Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 519–534 | Cite as

Parameters for Safer Gambling Behavior: Examining the Empirical Research

  • Allyson J. Peller
  • Debi A. LaPlante
  • Howard J. Shaffer
Original Paper

Abstract

There have been claims that new gambling technology is hazardous to player health, and that technological interventions can alleviate gambling-related harm. In this paper, we systematically review the empirical research about the nexus between gambling and technology to evaluate the veracity of these claims. We use a public health perspective (i.e., the Epidemiologic Triangle) to organize and present study results (i.e., agent, host, and environment). This review intends to offer insight about emerging technology and identify areas that indicate a need for additional research. Forty-seven studies met our inclusion and exclusion criteria; a review of this body of work shows that attempts to develop and implement safety features for new gambling technology are promising, but methodologically are rudimentary and limited in scope. Increased attention to the dynamic interaction among host, agent, and environment factors hold potential to advance the field. In addition, improved study methods (e.g., longitudinal analyses of actual betting behavior), and collaboration among policymakers, manufacturers, and researchers can increase understanding of how new gambling technology affects the public health and stimulate new strategies for implementing effective public health interventions.

Keywords

Gambling Technology Product safety Public health Gaming 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Bwin.com Interactive Entertainment AG provided primary support for this study. The Division on Addictions also receives support from the National Center for Responsible Gaming, the National Institute on Alcohol and Alcohol Abuse, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, the Massachusetts Council on Compulsive Gambling, the Nevada Department of Public Health, and others. The authors extend special thanks to Chrissy Thurmond, Richard LaBrie, Sarah Nelson, and Leslie Bosworth for their support and work on this project. Ms. Peller, Dr. LaPlante, and Dr. Shaffer take responsibility for the integrity of the systematic review.

References

References marked with an asterisk indicate references that meet inclusion and exclusion criteria for the systematic review.

  1. Armes, A. (2005). National seat belt usage at record 82 percent. Safety & Health, 172(6), 16–16.Google Scholar
  2. *Baron, E., & Dickerson, M. (1999). Alcohol consumption and self-control of gambling behaviour. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15(1), 3–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benhsain, K., Taillefer, A., & Ladouceur, R. (2004). Awareness of independence of events and erroneous perceptions while gambling. Addictive Behaviors, 29(2), 399–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkson, J. (1946). Limitations of the application of fourfold tables to hospital data. Biometrics Bulletin, 2(3), 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaszczynski, A., Sharpe, L., & Walker, M. (2003). Harm minimization strategies and gambling: An overview of international interventions. Westmead: Westmead Hospital.Google Scholar
  6. *Blaszczynski, A., Sharpe, L., Walker, M., Shannon, K., & Coughlan, M.-J. (2005). Structural characteristics of electronic gaming machines and satisfaction of play among recreational and problem gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 5(2), 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. *Bridges, F. S., & Williamson, C. B. (2004). Legalized gambling and crime in Canada. Psychological Reports, 95(3), 747–753.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. *Brown, S. L., Rodda, S., & Phillips, J. G. (2004). Differences between problem and nonproblem gamblers in subjective arousal and affective valence amongst electronic gaming machine players. Addictive Behaviors, 29(9), 1863–1867.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bulkeley, W. M. (1995, August 16). Feeling luck? Electronics is bringing gambling into homes, restaurants and planes. Wall Street Journal, pp. 1, A7.Google Scholar
  10. Cantinotti, M., & Ladouceur, R. (2008). Harm reduction and electronic gambling machines: Does this pair make a happy couple or is divorce foreseen? Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(1), 39–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2007). Understanding the epidemiologic triangle through infectious disease. http://www.bam.gov/teachers/activities/epi_1_triangle.pdf. Retrieved 20 Sept 2007.
  12. Christian Capital Advisers, I. (2006). Global internet gambling revenue estimates and projections (2001–2010, $M, US). http://www.cca-i.com/Primary%20Navigation/Online%20Data%20Store/internet_gambling_data.htm.
  13. *Christopherson, K. M., & Weatherly, J. N. (2006). The effect of visual complexity when playing a slot-machine simulation: The role of computer experience, computer anxiety, and optimism. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 1072–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. *Cloutier, M., Ladouceur, R., & Sevigny, S. (2006). Responsible gambling tools: Pop-up messages and pauses on video lottery terminals. Journal of Psychology, 140(5), 434–438.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. *Côté, D., Caron, A., Aubert, J., Desrochers, V., & Ladouceur, R. (2003). Near wins prolong gambling on a video lottery terminal. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19(4), 433–438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coventry, K. R., & Hudson, J. (2001). Gender differences, psysiological arousal and the role of winning in fruit machine gamblers. Addiction, 96(6), 871–879.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crockford, D. N., Goodyear, B., Edwards, J., Quickfall, J., & el-Guebaly, N. (2005). Cue-induced brain activity in pathological gamblers. Biological Psychiatry, 58(10), 787–795.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Custer, R., & Milt, H. (1985). When luck runs out. New York: Facts on File.Google Scholar
  19. Dickerson, M. G. (1984). Compulsive gamblers. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  20. Dickerson, M., & O’Connor, J. (2006). Gambling as an addictive behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Dickson, L. (2004). Youth gambling problems: A harm reduction prevention model. Addiction Research and Theory, 12(4), 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. *Diskin, K. M., & Hodgins, D. C. (1999). Narrowing of attention and dissociation in pathological video lottery gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15(1), 17–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. *Diskin, K. M., & Hodgins, D. C. (2001). Narrowed focus and dissociative experiences in a community sample of experienced video lottery gamblers. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33(1), 58–64.Google Scholar
  24. Dixon, M. R. (2000). Manipulating the illusion of control: Variations in gambling as a function of perceived control over chance outcomes. Psychological Record, 50(4), 705–719.Google Scholar
  25. *Doiron, J. P., & Mazer, D. B. (2001). Gambling with video lottery terminals. Qualitative Health Research, 11(5), 631–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. *Doiron, J. P., & Nicki, R. M. (2001). Epidemiology of problem gambling in Prince Edward Island: A Canadian microcosm? The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46(5), 413–417.Google Scholar
  27. *Dowling, N., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: Are they the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling? Addiction, 100, 33–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. *Ellery, M., Stewart, S. H., & Loba, P. (2005). Alcohol’s effects on video lottery terminal (VLT) play among probable pathological and non-pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(3), 299–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Federal Trade Commission (2003). Online gambling and kids: A bad bet. http://www.ftc.gov/gamble. Retrieved 20 Dec 2003.
  30. Finlay, K., Kanetkar, V., Londerville, J., & Marmurek, H. H. C. (2006). The physical and psychological measurement of gambling environments. Environment and Behavior, 38(4), 570–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Finlay, K., Marmurek, H. H. C., Kanetkar, V., & Londerville, J. (2007). Trait and state emotion congruence in simulated casinos: Effects on at-risk gambling intention and restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(2), 166–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gackenbach, J. (Ed.). (2007). Psychology and the internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Inc.Google Scholar
  33. *Gilliland, J. A., & Ross, N. A. (2005). Opportunities for video lottery terminal gambling in Montreal: An environmental analysis. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96(1), 55–59.Google Scholar
  34. Green, P. E., & Woodrooffe, J. (2006). The estimated reduction in the odds of loss-of-control type crashes for sport utility vehicles equipped with electronic stability control. Journal of Safety Research, 37(5), 493–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Griffiths, M. (1993). Tolerance in gambling: An objective measure using the psychophysiological analysis of male fruit machine gamblers. Addictive Behaviors, 18(3), 365–372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hasbrook, A. H. (1956). The historical development of the crash-impact engineering point of view. Clinical Orthopaedics, 8, 268–274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. *Johansson, A., & Gotestam, K. G. (2004). Problems with computer games without monetary reward: Similarity to pathological gambling. Psychological Reports, 95(2), 641–650.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. *Joukhador, J., Blaszczynski, A., & Maccallum, F. (2004). Superstitious beliefs in gambling among problem and non-problem gamblers: Preliminary data. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(2), 171–180.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kassinove, J. I., & Schare, M. L. (2001). Effects of the “near miss” and the “big win” on persistence at slot machine gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15(2), 155–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. *Kerber, C. S. (2005). Problem and pathological gambling among college athletes. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 17(4), 243–247.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kipnis, D. (1997). Ghosts, taxonomies, and social psychology. American Psychologist, 52(3), 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. *Ko, C. H., Yen, J. Y., Chen, C. C., Chen, S. H., & Yen, C. F. (2005). Gender differences and related factors affecting online gaming addiction among Taiwanese adolescents. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 193(4), 273–277.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. *Kweitel, R., & Allen, F. (2000). Electronic gaming machines: Is there a problem? North American Journal of Psychology, 2(1), 167–178.Google Scholar
  44. *Kyngdon, A., & Dickerson, M. (1999). An experimental study of the effect of prior alcohol consumption on a simulated gambling activity. Addiction, 94(5), 697–707.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. *LaBrie, R. A., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., Schumann, A., & Shaffer, H. J. (2007). Assessing the playing field: A prospective longitudinal study of internet sports gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(3), 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. *Ladd, G. T., & Petry, N. M. (2002). Disordered gambling among university-based medical and dental patients: A focus on internet gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behavior, 16(1), 76–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. *Ladouceur, R., Boisvert, J.-M., & Dumont, J. (2004). Cognitive-behavioral treatment for adolescent pathological gamblers. Behavior Modification, 18(2), 230–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. *Ladouceur, R., & Sevigny, S. (2005). Structural characteristics of video lotteries: Effects of a stopping device on illusion of control and gambling persistence. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(2), 117–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. LaPlante, D. A., Schumann, A., LaBrie, R. A., Nelson, S. E., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Population trends in internet sports gambling. Computers in Human Behavior. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.015.
  50. Last, J. M. (Ed.). (2001). A dictionary of epidemiology (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Ledgerwood, D. M., & Petry, N. M. (2005). Current trends and future directions in the study of psychosocial treatments for pathological gambling. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. *Loba, P., Stewart, S. H., Klein, R. M., & Blackburn, J. R. (2001). Manipulations of the features of standard video lottery terminal (VLT) games: Effects in pathological and non-pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(4), 297–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. MacLin, O. H., Dixon, M. R., & Hayes, L. J. (1999). A computerized slot machine simulation to investigate the variables involved in gambling behavior. Behavior Research Methods. Instruments & Computers, 31(4), 731–734.Google Scholar
  54. *Marshall, D. (2005). The gambling environment and gambler behaviour: Evidence from Richmond-Tweed, Australia. International Gambling Studies, 5(1), 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. *Mitchell, K. J., & Wells, M. (2007). Problematic internet experiences: Primary or secondary presenting problems in persons seeking mental health care? Social Science Medicine, 65(6), 1136–1141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. *Moodie, C., & Finnigan, F. (2005). A comparison of the autonomic arousal of frequent, infrequent and non-gamblers while playing fruit machines. Addiction, 100(1), 51–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Motao, Z., Cummings, P., Haitao, C., & Cook, L. J. (2007). Association of rear seat safety belt use with death in a traffic crash: A matched cohort study. Injury Prevention, 13(3), 183–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2006). Summary of vehicle occupant protection laws. http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/airbags/VehOccProtectionLaws.pdf. Retrieved 19 Oct 2007.
  59. Nelson, S. E., LaPlante, D. A., Peller, A. J., Schumann, A., LaBrie, R. A., & Shaffer, H. J. (in press). Real limits in the virtual world: Self-limiting behavior of internet gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies.Google Scholar
  60. *Nisbet, S. L. (2005). Alternative gaming machine payment methods in Australia: Current knowledge and future implications. International Gambling Studies, 5(2), 229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. *Nisbet, S. L. (2006). Modelling consumer intention to use gambling technologies: An innovative approach. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(3), 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nova Scotia Gaming Corporation (2006). NSGC announces pilot test of internet gambling software. http://www.nsgc.ca/news.php?news_id=7. Retrieved 20 Sept 2007.
  63. *O’Connor, J., & Dickerson, M. (2003). Definition and measurement of chasing in off-course betting and gaming machine play. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19(4), 359–386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. *Pelletier, M.-F., & Ladouceur, R. (2007). The effect of knowledge of mathematics on gambling behaviours and erroneous perceptions. International Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 134–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. *Petry, N. M. (2006). Internet gambling: An emerging concern in family practice medicine? Family Practice, 23(4), 421–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reid, R. (1986). The psychology of the near miss. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2, 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. *Rockloff, M. J., & Dyer, V. (2007). An experiment on the social facilitation of gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(1), 1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. *Rockloff, M. J., Signal, T., & Dyer, V. (2007). Full of sound and fury, signifying something: The impact of autonomic arousal on EGM gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(4), 457–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. *Rodda, S., Brown, S. L., & Phillips, J. G. (2004). The relationship between anxiety, smoking, and gambling in electronic gaming machine players. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(1), 71–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ruff, C., Jost, T., & Eichberger, A. (2007). Simulation of an airbag deployment in out-of-position situations. Vehicle System Dynamics, 45(10), 953–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schreiber, J., & Dixon, M. R. (2001). Temporal characteristics of slot machine play in recreational gamblers. Psychological Reports, 89(1), 67–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schumann, A., LaPlante, D. A., Nelson, S. E., LaBrie, R. A., Bosworth, L., & Shaffer, H. J. (2008). Effects of deposit limits on actual internet sports gambling behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  73. *Sevigny, S., Cloutier, M., Pelletier, M.-F., & Ladouceur, R. (2005). Internet gambling: Misleading payout rates during the ‘demo’ period. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(1), 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shaffer, H. J. (1996). Understanding the means and objects of addiction: Technology, the internet and gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(4), 461–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shaffer, H. J., & Korn, D. A. (2002). Gambling and related mental disorders: A public health analysis. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 171–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shaffer, H. J., LaBrie, R. A., & LaPlante, D. A. (2004). Laying the foundation for quantifying regional exposure to social phenomena: Considering the case of legalized gambling as a public health toxin. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(1), 40–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shaffer, H. J., Stanton, M. V., & Nelson, S. E. (2006). Trends in gambling studies research: Quantifying, categorizing, and describing citations. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(4), 427–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sharpe, L. (2004). Patterns of autonomic arousal in imaginal situations of winning and losing in problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(1), 95–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sharpe, L., Tarrier, N., Schotte, D., & Spence, S. H. (1995). The role of autonomic arousal in problem gambling. Addiction, 90(11), 1529–1540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. *Sharpe, L., Walker, M., Coughlan, M.-J., Enersen, K., & Blaszczynski, A. (2005). Structural changes to electronic gaming machines as effective harm minimization strategies for non-problem and problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(4), 503–520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shladover, S., & Tan, S.-K. (2006). Analysis of vehicle positioning accuracy requirements for communication-based cooperative collision warning. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 10(3), 131–140.Google Scholar
  82. Silver, G. (1979). The dope chronicles: 1850–1950. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  83. *Smeaton, M., & Griffiths, M. (2004). Internet gambling and social responsibility: An exploratory study. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(1), 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Steenbergh, T. A. (2001). A laboratory study of the relationship between gambling-related irrational beliefs and gambling behavior. ProQuest Information & Learning.Google Scholar
  85. *Stewart, S. H., Collins, P., Blackburn, J. R., Ellery, M., & Klein, R. M. (2005). Heart rate increase to alcohol administration and video lottery terminal (VLT) play among regular VLT players. Psychology of Addictive Behavior, 19(1), 94–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. *Stewart, S. H., McWilliams, L. A., Blackburn, J. R., & Klein, R. M. (2002). A laboratory-based investigation of relations among video lottery terminal (VLT) play, negative mood, and alcohol consumption in regular VLT players. Addictive Behaviors, 27(5), 819–835.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. *Stewart, S. H., Peterson, J. B., Collins, P., Eisnor, S., & Ellery, M. (2006). Heart rate increase to alcohol administration and video lottery terminal play among probable pathological gamblers and nonpathological gamblers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 20(1), 53–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. The National Coalition Against Legalized Gambling (2007). Internet gambling: The ‘perfect storm’ of harm [Electronic Version]. http://www.ncalg.org/internet%20gambling.htm. Retrieved 30 Apr 2008.
  89. Tolchard, B., Thomas, L., & Battersby, M. (2006). Single-session exposure therapy for problem gambling: A single-case experimental design. Behaviour Change, 23(2), 148–155.Google Scholar
  90. Treisman, M., & Faulker, A. (1987). Generation of random sequences by human subjects: Cognitive operations or psychophysical process? Journal of Experiment Psychology: General, 116, 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. *Trevorrow, K., & Moore, S. (1998). The association between loneliness, social isolation and women’s electronic gaming machine gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14(3), 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Volberg, R. A., & Dickerson, M. G. (1996). Prevalence studies and the development of services for problem gamblers and their families. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12(2), 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. *Wheeler, S. A., Round, D. K., Sarre, R., & O’Neil, M. (2007). The influence of gaming expenditure on crime rates in South Australia: A local area empirical investigation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24(1), 1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. *Wilson, D. H., Gilliland, J., Ross, N. A., Derevensky, J., & Gupta, R. (2006). Video lottery terminal access and gambling among high school students in Montreal. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 97(3), 202–206.Google Scholar
  95. Wohl, M. J. A., & Enzle, M. E. (2002). The deployment of personal luck: Sympathetic magic and illusory control in games of pure chance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1388–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wong, S. H., Cowen, Z., Allen, E. A., & Newman, P. K. (2007). Internet gambling and other pathological gambling in Parkinson’s disease: A case series. Movement Disorders, 22(4), 591–593.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. *Wood, R. T., & Griffiths, M. D. (2004). Adolescent lottery and scratchcard players: Do their attitudes influence their gambling behaviour? Journal of Adolescence, 27(4), 467–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. *Wood, R. T., Griffiths, M. D., & Parke, J. (2007). Acquisition, development, and maintenance of online poker playing in a student sample. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10(3), 354–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. *Woodruff, C., & Gregory, S. (2005). Profile of internet gamblers: Betting on the future. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 9(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  100. Zinberg, N. E. (1984). Drug, set, and setting: The basis for controlled intoxicant use. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Zinberg, N. E., & Shaffer, H. J. (1985). The social psychology of intoxicant use: The interaction of personality and social setting. In H. B. Milkman & H. J. Shaffer (Eds.), The addictions: Multidisciplinary perspectives and treatments. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allyson J. Peller
    • 1
  • Debi A. LaPlante
    • 1
    • 2
  • Howard J. Shaffer
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Division on AddictionsCambridge Health AllianceMedfordUSA
  2. 2.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations