Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 317–330 | Cite as

Impact of Visiting an Onsite Casino Information Centre on Perceptions about Randomness and Gambling Behaviours

  • Claude Boutin
  • Nicole Tremblay
  • Robert Ladouceur
Original Paper


At the beginning of 2000, some educational initiatives in the field of responsible gambling resulted in the implementation of Onsite Casino Information Centres (OCICs). However, no study has yet empirically evaluated the impact of visiting an OCIC. This paper includes two studies evaluating the OCIC Au Centre du Hasard, located in Montreal, Quebec. The goal of the first study was to identify the profile of the visitors and to assess their appreciation. After a visit, 336 patrons accepted to complete a pen and paper questionnaire. The goal of the second study was to evaluate the impact of a visit on the perceptions about randomness and the gambling behaviours of the visitors. For this study, 67 visitors were evaluated before, after, and 3 months following a visit and their results were compared to a control group. Data showed that most visitors were seniors, occasional slot machine gamblers, and in control of their gambling activities. The majority of guests greatly appreciated their visit. A visit to Au Centre du Hasard seemed to modify the misconceptions towards the notion of randomness but not the gambling behaviours. These gains were maintained at 3-month follow-up. Results with respect to other prevention programs are discussed, and future research avenues are suggested.


Casino Information Centre Responsible Gambling 



This research was supported by a grant from the Fondation Mise-sur-toi (Loto-Quebec). The authors thank La Maison Jean Lapointe for their important contributions to this project.


  1. Blaszczynski, A., Ladouceur, R., & Shaffer, H. J. (2004). A science-based framework for responsible gambling: The Reno model. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(3), 301–317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boutin, C., Dumont, M., Ladouceur, R., & Montecalvo, P. (2003). Excessive gambling and cognitive therapy: How to address ambivalence. Clinical Case Studies, 2, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chevalier, S., Hamel, D., Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Allard, D., & Sévigny, S. (2004). Comportements de jeu et jeu pathologique selon le type de jeu au Québec en 2002.  Montréal et Québec, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec et Université Laval.Google Scholar
  4. Dickerson, M. G. (2003). Exploring the limits of responsible gambling: Harm minimization or consumer protection? In Proceedings of the 12th annual conference of the National Association for Gambling Studies, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  5. Ferland, F., Fournier, P.-M., & Ladouceur, R. (June 2008). Chartered day-trips to Casinos: Why do they attract senior citizens? Poster presented to the 22nd National Conference on Problem Gambling, Long Beach, California.Google Scholar
  6. Gaboury, A., & Ladouceur, R. (1993). Evaluation of a prevention program for pathological gambling among adolescents. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 14(1), 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Boutin, C., & Doucet, C. (2002). Understanding and treating pathological gamblers. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Papineau, E., & Chevalier, S. (2003). Évaluation du programme expérimental sur le jeu pathologique. Rapport 3. Revue critique de la littérature portant sur les évaluations d’intervention préventives. Institut Nationale de Santé Publique du Québec, QC, Canada.Google Scholar
  9. Responsible Gambling Council. (2006). Reaching people where they play: On-site support and assistance across Canada [Electronic version]. Newslink, Fall/Winter 2006. Retrieved October 20, 2008, from
  10. Responsible Gambling Council. (2008). From enforcement to assistance: Evolving best practices in self-exclusion. Discussion Paper by the Responsible Gambling Council, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  11. Rooney, B. L., & Murray, D. M. (1996). A meta-analysis of smoking prevention programs after adjustment for errors in the unit of analysis. Health Education Quaterly, 23, 48–64.Google Scholar
  12. Steenbergh, T. A., Whelan, J. P., Meyers, A. W., May, R. K., & Floyd, K. (2004). Impact of warning and brief intervention messages on knowledge of gambling risk, irrational beliefs and behaviour. International Gambling Studies, 4(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. The Osborne Group. (2007). Responsible Gaming Information Centres: 2007 evaluation. Report prepared for the Responsible Gambling Council, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  14. Tremblay, N., Boutin, C., & Ladouceur, R. (2008). Improved self-exclusion program: Preliminary results. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(4), 505–518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Turner, N. E., Wiebe, J., Falkowski-Ham, A., Kelly, J., & Skinner, W. (2005). Public awareness of responsible gambling and gambling behaviours in Ontario. International Gambling Studies, 5(1), 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Williams, R. J., West, B. L., & Simpson, R. I. (2007). Prevention of problem gambling: A comprehensive review of the evidence. Report prepared for the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre, Guelph, ON.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claude Boutin
    • 1
  • Nicole Tremblay
    • 1
  • Robert Ladouceur
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyLaval UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations