Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 301–329 | Cite as

Thirty Years of Lottery Public Health Research: Methodological Strategies and Trends

  • Debi A. LaPlante
  • Heather M. Gray
  • Leslie Bosworth
  • Howard J. Shaffer
Original Paper

Abstract

Cognitive measurement techniques, such as self-reports of behavior and reaction time measures, largely dominate the field of psychological research. It is uncommon for researchers to examine a phenomenon of interest by observing actual behavior within natural settings. To illustrate the existence of this methodological trend for gambling research, this article reviews systematically selected samples of the peer-reviewed literature related to lottery gambling in general and the literature related to pathological gambling and lottery more specifically. The results indicate that self-report surveys dominate the extant lottery literature, and experimental investigations of video lottery terminal gambling supplement those papers. This landscape encourages researchers to expand their methodological approaches to the study of lottery gambling. Currently, we know more about what research participants tell us they do with respect to lottery gambling than we do about their real-life lottery gambling behavior.

Keywords

Gambling Gambling problems Lottery Review Methodology 

References

  1. Ariyabuddhiphongs, V. (2006). A test of the Social Cognitive Model of lottery gambling in Thailand. International Gambling Studies, 6(1), 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 396–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beenstock, M., & Haitovsky, Y. (2001). Lottomania and other anomalies in the market for lotto. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(6), 721–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braidfoot, L. (1988). Legalization of lotteries in the 1980s. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 4(4), 282–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brañas-Garza, P., Georgantzís, N., & Guillen, P. (2007). Direct and indirect effects of pathological gambling on risk attitudes. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(2), 126–136.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, M. A., French, S., & Gendreau, P. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 567–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chéné, C. (2005). Problem gambling ‘like a new disease’. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 173(1), 21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole, W. R., & Hastie, R. (1978). The effects of lottery game structure and format on subjective probability and attractiveness of gambles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(4), 608–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coombs, C. H., Donnel, M. L., & Kirk, D. B. (1978). An experimental study of risk preference in lotteries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(3), 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corey, S. M. (1937). Professed attitudes and actual behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 28(4), 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cote, M.-A., Vitaro, F., & Ladouceur, R. (2003). Attitudes, knowledge, and behavior of Quebecois parents regarding youth gambling. Canadian Psychology, 44(2), 152–161.Google Scholar
  12. Coups, E., Haddock, G., & Webley, P. (1998). Correlates and predictors of lottery play in the United Kingdom. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(3), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox, B. J., Yu, N., Afifi, T. O., & Ladouceur, R. (2005). A national survey of gambling problems in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/La Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 50(4), 213–217.Google Scholar
  14. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Diskin, K. M., & Hodgins, D. C. (1999). Narrowing of attention and dissociation in pathological video lottery gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15(1), 17–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Diskin, K. M., & Hodgins, D. C. (2001). Narrowed focus and dissociative experiences in a community sample of experienced video lottery gamblers. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 33(1), 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diskin, K. M., & Hodgins, D. C. (2003). Psychophysiological and subjective arousal during gambling in pathological and non-pathological video lottery gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 3(1), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diskin, K. M., Hodgins, D. C., & Skitch, S. A. (2003). Psychophysiological and subjective responses of a community sample of video lottery gamblers in gambling venues and laboratory situations. International Gambling Studies, 3(2), 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Division on Addictions. (2007). The state of public health research on internet gambling [Electronic Version]. The brief addiction science information source. Retrieved October 20, 2009 from http://www.basisonline.org/2007/06/op-ededitorials.html.
  20. Doiron, J. P., & Mazer, D. B. (2001). Gambling with video lottery terminals. Qualitative Health Research, 11(5), 631–646.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Doiron, J. P., & Nicki, R. M. (2007). Prevention of pathological gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 36(2), 74–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ellery, M., Stewart, S. H., & Loba, P. (2005). Alcohol’s effects on Video Lottery Terminal (VLT) play among probable pathological and non-pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(3), 299–324.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Felsher, J. R., Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2003). Parental influences and social modelling of youth lottery participation. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 13(5), 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fisher, S. (1999). A prevalence study of gambling and problem gambling in British adolescents. Addiction Research, 7(6), 509–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frost, R. O., Meagher, B. M., & Riskind, J. H. (2001). Obsessive-compulsive features in pathological lottery and scratch-ticket gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(1), 5–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Funk, D. C., Nakazawa, M., Mahony, D. F., & Thrasher, R. (2006). The impact of the national sports lottery and the FIFA World Cup on attendance, spectator motives and J. League marketing strategies. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 7(3), 267–285.Google Scholar
  27. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Griffiths, M. (2000). Scratchcard gambling among adolescent males. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(1), 79–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Griffiths, M., & Wood, R. T. A. (2000). Risk factors in adolescence: The case of gambling, videogame playing, and the Internet. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(2), 199–225.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Grüsser, S. M., Plöntzke, B., Albrecht, U., & Mörsen, C. P. (2007). The addictive potential of lottery gambling. Journal of Gambling Issues, 19, 19–30.Google Scholar
  31. Haisley, E., Mostafa, R., & Loewenstein, G. (2008). Subjective relative income and lottery ticket purchases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21(3), 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hardoon, K. K., Baboushkin, H. R., Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2001). Underlying cognitions in the selection of lottery tickets. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(6), 749–763.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hendricks, V. M., Meerkerk, G.-J., Van Oers, H. A. M., & Garretsen, H. F. L. (1997). The Dutch instant lottery: Prevalence and correlates of at-risk playing. Addiction, 92(3), 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hendriks, V. M., Garretsen, H. F., & van de Goor, A. (1997). A “parliamentary inquiry” into alcohol and drugs: A survey of psychactive substance use and gambling among members of the Dutch parliament. Substance Use and Misuse, 32(6), 679–697.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hodgins, D. C., & Makarchuk, K. (2003). Trusting problem gamblers: Reliability and validity of self-reported gambling behavior. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17(3), 244–248.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hraba, J., Mok, W., & Huff, D. (1990). Lottery play and problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6(4), 355–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jefferson, S., & Nicki, R. (2003). A new instrument to measure cognitive distortions in video lottery terminal users: The Informational Biases Scale (IBS). Journal of Gambling Studies, 19(4), 387–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Knox, R. E., & Safford, R. (1976). Group caution at the race track. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(3), 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kofoed, L., Morgan, T. J., Buchkowski, J., & Carr, R. (1997). Dissociative Experiences Scale and MMPI-2 scores in video poker gamblers, other gamblers, and alcoholic controls. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 185(1), 58–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kuentzel, J. G., Henderson, M. J., Zambo, J. J., Stine, S. M., & Schuster, C. R. (2003). Motivational interviewing and fluoxetine for pathological gambling disorder: A single case study. North American Journal of Psychology, 5(2), 229–248.Google Scholar
  41. LaBrie, R. A., Kaplan, S. A., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Inside the virtual casino: A prospective longitudinal study of actual Internet casino gambling. European Journal of Public Health, 18(4), 410–416.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Ladouceur, R. (2004). Perceptions among pathological and nonpathological gamblers. Addictive Behaviors, 29(3), 555–565.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ladouceur, R., Boutin, C., Doucet, C. l., Provencher, M., Boucher, C., Giroux, I., et al. (2004). Awareness promotion about excessive gambling among video lottery retailers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(2), 181–185.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ladouceur, R., & Sévigny, S. (2006). The impact of video lottery game speed on gamblers. Journal of Gambling Issues, 17, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ladouceur, R., Sévigny, S., Blaszczynski, A., Lavoie, M. E., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Video lottery: Winning expectancies and arousal. Addiction, 98(6), 733–738.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. LaPiere, R. T. (1934). Attitudes vs. actions. Social Forces, 13(2), 230–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. LaPlante, D. A., Kleschinsky, J. H., LaBrie, R. A., Nelson, S. E., & Shaffer, H. J. (2009). Sitting at the virtual poker table: A prospective epidemiological study of actual internet poker gambling behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 711–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Law, S. (2006). Letters of the Editor: Problem Gambling in the Canadian North Neglected. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/La Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 51(2), 127–128.Google Scholar
  49. Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2006). What do laboratory experiments tell us about the real world? Department of Economics, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  50. List, J. A. (2006). The behaviorlist meets the market: Measuring social preferences and reputation effects in actual transactions. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Loba, P., Stewart, S. H., Klein, R. M., & Blackburn, J. R. (2001). Manipulations of the features of standard video lottery terminal (VLT) games: Effects in pathological and non-pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(4), 297–320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lopes, L. L. (1976). Model-based decision and inference in stud poker. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105(3), 217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lorenz, V. C. (1990). State lotteries and compulsive gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6(4), 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. National Conference of State Legislatures. (2006). Lottery payouts and state revenue. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from http://www.ncsl.org/?TabId=12747.
  55. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. O’Dwyer, A.-M., & Sheppard, N. P. (1993). Major depressive illness with secondary pathological gambling: Case report and literature review. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 10(1), 36–37.Google Scholar
  57. Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 598–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Peller, A. J., LaPlante, D. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Parameters for safer gambling behavior: Examining the empirical research. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(4), 519–534.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Rogers, P. (1998). The cognitive psychology of lottery gambling: A theoretical review. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(2), 111–134.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Sanders, G. S. (1978). An integration of shifts toward risk and caution in gambling situations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(4), 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schellinck, T., & Schrans, T. (2004). Gaining control: Trends in the processes of change for video lottery terminal gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 4(2), 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shaffer, H. J., Stanton, M. V., & Nelson, S. E. (2006). Trends in gambling studies research: Quantifying, categorizing, and describing citations. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(4), 427–442.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Shepherd, R.-M., Ghodse, H., & London, M. (1998). A pilot study examining gambling behaviour before and after the launch of the National Lottery and scratch cards in the UK. Addiction Research, 6(1), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sobell, L. C., Sobell, M. B., Litten, R. Z., & Allen, J. P. (1992). Timeline follow-back: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol consumption. In Measuring alcohol consumption: Psychosocial and biochemical methods (pp. 41–72). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.Google Scholar
  65. Sparwel, J., Vantler, M., Caglayan, E., Kappert, K., Fries, J. W. U., Dietrich, H., et al. (2009). Differential effects of red and white wines on inhibition of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor: Impact of the mash fermentation. Cardiovascular Research, 81(4), 758–770.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Stewart, S. H., Collins, P., Blackburn, J. R., Klein, R. M., & Ellery, M. (2005). Heart rate increase to alcohol administration and video lottery terminal (VLT) play among regular VLT players. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19(1), 94–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Stewart, S. H., Peterson, J. B., Collins, P., Ellery, M., & Eisnor, S. (2006). Heart rate increase to alcohol administration and video lottery terminal play among probable pathological gamblers and nonpathological gamblers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20(1), 53–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Weinstock, J., Whelan, J. P., & Meyers, A. W. (2004). Behavioral assessment of gambling: An application of the timeline followback method. Psychological Assessment, 16(1), 72–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wilson, T. D., & LaFleur, S. J. (1995). Knowing what you’ll do: Effects of analyzing reasons on self-prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(1), 21–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Winters, K. C., Stinchfield, R. D., & Kim, L. G. (1995). Monitoring adolescent gambling in Minnesota. Journal of Gambling Studies, 11(2), 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (1998). The acquisition, development and maintenance of lottery and scratchcard gambling in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 21(3), 265–273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2002). Adolescent perceptions of the National Lottery and scratchcards: A qualitative study using group interviews. Journal of Adolescence, 25(6), 655–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wood, R. T., & Williams, R. J. (2007). ‘How much money do you spend on gambling?’ The comparative validity of question wordings used to assess gambling expenditure. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice, 10(1), 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Debi A. LaPlante
    • 1
  • Heather M. Gray
    • 1
  • Leslie Bosworth
    • 2
  • Howard J. Shaffer
    • 1
  1. 1.Division on Addictions, Cambridge Health AllianceHarvard Medical SchoolMedfordUSA
  2. 2.Division on AddictionsCambridge Health AllianceMedfordUSA

Personalised recommendations