Anticipated Regret, Risk Perception, or Both: Which is Most Likely Responsible for Our Intention to Gamble?
- 595 Downloads
The current study investigated whether risk aversion or regret aversion could be related to a lower intention to gamble, and whether the type of gambling was a moderator of this relationship. The study took place in Macau, often called “the Las Vegas of East Asia.” A total of 373 Macau residents completed a questionnaire survey dealing with thirteen types of gambling. The results showed that risk perception and anticipated regret had a significant negative effect on the intention to gamble. This negative effect was domain-specific, varying with the type of gambling. Our findings indicated that neither risk aversion nor regret aversion can uniquely explain an individual’s risk-taking tendency consistently. Instead, which factor plays a greater role in lowering the intention to gamble—regret aversion, risk aversion, or both—is itself dependent on the type of gambling involved. The finding that not all gambles are created equal could be useful in gambling prevention and advertising appeal by providing a basis for understanding the role that cognitive and emotional factors play in different types of gambling.
KeywordsRisk perception Anticipated regret Intention to gamble Type of gambling Moderator effect
This research was partially supported by the “Hundred Talents Program” of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Knowledge Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. KSCX2-YW-R-130), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 70671099, 70701036 and 70871110). We are indebted to the respondents for their participation in the survey; to Jie-Hong Xu and Yan-Ling Bi for their discussions; to Zhong-Lin Wen and Xi Liu for statistical assistance; to Alexei Nowak for assistance with English; and to two anonymous referees for helpful comments on the initial version.
- Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behaviour as risk taking. In R. F. Hancock (Ed.), Dynamic marketing for a changing world, proceedings of the 43rd conference of the American Marketing Association (pp. 389–398). Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
- Bazerman, M. H. (1986). Judgment in managerial decision making. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Bromiley, P., & Curley, S. P. (1992). Individual differences in risk taking. In J. F. Yates (Ed.), Risk-taking behavior (pp. 87–132). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Chen, L. (2003, Mar 24). Macau residents are less keen on gambling. Peoples Daily Overseas Edition.Google Scholar
- Cox, D. F. (Ed.). (1967). Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.Google Scholar
- Cox, D. F., & Rich, S. U. (1967). Perceived risk and consumer decision making—the case of telephone shopping. In D. F. Cox (Ed.), Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior (pp. 487–506). Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.Google Scholar
- MacCrimmon, K. R., & Wehrung, D. A. (1986). Taking risks: The management of uncertainty. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
- Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1990). Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3(4), 263–277.Google Scholar
- Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- SjÖberg, L., Moen, B. E. & Rundmo, T. (2004). Explaining risk perception: An evaluation of the psychometric paradigm in risk perception research (pp. 1–17). Trondheim, Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
- Slovic, P. (1997). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. In M. Bazerman, D. Messick, A. Tenbrunsel, & K. Wade-Benzoni (Eds.), Psychological perspectives to environmental and ethical issues in management (pp. 277–313). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1986). The psychometric study of risk perception. In V. T. Covello, J. Menkes, & J. Mumpower (Eds.), Risk evaluation and management (pp. 3–24). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Sun, Y., & Li, S. (2005). Risk perception and gambling behavior among Macau residents: An exploratory study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37(2), 260–267. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
- The Economist (2007, Jan 25). Gambling in Macau.Google Scholar
- Tochkov, K. (2009a). The effects of anticipated regret on risk preferences of social and problem gamblers. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(3), 227–234.Google Scholar
- Tochkov, K. (2009b). The impact of emotions on problem gambling. American Journal of Psychological Research, 5, 7–19.Google Scholar
- Weber, E. U. (1998). Who’s afraid of a little risk? New evidence for general risk aversion. In J. Shanteau, B. A. Mellers, & D. Schum (Eds.), Decision research from bayesian approaches to normative systems: Reflections on the contributions of Ward Edwards. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Wide, G. J. S. (1978). Theorie der risikokompensation der unfallverursachung und praktische folgerungen fur die unfallverhutung. Hefte zur Unfallheilkunde, 130(2), 134–156.Google Scholar