Electronic Gaming Machine Gambling: Measuring Motivation
- 611 Downloads
Electronic gambling machines (EGMs) are known to be a particularly risky form of gambling (Petry. Addiction 98(5):645–655, 2003). It is vital that researchers and clinicians are aware of factors which could lead to people having problems with this form. Gambling motivation is one such factor. This study developed a measure of EGM gambling motivations based on the results of qualitative research conducted with EGM problem gamblers and experienced counsellors (Thomas et al. Int J Mental Health Addiction 7:97–107, 2009). A community based sample of 232 females (M = 29.60 years of age, SD = 15.41 years) and 123 males (M = 29.64 years of age, SD = 12.29 years) participated. Exploratory factor analysis extracted three motivational factors indicating people gambled on EGMs to escape, for its accessibility and for the social environment. Gambling to escape and for its accessibility had substantial positive correlations with frequency of EGM gambling and gambling problems. Social environment correlated less well with these indicators of excessive gambling. Correlations between factors suggested the accessible, social experience offered by EGM venues increases their appeal as a means of escape. The new subscales were internally consistent and demonstrated good evidence of validity. This new measure will facilitate future investigations into the relationships between gambling motivations, other aetiological factors and EGM problem gambling.
KeywordsGaming machine Problem gambling Avoidance Accessibility Social
- DeVellis, R. (2003). Scale development theory and applications. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Dickerson, M. (2004). Analysis of clients presenting to problem gambling counselling services, July 2001 to June 2002, client and services analysis report No. 8. Melbourne: Victorian Government, Department of Human Resources.Google Scholar
- Driver, B. L. (1983). Master list of items for Recreation Experience Preference scales and domains. USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountains Forest and Range Experiment Station (Unpublished document).Google Scholar
- Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. J. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final report. From www.ccsa.ca/pdf/ccsa-00805-200.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2005.
- Griffiths, M. (2007). Interactive television quizzes as gambling: A cause for concern? Journal of Gambling Issues, 20, 269–276. From http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue20/index.htm. Accessed 11 October 2008.
- Griffiths, M., & Delfabbro, P. (2001). The biopsychosocial approach to gambling: Contextual factors in research and clinical interventions. The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues: eGambling, 5, no pagination specified. From http://www.camh.net/egambling/issue5/index.html. Accessed 14 February 2005.
- Griffiths, M., & Parke, J. (2002). The social impact of internet gambling. Social Science Computer Review, 20(3), 312–320.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F. (2005). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Manfredo, M. J., Driver, B. L., & Tarrant, M. A. (1996). Measuring leisure motivation: A meta-analysis of the recreation experience preference scales. Journal of Leisure Research, 28(3), 188–213.Google Scholar
- McBain, N., & Ohtsuka, K. (2001). Predicting problem gambling among poker machine players from coping styles and motivational factors. In A. Blaszczynski (Ed.), Culture and the gambling phenomenon. Proceedings of the 11th National Association of Gambling Studies conference. Sydney: National Association of Gambling Studies.Google Scholar
- New Focus Research. (2003). Study of Clients of Problem Gambling Services Stage One Report: The experiences of problem gamblers, their families and service providers. Melbourne: Gambling Research Panel.Google Scholar
- Platz, L., & Millar, M. (2001). Gambling in the context of other recreational activity: A quantitative comparison of casual and pathological student gamblers. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(4), 383–395.Google Scholar
- Schrans, T., Schellinck, T., & Walsh, G. (2001). 2000 regular VL players follow up: A comparative analysis of problem development and resolution. Nova Scotia: Nova Scotia Department of Health, Addiction Services.Google Scholar
- Slowo, D. (1997). Are all gamblers the same? An exploration of personality and motivational characteristics of individuals with different gambling preferences. In G. Coman, B. Evans, & R. Woottoon (Eds.), Responsible gambling: A future winner. Proceedings of the 8th National Association of Gambling Studies conference. Melbourne: National Association of Gambling Studies.Google Scholar
- Surgey, D. (2000). Playing for time: Exploring the impacts of gambling on women. Melbourne: Victorian Government, Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson, Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Thomas, A., & Moore, S. (2003). The interactive effects of avoidance coping and dysphoric mood on problem gambling for female and male gamblers. The Electronic Journal of Gambling Issues: eGambling, 8, no pagination specified. From www.camh.net/egambling/issue8/
- Volberg, R. (2003). Gambling and problem gambling in Arizona. Northampton: Gemini Research.Google Scholar
- Yoshioka, C. F., Nilson, R., & Simpson, S. (2002). A cross-cultural study of desired psychological benefits to leisure of American, Canadian, Japanese and Taiwanese college students. LARNet; The Cyber Journal of Applied Leisure and Recreational Research, 4, 1–1. From www.nccu.edu/larnet/2002-4.html. Accessed 19 April 2005.