Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 129–144 | Cite as

One Decade of Self Exclusion: Missouri Casino Self-Excluders Four to Ten Years after Enrollment

  • Sarah E. Nelson
  • John H. Kleschinsky
  • Richard A. LaBrie
  • Sara Kaplan
  • Howard J. Shaffer
Original Paper

Abstract

For more than a decade, casinos around the world have offered self-exclusion programs (SEPs) to gamblers seeking help with their gambling behavior. Despite the proliferation of SEPs, little is known about the long-term outcomes for gamblers who utilize these programs. The current study assessed the experiences of a sample (N = 113) of Missouri self-excluders (SEs) for as long as 10 years after their initial enrollment in the Missouri Voluntary Exclusion Program (MVEP). Most SEs had positive experiences with MVEP and reduced their gambling and gambling problems after enrollment. However, 50% of SEs who attempted to trespass at Missouri casinos after enrollment were able to, indicating that the benefit of MVEP was attributable more to the act of enrollment than enforcement. SEs who engaged in complementary treatment or self-help groups had more positive outcomes than those who did not, suggesting that SEPs ought to encourage and provide information about additional support and treatment options to participants.

Keywords

Gambling Pathological gambling Casino Self exclusion Program evaluation 

References

  1. Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, M. (1994). Gambling and pathological gambling: Growth industry and growth pathology of the 1990 s. Community Mental Health in New Zealand, 9(2), 22–31.Google Scholar
  2. American Gaming Association. (2003). Self-exclusion 101 [Electronic Version]. Responsible Gaming Quarterly (Winter). Retrieved February 4, 2003.Google Scholar
  3. Hodgins, D. C., Wynne, H., & Makarchuk, K. (1999). Pathways to recovery from gambling problems: Follow-up from a general population survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15(2), 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. LaBrie, R. A., Nelson, S. E., LaPlante, D. A., Peller, A. J., Caro, G., & Shaffer, H. J. (2007). Missouri casino self-excluders: Distributions across time and space. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(2), 231–243.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Giroux, I., Ferland, F., & Leblond, J. (2000). Analysis of a casino’s self-exclusion program. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(4), 453–460.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., & Gosselin, P. (2007). Self-exclusion program: A longitudinal evaluation study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 85–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Missouri Gaming Commission. (2008). Voluntary Exclusion Program. Retrieved May 01, 2008, from http://www.mgc.dps.mo.gov/prob_gambling/pg_vep.htm.
  9. Nowatzki, N. R., & Williams, R. J. (2002). Casino self-exclusion programmes: A review of the issues. International Gambling Studies, 2, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nower, L. M., & Blaszczynski, A. P. (2006). Characteristics and gender differences among self-excluded casino problem gamblers: Missouri data. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(1), 81–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Nower, L. M., & Blaszczynski, A. P. (2008). Characteristics of problem gamblers 56 years of age or older: A statewide study of casino self-excluders. Psychology and Aging, 23(3), 577–584.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rhea, A. (2005). Voluntary self exclusion lists: How they work and potential problems. Gaming Law Review, 9(5), 462–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stewart, R. M., & Brown, R. I. (1988). An outcome study of Gamblers Anonymous. British Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 284–288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Stinchfield, R., Winters, K. C., Botzet, A., Jerstad, S., & Breyer, J. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the gambling treatment outcome monitoring system (GAMTOMS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21(2), 174–184.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. United States Census Bureau. (2006). American Community Survey. Retrieved August 1, 2008, from http://factfinder.census.gov.
  16. Volberg, R. A. (2000). The future of gambling in the United Kingdom: Increasing access creates more problem gamblers. British Medical Journal, 320(7249), 1556.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah E. Nelson
    • 1
    • 2
  • John H. Kleschinsky
    • 1
  • Richard A. LaBrie
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sara Kaplan
    • 3
  • Howard J. Shaffer
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Division on AddictionsCambridge Health AllianceMedfordUSA
  2. 2.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Columbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations