Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 249–256 | Cite as

Experimental Analysis of the Game in Pathological Gamblers: Effect of the Immediacy of the Reward in Slot Machines

Original Paper

Abstract

Slot machines are the most “addictive” games because (a) the disorder (pathological gambling) appears more rapidly in these games than with any other; (b) most patients who seek professional help are mainly addicted to electronic gambling, and (c) even though it is not the more frequent game, most of all the money spent on legal games of chance (at least in Spain) goes to slot machines. Structural characteristics of slot machines induce to gamble because electronic games show the main parameters of operant conditioning, mainly the immediacy of the reinforcement. Ten pathological gamblers played slot machine in two conditions: immediate and delayed reinforcement. The results corroborate the importance of the immediacy of the reinforcement in gambling, because when the result appears immediately (after 2 s), more games are played than when the result is delayed only 10 s. Critical issues in problem gambling prevention and public health are discussed.

Keywords

Pathological gambling Slot machines Addiction Reinforcement 

References

  1. Becoña, E. (2004). El juego patológico: prevalencia en España. Salud y Drogas, 4, 9–34.Google Scholar
  2. Breen, R. B. (2000, June). Rapid onset on pathological gambling in machine gambling compared with other forms. Paper presented at the 11th international conference on gambling and risk taking, Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
  3. Breen, R. B., & Zimmerman, M. (2005). Rapid onset of pathological gambling in machine gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chóliz, M. (2006). Adicción al juego: sesgos y heurísticos implicados en el juego de azar. Revista Española de Drogodependencias, 31, 173–184.Google Scholar
  5. Chóliz, M. (2008). Adicción al juego de azar. Buenos Aires: Deauno.com.Google Scholar
  6. Coventry, K. R., & Constable, B. (1999). Physiological arousal and sensation-seeking in female fruit machine gamblers. Addiction, 94, 425–430.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickerson, M. G. (1990). Gambling: the psychology of a non-drug compulsion. Drug and Alcohol Review, 9, 187–199.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Echeburúa, E., & Báez, C. (1994). Concepto y evaluación del juego patológico. In J. L. Graña (Ed.), Conductas Adictivas (pp. 521–556): Madrid: Debate.Google Scholar
  9. Fernández-Alba, A., & Labrador, F. (2005). Sociodemographic, psychopathological and clinical characteristics of pathological slot-machine gamblers in treatment: A descriptive study of Spanish male gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 5, 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garvía, R. (2008). Loterías: un estudio desde la nueva sociología económica. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.Google Scholar
  12. Griffiths, M. (1993a). Tolerance in gambling: An objective measure using the psychophysiological analysis of male fruit machine gamblers. Addictive Behaviors, 18, 365–372.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffiths, M. (1993b). Fruit machine gambling: The importance of structural characteristics. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffiths, M. (1994). The role of cognitive bias and skill in fruit machine gambling. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 351–369.Google Scholar
  15. Harrigan, K. A. (2008). Slot machine structural characteristics: Creating near misses using high award symbol ratios. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6, 353–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haw, J. (2008). Random-ratio schedules of reinforcement: The role of early wins and unreinforced trials. Journal of Gambling Issues, 21, 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jackson, A. C., Thomas, S. A., Thomason, N., Holt, T. A., & McCormack, J. (2000). Analysis of clients presenting to break even problem gambling services, July 1 1998 to June 20 1999. Client and Service Analysis Report no 5. Melbourne, Victoria: Victorian Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
  18. Kassinove, J. I., & Schare, M. L. (2001). Effects of the “near miss” and the “big win” on persistence at slot machine gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15, 155–158.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Korn, D. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (1999). Gambling and the health of the public: Adopting a public health perspective. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 289–368.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lieberman, D. A., McIntosh, D. C., & Thomas, G. V. (1979). Learning when reward is delayed: A marking hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 5, 224–242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. McConaghy, N., Blaszczynski, A., & Frankova, A. (1991). Comparison of imaginal desensitisation with other behavioural treatments of pathological gambling. A two- to nine-year follow-up. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 390–393.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Moodie, C., & Finnigan, F. (2005). A comparison of the autonomic arousal of frequent, infrequent and non-gamblers while playing fruit machines. Addiction, 100, 51–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Parke, J., & Griffiths, M. (2002, February). Slot machine gamblers—Why are they so hard to study? Electronical Journal of Gambling Issues: eGambling, 6. Retrieved June 24, 2005 from http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue6/index.html.
  24. Parke, J., & Griffiths, M. (2006). The psychology of the fruit machine: The role of structural characteristics (Revisited). International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 4(2), 151–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reid, R. L. (1986). The psychology of the near miss. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2, 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schwartz, D. G. (2006). Roll the bones: The history of gambling. New York: Gotham Books.Google Scholar
  27. SDI, Spanish Department of Interior (2009, April). Informe de Juego 2008. Retrieved May 17, 2009 from http://www.mir.es/sgacavt/juegosyespec/juego/.
  28. Turner, N. E., & Horbay, R. (2004, July). How do slot machines and other electronic gambling machines actually work? Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues: eGambling, 11. Retrieved August 13, 2004, from http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue11/index.html
  29. Verdú, F., Tomás, S., Cano, L., Castellano, M., & Delicado, A. (2008, April). Estudio sobre los hábitos de juego en la Comunitat Valenciana. Paper presented at the 35th Jornadas Nacionales de Socidrogalcohol, La Coruña, Spain.Google Scholar
  30. Weatherly, J. N., & Phelps, B. J. (2006). The pitfalls of studying gambling behaviour in a laboratory situation. In P. M. Ghezzi, C. A. Lyons, M. R. Dixon, & G. A. Wilson (Eds.), Gambling: Behavior theory, research, and application (pp. 105–125). Reno, NV: Context Press.Google Scholar
  31. Weatherly, J. N., Sauter, J. M., & King, B. M. (2004). The “big win” and resistance to extinction when gambling. The Journal of Psychology, 138, 495–504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wykes, A. (1964). The complete illustrated guide to gambling. Garden City: Doubleday & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Zlomke, K. R., & Dixon, M. R. (2006). Modification of slot-machine preferences through the use of a conditional discrimination paradigm. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 351–361.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departament of Psicología BásicaUniversidad de ValenciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations