Where Did All the Pathological Gamblers Go? Gambling Symptomatology and Stage of Change Predict Attrition in Longitudinal Research
- 321 Downloads
Attrition can introduce a systematic bias that can negatively affect validity (Cook and Campbell, Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. Rand McNally, Chicago, 1979). Current longitudinal research in gambling, however, has generally overlooked the reasons for attrition. The current research examined the relationship between pathological gambling symptomatology, stage of change and attrition. Three hundred and seventy-nine participants were contacted 12 months after initially participating in a study on gambling for a follow-up session. Logistic regression revealed those in the contemplation and preparation stages of change reported higher levels of pathological gambling symptomatology and were more likely to drop out of the study compared to those in the precontemplation stage. As predicted, gambling symptomatology mediated the relationship between stages of change and attrition. The implication for longitudinal research on gambling as well as extant findings that have used this methodological approach is discussed.
KeywordsGambling Attrition Stage of change Longitudinal Pathology Drop out
This research was supported by a research grant from the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre (#2345) to the first author. We thank Judith Glynn for her helpful comments on this paper.
- American Psychiatric Association (APA). (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
- Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Michaud, V. (2004). Comparisons between the South Oaks gambling screen and a DSM-IV-based interview in a community survey of problem gambling. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 258–264.Google Scholar
- Dietz-Uhler, B., Harrick, E. A., End, C., & Jacquemotte, L. (2000). Sex differences in sport fan behavior and reasons for being a sport fan. Journal of Sport Behavior, 23, 219–231.Google Scholar
- Farrington, D. R., Gallagher, B., Morley, L., St. Ledger, R., & West, D. J. (1990). Minimizing attrition in longitudinal research: Methods of tracing and securing cooperation in a 24-year follow-up study. In L. R. Bergman & D. Magnusson (Eds.), Data quality in longitudinal research (pp. 122–147). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Herr, N. R. (2006). Mediation with dichotomous outcomes. Retrieved November 2, 2009, from http://nrherr.bol.ucla.edu/Mediation/logmed.html.
- Jacques, C., & Ladouceur, R. (2006). Prospective study on the impact of opening a casino on gambling behaviors: Two and four year follow-ups. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 51, 764–777.Google Scholar
- Korn, D. A. (2000). Expansion of gambling in Canada: Implications for health and social policy. Canadian Medial Association Journal, 136, 61–64.Google Scholar
- Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Chevalier, S., Sévigny, S., & Hamel, D. (2005). Prevalence of pathological gambling in Quebec in 2002. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50, 451–456.Google Scholar
- Lawrance, K., Dane, A., Yardley, J., Root, L., & McPhee, J. (2007). Discontinuation of gambling: Adolescent at-risk and problem gamblers in three stages of change. Scale validation. Guelph, Ontario: The Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Llinares Pellicer, M. C., Palau Muñoz, C., Santos Diez, P., Albiach Catalá, C., & Camacho Ferrer, I. (2002). Estudio del estadio de cambio y estado emocional en jugadores patológicos. Adicciones, 14, 145–150.Google Scholar
- Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre. (2006). Researchers selected for groundbreaking study on gambling (2006, March 30). Retrieved Nov 16, 2009, from http://www.gamblingresearch.org/contentdetail.sz?cid=3086.
- Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1986). Toward a comprehensive model of change. In W. R. Miller & N. Heather (Eds.), Treating addictive behaviors: Processes of change (pp. 3–27). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Prochaska, J. O., Redding, C. A., & Evers, K. E. (2002). The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & F. M. Lewis (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 99–120). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Rees, D. W., Beech, H. R., & Hore, B. D. (1984). Some factors associated with compliance in the treatment of alcoholism. Journal of Alcoholism, 19, 303–307.Google Scholar
- Shaffer, H., Hall, M., & VanderBilt, J. (1997). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the US and Canada: A metaanalysis. MA: Harvard Medical School.Google Scholar
- Slutske, W. S. (2007). Longitudinal studies of gambling behavior. In G. Smith, D. C. Hodgmins, & R. J. Williams (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 127–154). San Diego, CA: Elsevier, Academic Press Publications.Google Scholar
- Sutton, S. (1996). Can ‘stages of change’ provide guidance in the treatment of addictions? A critical examination of Prochaska and DiClemente’s model. In G. Edwards & C. Dare (Eds.), Psychotherapy, psychological treatments and the addictions (pp. 189–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Sutton, S. (1997). Transtheoretical model of behavior change. In A. Baum, C. McManus, S. Newman, J. Weinman, & R. West (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine (pp. 180–193). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar