Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 299–308 | Cite as

The South Oaks Gambling Screen-revised Adolescent (SOGS-RA) Revisited: A Cut-point Analysis

  • Brock Boudreau
  • Christiane Poulin
Original paper

Abstract

The lack of a criterion validity gold standard defining adolescent pathological gambling represents a major limitation of the adolescent gambling literature. The present study employed Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis (ROC) to examine the performance of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised Adolescent (SOGS-RA) recommended cut-point of 4 against two-proxy gold standards: self-identified need for, or receipt of, help for gambling. Logistic regression analysis examined the correlates of self-identified need for help with gambling. The sample was comprised of 12990 adolescents from Atlantic Canada whose average age was 15 years and 50% of whom were male. The SOGS-RA performed as well or better with these proxy gold standards than with proxies used in previous studies. We concluded that the proxy gold standards based on self-identified need for or receipt of help represent a pragmatic solution to the lack of an adolescent-specific definition of problem or pathological gambling. Students in grade seven and SOGS-RA scores of 4 or greater were independent predictors of self-identifying a need for help.

Keywords

ROC SOGS-RA Adolescent gambling Criterion validity Problem gambling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a Canada Research Chair, a Canadian Population Health Initiative grant, and a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant MA-14706). Funding for data collection was provided in part by the provincial departments of Health in Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick, and Newfoundland and Labrador.

References

  1. Adlaf, E. M., Paglia-Boak, A., Beitchman, J. H., & Wolfe, D. (2006). The mental health and well-being of Ontario students 1991–2005 (CAMH Research Document Series No. 19). Toronto: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health.Google Scholar
  2. Alberta Alcohol and Drug Abuse Commission (AADAC). (2005). Youth gambling in Alberta: the Alberta youth experience survey 2002. Edmonton, Alberta: Author.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Cox, B. J., Yu, N., Afifi, T. O., & Ladouceur, R. (2005). A national survey of gambling problems in Canada. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50, 213–217.Google Scholar
  5. DiClemente, C. C., & Prochaska, J. O. (1999). Toward a comprehensive, transtheoretical model of change: Stages of change and addictive behaviors. In W. R. Miller & N. Heather (Eds.), Treating addictive behaviors (2nd ed. pp. 3–24). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  6. DiClemente, C. C., Story, H., & Murray, K. (2000). On a roll: the process of initiation and cessation of problem gambling among adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 289–313.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gupta, R., & Derevensky, J. L. (2000). Adolescents with gambling problems: from research to treatment. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 315–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hardoon, K., Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2003). Empirical measures vs. perceived gambling severity among youth: why adolescent problem gamblers fail to seek treatment. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 933–946.Google Scholar
  9. Jacobs, D. F. (1989). Illegal and undocumented: a review of teenage gamblers in America. In H. J. Shaffer, S. A. Stein, B. Gambino & T. N. Cummings (Eds.). Compulsive gambling: theory, research and practice. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  10. Jacobs, D. F. (2000). Juvenile gambling in North America: an analysis of long term trends and future prospects. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 119–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kezwer, G. (1995). Physicians say government-approved love affair with gambling sure bet to cause problems. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 154, 84–88.Google Scholar
  12. Ladouceur, R., Blaszczynski, A., & Pelletier, A. (2004). Why adolescent problem gamblers do not seek treatment? Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 13(4), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ladouceur, R., Ferland, F., Poulin, C., Vitaro, F., & Wiebe, J. (2005). Concordance between the SOGS-RA and the DSM-IV Criteria for pathological gambling among youth. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 271–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mackay, T-L., Patton, D., & Broszeit, B. (2005). Student gambling report, 2005. Retrieved September 19, 2006, from the Addictions Foundation of Manitoba website: http://www.afm.mb.ca/pdf/Student%20Gambling%20Report%202005.pdf.Google Scholar
  16. Poulin, C. (2000). Problem gambling among adolescent students in the Atlantic provinces of Canada. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 53–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Poulin, C. (2002). An assessment of the validity and reliability of the SOGS-RA. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 67–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Poulin, C., Hand, D., Boudreau, B., & Santor, D. (2005). Gender differences in the association between substance use and elevated depressive symptoms in a general adolescent population. Addiction, 100, 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Poulin, C., MacNeil, P., & Mitic, W. (1993). The validity of a province-wide student drug use survey: lessons in design. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 84, 259–264.Google Scholar
  20. Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1982). Transtheoretical therapy: toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 19, 276–288.Google Scholar
  21. Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vander Bilt, J. (1997). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behaviour in the United States and Canada: a meta-analysis. Boston, MA: Harvard Medical School Division of Addictions.Google Scholar
  22. StataCorp. (2005). Stata statistical software: Release 9.0. College Station, TX: Author.Google Scholar
  23. Wiebe, J. M. D., Cox, B. J., & Mehmel, B. G. (2000). The South Oaks Gambling Screen Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA): further psychometric findings from a community sample. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 275–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Winters, K. C., Stinchfield, R. D., & Fulkerson, J. (1993). Toward the development of an adolescent gambling problem severity scale. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Winters, K. C., Stinchfield, R. D., & Kim, L. G. (1995). Monitoring adolescent gambling in Minnesota. Journal of Gambling Studies, 11, 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Community Health and Epidemiology, Centre for Clinical ResearchDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations