Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 41–54 | Cite as

Does Providing Extended Relapse Prevention Bibliotherapy to Problem Gamblers Improve Outcome?

  • David C. Hodgins
  • Shawn R. Currie
  • Nady el-Guebaly
  • Katherine M. Diskin
Originala Paper


Relapse rates among pathological gamblers are high with as many as 75% of gamblers returning to gambling shortly after a serious attempt to quit. The present study focused on providing a low cost, easy to access relapse prevention program to such individuals. Based on information collected in our ongoing study of the process of relapse, a series of relapse prevention booklets were developed and evaluated. Individuals who had recently quit gambling (N = 169) were recruited (through media announcements) and randomly assigned to a single mailing condition in which they received one booklet summarizing all of the relapse prevention information or a repeated mailing condition in which they received the summary booklet plus 7 additional booklets mailed to them at regular intervals over the course of a year period. Gambling involvement over the course of the 12-month follow-up period, confirmed by family or friends, was compared between the two groups. Results indicated that participants receiving the repeated mailings were more likely to meet their goal, but they did not differ from participants receiving the single mailing in frequency of gambling or extent of gambling losses. The results of this project suggest that providing extended relapse prevention bibliotherapy to problem gamblers does not improve outcome. However, providing the overview booklet may be a low cost, easy to access alternative for individuals who have quit gambling.


Relapse prevention Brief treatment Bibliotherapy Intervention Pathological gambling 



This project was made possible with funding support from the Alberta Gaming Research Institute. We would like to thank Nicole Peden, Karyn Makarchuk, and Susan Green for working with us to write the workbooks. Nicole Peden and Erin Cassidy were responsible for data collection. Finally, we would like to thank the participants who gave freely of their time despite the struggles they were facing.


  1. Brandon, T. H., Collins, B. N., Juliano, L. M., & Leavey, S. B. (2000). Preventing relapse among former smokers: A comparison of minimal interventions through telephone and mail. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crockford, D. N., & el-Guebaly, N. (1998). Psychiatric comorbidity in pathological gambling: A critical review. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 43–50.Google Scholar
  4. Gerstein, D., Murphy, S., Toce, M., Hoffman, J., Palmer, A., Johnson, R. et al. (1999). Gambling impact and behaviour study: Report of the national gambling impact study commission.Google Scholar
  5. Hodgins D. C. (2004). Workbooks for individuals with gambling problems: Promoting the Natural recovery process through brief intervention. In L’Abate L. (Ed.), Using workbooks in mental health: Resources in prevention, psychotherapy, and rehabilitation for clinicians and researchers (pp. 159–172). Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Reference Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hodgins, D. C., Currie, S. R., el-Guebaly, N., & Peden, N. (2004). Brief motivational treatment for problem gambling: 24 month follow-up. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18, 293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hodgins, D. C., Currie, S. R., & el-Guebaly, N. (2001). Motivational enhancement and self-help treatments for problem gambling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hodgins, D. C., & el-Guebaly, N. (2000). Natural and treatment-assisted recovery from gambling problems: A comparison of resolved and active gamblers. Addiction, 95, 777–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hodgins, D. C., & el-Guebaly, N. (2004). Retrospective and prospective reports of precipitants to relapse in pathological gambling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 72–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hodgins, D. C., & Makarchuk, K. (2003). Trusting problem gamblers: Reliability and validity of self-reported gambling behavior. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 17, 244–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hodgins, D. C., Peden, N., & Cassidy, E. (2005). The association between comorbidity and outcome in pathological gambling: A prospective follow-up of recent quitters. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hodgins, D. C., Peden, N., & Makarchuk, K. (2004). Self-efficacy in Pathological Gambling Treatment Outcome: Development of a Gambling Abstinence Self-efficacy Scale (GASS). International Gambling Studies, 4, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hodgins, D. C., & Petry N. M. (2004). Cognitive and behavioral treatments. In J. E. Grant, & M. N. Potenza (Eds.), Pathological gambling. A clinical guide to treatment (pp. 169–188). New York: American Psychiatric Association Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hodgins, D. C., Wynne, H., & Makarchuk, K. (1999). Pathways to recovery from gambling problems: Follow-up from a general population survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.Google Scholar
  16. McCown, W. G., & Chamberlain, L. L. (2000). Best possible odds. contemporary treatment strategies for gambling disorders. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  17. Petry, N. M. (2005). Pathological gambling. Etiology, comorbidity, and treatment. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  18. Radloff, L. H. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.Google Scholar
  19. Sanchez-Craig, M., Davila, R., & Cooper, G. (1996). A self-help approach for high risk drinking: Effect of an initial assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 694–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sylvain, C., Ladouceur, R., & Boisvert, J. (1997). Cognitive and behavioral treatment of pathological gambling: a controlled study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 727–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • David C. Hodgins
    • 1
  • Shawn R. Currie
    • 1
  • Nady el-Guebaly
    • 2
  • Katherine M. Diskin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations