Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 457–465 | Cite as

Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Something: The Impact of Autonomic Arousal on EGM Gambling

  • Matthew Justus Rockloff
  • Tania Signal
  • Victoria Dyer
Original Paper


An experiment was conducted to observe the influence of autonomic arousal on subsequent gambling behavior. Thirty-seven male and 32 female regular Electronic Gaming Machine (EGM) players were recruited through newspaper advertisements. Participants were randomly assigned to either: (1) a control condition, or (2) an experimental condition that introduced a loud white-noise event (80 db) at fixed 120 s intervals throughout the 5-min EGM gambling session. Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) measurements showed that the manipulation was successful in elevating autonomic arousal. The results showed differences in behavioral response to the manipulation based on prior experience with gambling problems. Persons with many gambling problems had lower average bet-sizes in the white-noise condition compared to the control, while those with few or no problems had higher average bet-sizes. The results suggest that arousal may provide different signals to gamblers with few versus many problems. Gamblers with many problems may interpret their arousal as a sign that they will soon lose money, while gamblers with few or no problems may associate feelings of arousal exclusively with winning.


Gambling Pathological gambling Physiological arousal Sensation seeking Affect 



This research was supported by a grant from the Queensland Treasury Department, Australia.


  1. Anderson, G., & Brown, R. I. (1984). Real and laboratory gambling, sensation-seeking and arousal. British Journal of Psychology, 75(3), 401–410.Google Scholar
  2. Baum, W. M. (1994). Understanding behaviorism: Science, behaviour, and culture. NY: HarperCollins College Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, R. I. (1986). Arousal and sensation-seeking components in the general explanation of gambling and gambling addictions. International Journal of the Addictions, 21(9–10), 1001–1016.Google Scholar
  4. Cahill, L., & Alkire, M. T. (2002). Epinephrine enhancement of human memory consolidation: Interaction with arousal at encoding. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 79, 194–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coventry, K., & Constable, B. (1999). Physiological arousal and sensation-seeking in female fruit machine gamblers. Addiction, 94(3), 425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coventry, K. R., & Hudson, J. (2001). Gender differences, physiological arousal and the role of winning in fruit machine gamblers. Addiction, 96, 871–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dickerson, M., & Baron, E. (2000). Contemporary issues and future directions for research into pathological gambling. Addiction, 95, 1145–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final Report: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.Google Scholar
  9. Freidenberg, B. M., Blanchard, E. B., Wulfert, E., & Malta, L. S. (2002). Changes in physiological arousal to gambling cues among participants in motivationally enhanced cognitive-behavior therapy for pathological gambling: A preliminary study. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 27(4), 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gooding, D. C., Davidson, R. J., Putnam, K. M., & Tallent, K. A. (2002). Normative emotion-modulated startle response in individuals at risk for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Schizophrenia Research, 57, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Groeppel-Klein, A. (2005). Arousal and consumer in-store behavior. Brain Research Bulletin, 67, 428–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rockloff, M. J., & Dyer, V. (2006). The Four Es of problem gambling: A psychological measure of risk. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(1), 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rockloff, M. J., & Dyer, V. (2007). An experiment on the social facilitation of gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Studies. Retrieved February 19, 2007, from SpringerLink database (in press).Google Scholar
  14. Sharpe, L. (2004). Patterns of autonomic arousal in imaginal situations of winning and losing in problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20(1), 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tracy, J. I., Mohamed, F., Faro, S., Tiver, R., Pinus, A., Bloomer, A. P., & Harvan, J. (2000). The effect of autonomic arousal on attentional focus. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 11(18), 4037–4042.Google Scholar
  16. Vrana, S. R., Spence, E. L., & Lang, P. J. (1988). The startle probe response: A new measure of emotion? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97(4), 487–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Weatherly, J. N., & Brandt, A. E. (2004). Participants sensitivity to percentage payback and credit value when playing a slot-machine simulation. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 33–50.Google Scholar
  18. Wulfert, E., Roland, B. D., Hartley, J., Wang, N., & Franco, C. (2005). Heart rate arousal and excitement in gambling: Winners versus losers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19(3), 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew Justus Rockloff
    • 1
  • Tania Signal
    • 1
  • Victoria Dyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and SociologyCentral Queensland UniversityBundabergAustralia

Personalised recommendations