Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 523–539 | Cite as

Knowledge and Beliefs About Gambling in Australian Secondary School Students and their Implications for Education Strategies

  • Paul Delfabbro
  • Chrisi Lambos
  • Daniel King
  • Stan Puglies
Original Paper


This study investigated the nature of gambling-related knowledge and beliefs in a survey study of 2,669 students aged 13–17 years in South Australia. Students were classified as pathological gamblers, at risk, or not at risk based upon the DSM-IV-J, and their responses to questions relating to objective odds, probabilities, and common misperceptions were compared. The study confirmed previous studies which have shown that pathological gamblers are more susceptible to erroneous beliefs concerning randomness and chance, but do not differ in terms of their knowledge of objective odds. These findings were discussed in terms of Ladouceur’s notion of “cognitive switching” and the distinction drawn between “hot” and “cold” cognitions in clinical outcome studies. The implications for school-based education programs are examined with attention given to the potential value of role-playing and simulations in encouraging student reflection and self-awareness.


Adolescent Gambling beliefs Irrational beliefs Education 



This project was supported by grant from the Independent Gambling Authority of South Australia and was supported by the S.A. Department for Education and Children’s Services.


  1. Abbott, M., McKenna, B., & Giles, L. (2000). Gambling and problem gambling among recently sentenced males in four New Zealand prisons. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.Google Scholar
  2. Benhsain, K., & Ladouceur, R. (2004). Knowledge in statistics and erroneous perceptions in gambling. Gambling Research, 16, 25–31.Google Scholar
  3. Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487–500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Crites, T. (2003). What are my chances? Using probability and number sense to educate tends about the mathematical risks of gambling. In H. J. Shaffer, M. N. Hall, J. Vander Bilt, & E. George (Eds.), Futures at stake: Youth, gambling and society (pp. 63–83). Reno, NV: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
  5. Delfabbro, P. H., Lahn, J., & Grabosky, P. (2005). Adolescent gambling: A report on recent ACT research. Canberra: ACT Gambling and Racing Commission.Google Scholar
  6. Delfabbro, P. H., Lahn, J., & Grabosky, P. (2006). It’s not what you know, but how you use it: Statistical knowledge and adolescent problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22, 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delfabbro, P. H., & Thrupp, L. (2003). The social determinants of gambling in South Australian adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 313–330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (1998). Adolescent gambling behavior: A prevalence study and examination of the correlates associated with problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 227–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Derevensky, J., Gupta, R., & Baboushkin, H. R. (2007). Underlying cognitions in children’s gambling behavior: Can they be modified? International Gambling Studies, 7, 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Derevensky, J., Gupta, R., & Della Cioppa, G. (1996). A developmental perspective of gambling behavior in children and adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Derevensky, J., Gupta, R., & Winters, K. (2003). Prevalence rates of youth gambling problems: Are the current rates inflated? Journal of Gambling Studies, 19, 405–425.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Eggert, K. (2004). Truth in gambling: Toward consumer protection in the gambling industry. Maryland Law Review, 63, 218–248.Google Scholar
  13. Ferland, F., Ladouceur, R., & Vitaro, F. (2002). Prevention of problem gambling: Modifying misconceptions and increasing knowledge. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 19–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fisher, S. E. (1992). Measuring pathological gambling in children: The case of fruit machines in the UK. Journal of Gambling Studies, 8, 263–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher, S. E. (1999). A prevalence study of gambling and problem gambling in British adolescents. Addiction Research, 7, 509–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goel, V., & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Reciprocal neural response within lateral and ventral medial prefrontal cortex during hot and cold reasoning. Neuroimage, 20, 2314–2321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Griffiths, M. D. (1994). The role of cognitive bias and skill in fruit machine gambling. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 351–369.Google Scholar
  18. Griffiths, M. D. (1995). Adolescent gambling. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. (1997). Familial and social influences on juvenile gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 179–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hardoon, K., & Derevensky, J. (2001). Social influences involved in children’s gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17, 191–215.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hardoon, K., Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. (2004). Psychosocial variables associated with adolescent gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 170–179.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Irwin, F. W., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1966). Effects of independent and dependent outcomes on bets. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 282–285.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ladouceur, R. (2001). Conceptual issues in screening and diagnostic instruments: Implications for treatment and prevention of gambling disorders. Paper presented at the Toward Meaningful Diagnosis of Gambling Disorders: From theory to practice conference, Las Vegas, Nevada.Google Scholar
  26. Ladouceur, R., Dubé, D., & Bujold, A. (1994). Gambling among primary school students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 10, 363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ladouceur, R., & Mireault, C. (1988). Gambling behaviour among high school students in the Quebec area. Journal of Gambling Behaviour, 4, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ladouceur, R., & Sylvain, C. (1999). Treatment of pathological gambling: A controlled study. Anuario de Psicologia, 30, 127–135.Google Scholar
  29. Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Boutin, C., Lachance, S., Doucet, C., & LeBlond, J. (2003). Group therapy for pathological gamblers: A cognitive approach. Behavior Research and Therapy, 41, 587–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lambos, C., & Delfabbro, P. H. (2007). Numerical reasoning ability and irrational beliefs in problem gambling. International Gambling Studies, 7, 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lambos, C., Delfabbro, P. H., & Puglies, S. (2007). Adolescent gambling in South Australia. Report prepared for the Independent Gambling Authority of South Australia, Adelaide.Google Scholar
  32. Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lesieur, H. R. (1984). The chase: Career of the compulsive gambler (2nd ed.). Rochester, Vermont: Schenkman Books Inc.Google Scholar
  34. Lesieur, H., & Klein, R. (1987). Pathological gambling among high school students. Addictive Behaviours, 12, 129–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moore, S., & Ohtsuka, K. (1997). Gambling activities of young Australians: Developing a model of behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 207–236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Petry, N. (2005). Pathological gambling. New York: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sevigny, S., & Ladouceur, R. (2003). Gamblers’ irrational thinking about chance events: The ‘Double switching’ concept. International Gambling Studies, 3, 162–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shaffer, H. J., & Hall, M. N. (1996). Estimating the prevalence of adolescent gambling disorders: A quantitative synthesis and guide toward standard gambling nomenclature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shaffer, H., & Hall, M. (2001). Updating and refining prevalence estimates of disordered gambling behaviour in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 92, 168–172.Google Scholar
  40. Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vanderbilt, J. (2000). Facing the odds: The mathematics of gambling. Boston: Harvard Medical School.Google Scholar
  41. Sharpe, L., & Tarrier, N. (1993). Towards a cognitive-behavioural theory of problem gambling. British Journal of Psychiatry, 12, 193–214.Google Scholar
  42. Thompson, S., Thomas, C., & Armstrong, W. (1998). Illusions of control, underestimations, and accuracy: A control heuristic explanation. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 143–161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Toneatto, T., Blitz-Miller, T., Calderwood, K., Dragonetti, R., & Tsannos, A. (1997). Cognitive distortions in heavy gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 253–266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Toplak, M. E., Liu, E., MacPherson, R., Toneatto, T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2007). The reasoning skills and thinking dispositions of problem gamblers: A dual-process taxonomy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20, 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Volberg, R., & Moore, W. (1999). Gambling and problem gambling among adolescents in Washington State: a six-year replication study 1993 to 1999. Olympia: Washington State Lottery.Google Scholar
  46. Wagenaar, W. A. (1988). Paradoxes of gambling behaviour. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  47. Walker, M. B. (1992). The psychology of gambling. Sydney: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  48. Williams, R. J., Connolly, D., Wood, R., Currie, S., & Meghan-Davis, R. (2004). Program findings that inform curriculum development for the prevention of problem gambling. Gambling Research, 16, 47–69.Google Scholar
  49. Williams, R., Connolly, D., Wood, R., & Nowatzki, N. (2006). Gambling and problem gambling in a sample of university students. Journal of Gambling Issues, 16.Google Scholar
  50. Wolford, G., Miller, G., & Gazzaniga, M. (2000). The left hemisphere’s role in hypothesis formation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 1–4.Google Scholar
  51. Wynne, H. J., Smith, G. J., & Jacobs, D. F. (1996). Adolescent gambling and problem gambling in Alberta. Edmonton: Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Delfabbro
    • 1
  • Chrisi Lambos
    • 1
  • Daniel King
    • 1
  • Stan Puglies
    • 2
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.AdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations