Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 565–573 | Cite as

Responsible Gambling: General Principles and Minimal Requirements

  • Alex Blaszczynski
  • Peter Collins
  • Davis Fong
  • Robert Ladouceur
  • Lia Nower
  • Howard J. Shaffer
  • Hermano Tavares
  • Jean-Luc Venisse
Original Paper

Abstract

Many international jurisdictions have introduced responsible gambling programs. These programs intend to minimize negative consequences of excessive gambling, but vary considerably in their aims, focus, and content. Many responsible gambling programs lack a conceptual framework and, in the absence of empirical data, their components are based only on general considerations and impressions. This paper outlines the consensus viewpoint of an international group of researchers suggesting fundamental responsible gambling principles, roles of key stakeholders, and minimal requirements that stakeholders can use to frame and inform responsible gambling programs across jurisdictions. Such a framework does not purport to offer value statements regarding the legal status of gambling or its expansion. Rather, it proposes gambling-related initiatives aimed at government, industry, and individuals to promote responsible gambling and consumer protection. This paper argues that there is a set of basic principles and minimal requirements that should form the basis for every responsible gambling program.

Keywords

Responsible gambling Pathological gambling Prevention 

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2004). The diagnostic and statistic manual of mental disorders––4th edition, text revision. Washington D.C.: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., Nower, L., & Shaffer, H. (2008). Informed choice and gambling: Principles for consumer protection. The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 2, 103–118.Google Scholar
  3. Blaszczynski, A., Sharpe, L., & Walker, M. (2001). The assessment of the impact of the reconfiguration of electronic gambling machines as harm minimisation strategies for problem gambling. University Printing Service: The University of Sydney Gambling Research Unit.Google Scholar
  4. LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Stability and progression of disordered gambling: Lessons from longitudinal studies. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 53(1), 52–60.Google Scholar
  5. Loo, J. M. Y., Raylu, N., & Oei, T. (2008). Gambling among the Chinese: A comprehensive review. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1152–1166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. National Opinion Research Center. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study: Report to the national gambling impact study commission. University of Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.Google Scholar
  7. Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s gambling industries. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  8. Productivity Commission. (2009). Productivity draft report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Blaszczynski
    • 1
  • Peter Collins
    • 2
  • Davis Fong
    • 3
  • Robert Ladouceur
    • 4
  • Lia Nower
    • 5
  • Howard J. Shaffer
    • 6
  • Hermano Tavares
    • 7
  • Jean-Luc Venisse
    • 8
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Salford Business SchoolUniversity of SalfordSalfordUK
  3. 3.Institute for the Study of Commercial GamingUniversity of MacauMacauChina
  4. 4.École de PsychologieUniversité LavalQuebecCanada
  5. 5.Center for Gambling StudiesRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  6. 6.Division on AddictionsThe Cambridge Health Alliance: Harvard Medical SchoolCambridgeUSA
  7. 7.Institute and Department of PsychiatryUniversity of São PauloSao PauloBrazil
  8. 8.Centre de Référence du jeu excessif, CHU NantesNantesFrance

Personalised recommendations