher incidence of problem behaviors and drug use (all P ≤ 0.006). Two gambling groups were identified in early adolescence with Early Gamblers showing higher levels of impulsivity and comorbid problems but similar levels of ECF compared to Late Gamblers. As more gambling groups are identified through later adolescence, ECF may emerge as a relevant precursor of problem gambling at this later time.
KeywordsYouth gambling Trajectories Executive cognitive function Impulsivity Adolescence
The project described was supported by Grant Numbers R01DA018913 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse and UL1-RR-024134 from the National Center for Research Resources. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
- Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003). 2003 state and local youth behavior survey. http://www.cdc.gov.
- Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, J. (2000). Youth gambling: A clinical and research perspective. e-Gambling: The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues, 2, 1–10.Google Scholar
- Jarvis, B. (2004). MediaLab (Version 2004.2.87). New York: Empirisoft.Google Scholar
- Johnston, L. D., Bachman, J. G., & O’Malley, P. M. (2006). Monitoring the future: Questionnaire responses from the nation’s high school seniors. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
- Jones, B. L., Nagin, D. S., & Roeder, K. (1998). A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories: available at www.stat.cmu.edu/~bjones/traj.html.
- Metzger, D. S., Koblin, B., Turner, C., Navaline, H., Valenti, F., Holte, S., et al. (2000). Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: Utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. HIVNET Vaccine Preparedness Study Protocol Team. American Journal of Epidemiology, 152(2), 99–106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Romer, D. (2003). Reducing adolescent risk toward an integrated approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Romer, D., Betancourt, L. M., Brodsky, N. L., Giannetta, J. M., Yang, W., & Hurt, H. (2011). Does adolescent risk taking imply weak executive function? A prospective study of relations between working memory performance, impulsivity, and risk taking in early adolescence. Developmental Science, in press.Google Scholar
- Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (2003). The Wechsler intelligence scale for children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar