Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 571–581 | Cite as

Never Smile at a Crocodile: Betting on Electronic Gaming Machines is Intensified by Reptile-Induced Arousal

Original Paper

Abstract

Tourists at the Koorana Saltwater Crocodile Farm in Coowonga, Queensland, Australia, including 62 males and 41 females, aged 18–66 (M = 34.2, SD = 13.3), were randomly assigned to play a laptop-simulated Electronic Gaming Machine (EGM) either: (1) prior to entry, or (2) after having held a 1-m saltwater-crocodile. Gambling behavior; including bet-size, speed of betting, final payouts and trials played on the EGM; was investigated with respect to participants’ assigned arousal condition, problem-gambling status, and affective state. At-risk gamblers with few self-reported negative emotions placed higher average bets at the EGM after having held the crocodile when compared to the control. In contrast, at-risk gamblers with many self-reported negative emotions placed lower average bets at the EGM after having held the crocodile. The results suggest that high arousal can intensify gambling in at-risk players, but only if this feeling state is not perceived as a negative emotion.

Keywords

Gambling Pathological gambling Physiological arousal Sensation seeking Affect Poker Fruit Slot 

References

  1. Blaszcvznski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathway model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, S. L., Rodda, S., & Phillips, J. G. (2004). Differences between problem and nonproblem gamblers in subjective arousal and affective valence amongst electronic gaming machine players. Addictive Behaviors, 29(9), 1863–1867.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dickerson, M., Cunningham, R., England, S. L., & Hinchy, J. (1991). On the determinants of persistent gambling: III. Personality, prior mood, and poker machine play. International Journal of the Addictions, 26(5), 531–548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 510–517.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  6. Hull, C. L. (1952). A behavior system: An introduction to behavior theory concerning the individual organism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Leary, K., & Dickerson, M. (1985). Levels of arousal in high- and low-frequency gamblers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23(6), 635–640.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Manstead, A. S., & Wagner, H. L. (1981). Arousal, cognition and emotion: An appraisal of two-factor theory. Current Psychological Reviews, 1(1), 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McConaghy, N. (1980). Behavior completion mechanisms rather than primary drives maintain behavioral patterns. Activas Nervosa Superior (Praha), 22(2), 138–151.Google Scholar
  10. Moodie, C., & Finnigan, F. (2005). A comparison of the autonomic arousal of frequent, infrequent and non-gamblers while playing fruit machines. Addiction, 100(1), 51–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rockloff, M. J. (2008). The impact of self-awareness and physiological arousal on EGM gambling behaviour. Brisbane, QLD: Office of Liquor, Gaming and Racing.Google Scholar
  12. Rockloff, M., & Dyer, V. (2006). The four Es of problem gambling: A psychological measure of risk. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(1), 101–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rockloff, M., & Dyer, V. (2007). An experiment on the social facilitation of gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(1), 1–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rockloff, M., Signal, T., & Dyer, V. (2007). Full of sound and fury, signifying something: The impact of autonomic arousal on EGM gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(4), 457–465.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379–399.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sharpe, L. (2004). Patterns of autonomic arousal in imaginal situations of winning and losing in problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(1), 95–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Spence, J. T., & Spence, K. W. (1966). The motivational components of manifest anxiety: Drive and drive stimuli. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety and behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Spence, K. W., Farber, I. E., & McFann, H. H. (1956). The relation of anxiety (drive) level to performance in competitional and noncompetitional paired-associated learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 296–305.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149(3681), 269–274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Health and Social Science ResearchCQUniversityBundabergAustralia

Personalised recommendations