An Animal Model of Slot Machine Gambling: The Effect of Structural Characteristics on Response Latency and Persistence
- 355 Downloads
Despite the prevalence of problem gamblers and the ethical issues involved in studying gambling behavior with humans, few animal models of gambling have been developed. When designing an animal model it is necessary to determine if behavior in the paradigm is similar to human gambling. In human studies, response latencies following winning trials and near win trials are greater than those following clear losses. Weatherly and Derenne (Anal Gambl Behav 1:79–89, 2007) investigated whether this pattern was found with rats working in an animal analogue of slot machine gambling. They found a similar pattern of response latencies but the subjects’ behavior did not come under control of the visual stimuli signalling the different outcomes. The animal model of slot machine gambling we used addressed procedural issues in Weatherly and Derenne’s model and examined whether reinforcer magnitude and the presence of near win trials influenced response latency and resistance to extinction. Response latencies of the six female Norway Hooded rats varied as a function of reinforcer magnitude and the presence of near-win trials. These results are consistent with prior research and with the idea that near win trials serve as conditional reinforcers.
KeywordsGambling Near-win Reinforcer magnitude Animal analogue
The authors wish to acknowledge the Science Faculty of Victoria University of Wellington and the Open Polytechnic for grants that supported this research and Kevin Grieg’s able assistance in collecting the data.
- Abbott, M. W. (2001). Problem and non-problem gamblers in New Zealand: A report on phase two of the 1999 national prevalence survey. Report number six of the New Zealand gaming survey. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.Google Scholar
- Dixon, M. R., & Schreiber, J. B. (2002) Utilizing a computerized video poker simulation for the collection of data on gambling behavior. The Psychological Record, 52, 417–428.Google Scholar
- Dixon, M. R., & Schreiber, J. E. (2004). Near-miss effects on response latencies and win estimations of slot machine players. The Psychological Record, 54, 335–348.Google Scholar
- Giroux, I., & Ladouceur, R. (2006). The effect of near wins on the choice of a video lottery terminal. Gambling Research, 18, 69–75.Google Scholar
- Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behaviour. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Weatherly, J. N., & Derenne, A. (2007). Rats playing a slot machine: A preliminary attempt at an animal gambling model. Analysis of Gambling Behavior, 1, 79–89.Google Scholar