Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 569–581 | Cite as

The Development of a Multi-dimensional Gambling Accessibility Scale

  • Nerilee Hing
  • John Haw
Original Paper


The aim of the current study was to develop a scale of gambling accessibility that would have theoretical significance to exposure theory and also serve to highlight the accessibility risk factors for problem gambling. Scale items were generated from the Productivity Commission’s (Australia’s Gambling Industries: Report No. 10. AusInfo, Canberra, 1999) recommendations and tested on a group with high exposure to the gambling environment. In total, 533 gaming venue employees (aged 18–70 years; 67% women) completed a questionnaire that included six 13-item scales measuring accessibility across a range of gambling forms (gaming machines, keno, casino table games, lotteries, horse and dog racing, sports betting). Also included in the questionnaire was the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) along with measures of gambling frequency and expenditure. Principal components analysis indicated that a common three factor structure existed across all forms of gambling and these were labelled social accessibility, physical accessibility and cognitive accessibility. However, convergent validity was not demonstrated with inconsistent correlations between each subscale and measures of gambling behaviour. These results are discussed in light of exposure theory and the further development of a multi-dimensional measure of gambling accessibility.


Gambling access Exposure Staff gambling Problem gambling 



Financial assistance for this research was provided by the State of Victoria through the Department of Justice.


  1. Abbott, M. W. (2001). What do we know about gambling and problem gambling in New Zealand? Report number seven of the New Zealand gaming survey. Wellington: The Department of Internal Affairs.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, M. (2006). Do EGMs and problem gambling go together like a horse and carriage? Gambling Research, 18(1), 7–38.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, G., Sullivan, A., Horton, K., Menna, R., & Guilmette, A. (2007). A study of the differences in Canadian university students’ gambling and proximity to a casino. Journal of Gambling Issues, 19, 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006a). Catalogue No. 8684.0: Gambling services. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  5. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2006b). Catalogue No. 8687.0: Clubs, pubs, taverns and bars. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
  6. Barron, J. M., Staton, M. E., & Wilshusen, S. M. (2002). The impact of casino gambling on personal bankruptcy filing rates. Contemporary Economic Policy, 20, 440–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487–499.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Boardman, B., & Perry, J. J. (2007). Access to gambling and declaring personal bankruptcy. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36, 789–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Centre for Gambling Research. (2004). GRP report No. 6: 2003 Victorian longitudinal community attitudes survey. Melbourne: Gambling Research Panel.Google Scholar
  10. Chhabra, D. (2007). Ethnicity and marginality effects on casino gambling. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 13(3), 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke, D., Tse, S., Abbott, M., Townsend, S., Kingi, P., & Manaia, W. (2007). Reasons for starting and continuing gambling in a mixed ethnic community sample of pathological and non-problem gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 7, 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delfabbro, P. H. (2002). The distribution of electronic gaming machines (EGMs) and gambling related harm in metropolitan Adelaide. Report commissioned by the Independent Gambling Authority of South Australia.Google Scholar
  13. Delfabbro, P. H. (2008). Australasian gambling review (3rd ed.). Adelaide: Independent Gambling Authority.Google Scholar
  14. Doran, B. J., McMillen, J., & Marshall, D. C. (2007). A GIS-based investigation of gaming venue catchments. Transactions in GIS, 11(4), 575–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  16. Field, A. P. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Hinch, T., & Walker, G. J. (2005). Casino markets: A study of tourist and local patrons. Tourism & Hospitality Research, 6, 72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hing, N., & Breen, H. (2006). Workplace factors that encourage and discourage gambling amongst gaming venue employees: An employees’ perspective. Gambling Research, 18, 7–32.Google Scholar
  19. Hing, N., & Breen, H. (2007). Workplace factors that encourage and discourage gambling amongst gaming venue employees: A manager’s perspective. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 5, 346–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hing, N., & Breen, H. (2008a). How working in a gaming venue can lead to problem gambling. The experiences of six gaming venue staff. Journal of Gambling Issues, 21, 11–29.Google Scholar
  21. Hing, N., & Breen, H. (2008b). Gambling problems among gambling venue employees. A preliminary survey. The Journal of Occupational Health and Safety, 24, 329–341.Google Scholar
  22. Hing, N., & Breen, H. (2008c). Risk and protective factors relating to gambling by employees of gaming venues. International Gambling Studies, 18, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Ferland, F., & Giroux, I. (1999). Prevalence of problem gambling: A replication study 7 years later. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 802–804.Google Scholar
  24. Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Sevigny, S., & Cantionotti, M. (2005). Impact of the format, arrangement and availability of electronic gaming machines outside casinos on gambling. International Gambling Studies, 5(2), 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Livingstone, C. (2001). Regional caps on poker machine numbers: Impacts, potential impacts and issues. Discussion paper prepared for the City of Darebin. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Primary Care.Google Scholar
  26. Marshall, D. (2005). The gambling environment and gambler behaviour: Evidence from the Richmond-Tweed, Australia. International Gambling Studies, 5(1), 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marshall, D. C., & Baker, R. G. V. (2002). The evolving market structures of gambling: Case studies modelling the socio-economic assignment of gaming machines in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 273–291.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Marshall, D., McMillen, J., Niemeyer, S., & Doran, B. (2004). Gaming machine accessibility and use in suburban Canberra: A detailed analysis of the Tuggeranong Valley. Canberra: ANU Centre for Gambling Research.Google Scholar
  29. McMillen, J., & Doran, B. (2006). Problem gambling and gaming machine density: Socio-spatial analysis of three Victorian localities. International Gambling Studies, 6, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moore, S., Thomas, A., Kyrios, M., Bates, G., & Meredyth, D. (2008, December). Gambling access preferences of at-risk and social gamblers. Paper presented at National Association for Gambling Studies Annual Conference. Adelaide.Google Scholar
  31. Pearce, J., Mason, K., Hiscock, R., & Day, P. (2008). A national study of neighbourhood access to gambling opportunities and individual gambling behaviour. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62, 862–868.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Perese, L., Bellringer, M., & Abbott, M. (2005). Literature review to inform social marketing objectives and approaches and behaviour change indicators to prevent and minimize gambling harm. Wellington: Gambling Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology.Google Scholar
  33. Potenza, M., Maciejewski, P., & Mazure, C. (2006). A gender-based examination of past-year recreational gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(1), 41–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Productivity Commission. (1999). Australia’s gambling industries: Report No. 10. Canberra: AusInfo.Google Scholar
  35. Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Shaffer, H. J., & Korn, D. A. (2002). Gambling and related mental disorders: A public health analysis. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 171–212.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Shaffer, H. J., La Brie, R. A., & La Plante, D. A. (2004a). Laying the foundation for quantifying regional exposure to social phenomena: Considering the case of legalized gambling as a public health toxin. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 40–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Shaffer, H. J., La Brie, R. A., La Plante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., & Stanton, (2004b). The road less travelled: Moving from distribution to determinants in the study of gambling epidemiology. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 504–516.Google Scholar
  39. Thomas, A. C., Sullivan, G. B., & Allen, F. C. L. (2008). A theoretical model of EGM problem gambling: More than a cognitive escape. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. doi:  10.1007/s11469-008-9152-6.
  40. Volberg, R. (2003). Has there been a “feminization” of gambling and problem gambling in the United States? Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues.
  41. Walker, G. J., & Hinch, T. (2006). Segmenting casino tourists mode by experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(2), 568–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Welte, J. W., Wieczorek, W., Barnes, G., Tidwell, M., & Hoffman, J. (2004). The relationship of ecological and geographic factors to gambling behavior and pathology. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(4), 313–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Gambling Education and ResearchSouthern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia

Personalised recommendations