The Validity and Reliability of Four Measures of Gambling Behaviour in a Sample of Singapore University Students
- 406 Downloads
The primary aim of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of measures for detecting problem gamblers for use with university students in a Singapore context. The four instruments commonly used in gambling research, the DSM-IV, GA-20, SOGS and CPGI were administered to a sample of students (n = 193) from a representative cross section of faculties from one university. The CPGI was found to be the most reliable (α = 0.922) and valid in terms of construct validity as demonstrated by factor analysis. Despite being a lengthy instrument it is recommended that future studies such as randomized controlled trials of problem gambling interventions in Singapore adopt a modified version of the CPGI, made simpler and easier to use with fewer items and more appropriate terminology.
KeywordsGambling Validity Reliability DSM-IV GA-20 SOGS CPGI Psychometric property
The financial support came from Cross-Faculty Research Grant approved by National University of Singapore. The research team would like to thank Dr. Tony Chan Moon Fai (BSc, PhD, CStat, Assistant Professor of School of the Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore) for his advice on statistical analysis. The research team would also like to express gratitude to Ms Jean Thng of ALCNS (Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore) for her assistance in recruiting some of the participants, and as well as to the students who participated in this research.
- American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Beaudoin, C. M., & Cox, B. J. (1999). Characteristics of problem gambling in a Canadian context: A preliminary study using a DSM-IV based questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 483–487.Google Scholar
- Boardman, B., Jones, J., Perry, J., & Wood, M. (2003). Compulsive gambling in Kentucky. Legislative Research Commission. Available from URL: www.lrc.ky.gov.
- Cheung, K., Arthur, D., Chan, K. S., Choi, M. K., Ip, Y. C., Kei, K. Y., et al. (2005). A pilot study on gambling behaviours among university students in Hong Kong. In Paper presented at The Third Pan-Pacific Nursing Conference & The Fifth Hong Kong Nursing Symposium on Cancer Care: Excellence in Nursing Practice Innovation and Creativity, 11–12 November 2005.Google Scholar
- Custer, R. L., & Custer, L. F. (1978, December). Characteristics of the recovering compulsive gambler. In Paper presented at the Forth Annual Conference on Problem Gambling, Reno, Nevada.Google Scholar
- Currie, S. R., Hodgings, D. C., Wang, J. L., el-Guebaly, N., Wynne, H., & Chen, S. (2006). Risk of harm among gamblers in the general population as a function of level of participation in gambling activities. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 101, 570–580. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01392.x.Google Scholar
- de Leeuw, J. (2006). Principal component analysis of binary data, applications to roll-call analysis. http://gifi.stat.ucla.edu. Accessed on 26 March 2008.
- Ferris, J & Wyne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, February.Google Scholar
- Gerstein, D. R., Volberg, R. A., Toce, M. T., Harwood, R., et al. (1999). Gambling impact and behaviour study: Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Centre at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
- Ladoucer, R., Dube, D., & Bujold, A. (1994). Prevalence of pathological gambling and related problems among college students in the Quebec metropolitan area. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 289–293.Google Scholar
- Ladoucer, R., Jacques, C., Chevalier, S., Sevigny, S., Hamel, D., & Allard, D. (2004). Prevalence of gambling habits and problem gambling in Quebec 2002. Québec et Montréal: Université Laval et Institut national de santé public du Québec.Google Scholar
- Marshall, K., & Wynne, H. (2003). Fighting the odds. Perspectives on labour and income. Statistic Canada, 12(4), 5–13.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Community Youth & Sports. (2005). More than half of Singapore gambles; but only 2 in 100 at risk of gambling addiction. Ministry of Community, Youth & Sport. Available from URL: www.mcys.gov.sg.
- Ministry of Community, Youth & Sports. (2008). Report of survey on participation in gambling activities among Singapore residents. MCYS, May.Google Scholar
- National Council on Problem Gambling. (2007). In Survey on the perceptions and attitudes towards gambling issues. Report by NCPG, October.Google Scholar
- Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Oakley-Browne, M. A., Adams, P., & Mobberly, P. M. (2003). Interventions for pathological gambling (Cochrane review). In The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003. Oxford: Update Software.Google Scholar
- Schrans, T., & Schellink, T. (2004). 2003 Nova Scotia gambling prevalence study. Nova Scotia Office of Health Promotion, Available from URL: www.gov.ns.ca.
- Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vander, B. J. (1997). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behaviour in the United States and Canada: A meta-analysis. Boston: Harvard Medical School, Division of Addictions.Google Scholar
- Smith, G. J., & Wynne, H. (2002). Measuring gambling and problem gambling in Alberta. Using the Canadian Problem Gambling Index (CPGI). Alberta Gaming Research Institute, Available from URL: www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca.
- Uebersax, J. S. (2000). Binary factor analysis and multidimensional latent trait/item response theory (IRT) models. http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/jsuebersax/binary.htm. Accessed on 29 March 2008.
- Wiebe, J., Single, E., & Falkowski-Ham, A. (2001). Measuring gambling and problem gambling on Ontario. Ontario, Canada: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse and Responsible Gambling Council.Google Scholar