Minimal Treatment Approaches for Concerned Significant Others of Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- 544 Downloads
The goal of this study was to examine the efficacy of minimal treatment interventions for concerned significant others (CSOs) of problem gamblers. One hundred and eighty-six participants (82% females, 56% spouses) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the first minimal intervention group received a self-help workbook [based on behavioral principles, modified from the Community Reinforcement and Family Therapy (CRAFT) model] and the second minimal intervention group received the workbook plus telephone support. The control condition received a treatment resource information package. Overall, all participants reported significant improvement in personal and relationship functioning and gambling behavior and consequences at the 3- and 6-month follow-up. The data demonstrated differences in favor of the interventions in three areas: days gambling, satisfaction with the program, and number who had their needs met. There was no difference in the number who had entered treatment. It may be that CSOs require more guidance and follow-up support to achieve these goals using the CRAFT procedures and strategies.
KeywordsConcerned significant others Gambling problems intervention Self-help workbook Community reinforcement and family training (CRAFT) Cognitive-behavioral treatment
This project was funded by the Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre. Kylie Thygesen did a superb job in coordinating the research team, which included Erin Cassidy, Susan Green, Adriana Sorbo, Steve Skitch, Stephen Rimac, and Renee Soenen. We would also like to thank the therapists, Gary Hoskins, Brian Carlson, & Janine Robinson, who were contracted from the Problem Gambling Project at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. Nina Littman-Sharp played a large role in coordinating this involvement. We would also like to thank the participants who gave freely of their time despite the struggles they were facing.
- Alcoholics Anonymous (1997). Al-Anon faces Alcoholism. New York: Alcoholics Anonymous.Google Scholar
- Derogatis, L. R. (1993). Brief symptom inventory—administration, scoring, and procedure manual. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar
- Hodgins, D. C., Shead, N. W., & Makarchuk, K. (2006). Distress among concerned significant others of pathological gamblers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195, 1–7.Google Scholar
- Johnson, V. E. (1986). Intervention: How to help those who don’t want help. Minneapolis: Johnson Institute.Google Scholar
- Lobsinger, C., & Beckett, L. (1996). Odds to break even: A practical approach to gambling awareness. Sydney: Relationships Australia.Google Scholar
- Meyers, R. J., & Smith, J. E. (1995). Clinical guide to alcohol treatment: The community reinforcement approach. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- National Gambling Impact Study Commission (1999). National gambling impact study commission final report. Retrieved from http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/ngisc/reports [On-line].Google Scholar
- Petry, N. M. (2005). Pathological gambling. Etiology, comorbidity, and treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Thomas, E. J., & Ager, R. D. (1993). Unilateral family therapy with spouses of uncooperative alcohol abusers. In T. G. O’Farrell (Ed.), Treating alcohol problems: Marital and family interventions. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar