Missouri Casino Self-Excluders: Distributions Across Time and Space
- 200 Downloads
According to public health research, exposure to casinos is a risk factor for disordered gambling. Consequently, casino self-exclusion programs, which provide gamblers with the opportunity to voluntarily seek limits on their access to gambling venues, can serve as a barometer of the concentration of disordered gambling in an area. This study reports on the distribution, both temporally and geographically, of 6,599 people who applied to exclude themselves from Missouri casinos between November, 1996 and February, 2004. Analyses used Microsoft MapPoint to plot the location of casinos and self-excluders (SEs) across Missouri and its constituent counties. These regional exposure analyses showed that the Western region around Kansas City is an epicenter of disordered gambling as, to a lesser extent, is the Eastern region around St. Louis. The annual number of SE enrollments increased during the first few years of the Missouri self-exclusion program and then leveled off during the later years. These findings have important implications for public health and the development of public health interventions for disordered gamblers.
KeywordsGambling Pathological gambling Self-exclusion
The authors thank the Missouri Gaming Commission’s Voluntary Exclusion Program for providing the information for this study, Bryan Nehl at the Missouri Gaming Commission for his help in facilitating the data transfer, Eric Fleegler for his assistance with the geocoding of gambling venues, and Christine Reilly and Christine Thurmond for their effective management of the project. This project was supported, in part, by grants from the Kansas City Community Foundation’s Port Authority Problem Gambling Fund, and the National Center for Responsible Gaming.
- American Gaming Association (2005). Responsible gaming rules of conduct. Retrieved June 9, 2005, from http://www.americangaming.org/programs/responsiblegaming/code_public.cfm.
- Jacobs, D. F. (1987). A general theory of addictions: Application to treatment and rehabilitation planning for pathological gamblers. In T. Galski (Ed.), The handbook of pathological gambling (pp. 169–194). Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
- Khantzian, E. J. (1975). Self selection and progression in drug dependence. Psychiatry Digest, 36, 19–22.Google Scholar
- Khantzian, E. J. (1997). The self-medication hypothesis of substance use disorders: A reconsideration and recent applications. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 4(5), 231–244.Google Scholar
- Korn, D. A. (2000). Expansion of gambling in Canada: Implications for health and social policy. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 163(1), 61–64.Google Scholar
- Korn, D. A., & Skinner, H. A. (2000, Autumn 2000). Gambling expansion in Canada: An emerging public health issue. CPHA Health Digest, XXIV, 10.Google Scholar
- McAuliffe, W. E., LaBrie, R. A., Lomuto, N., Pollock, N., Betjemann, R., & Fournier, E. A. (2000). Measuring interstate variations in problems related to alcohol use disorders. In R. Wilson & M. Dufour (Eds.), The epidemiology of alcohol problems in small geographic areas. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.Google Scholar
- McRae, J. A. Jr., Beebe, T. J., & Harrison, P. A. (2001). Estimating the prevalence of substance abuse with social indicators. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(4), 977–988.Google Scholar
- Mullaly K. (2003). Missouri gaming commission fund balance report—Fiscal Year 2003. Kansas City, Missouri: Missouri Gaming Commission.Google Scholar
- Nowatzki, N. R., & Williams, R. J. (2002). Casino self-exclusion programmes: A review of the issues. Inernational Gambling Studies, 2, 3–26.Google Scholar
- O’Neil, M., Whetton, S., Dolman, B., Herbert, M., Giannopoulos, V., O’Neil, D., et al. (2003). Gambling research panel report no. 2: Evaluation of self-exclusion programs (report). South Australian Centre for Economic Studies.Google Scholar
- Shaffer, H. J., & Hall, M. N. (2001). Updating and refining prevalence estimates of disordered gambling behaviour in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 92(3), 168–172.Google Scholar
- Shaffer H. J., LaBrie R. A., LaPlante D. A., & Kidman R. C. (2002). The Iowa Department of public health gambling treatment services: Four years of evidence (No. 101102–200). Boston: Division on Addiction, Harvard Medical School.Google Scholar
- Shaffer, H. J., LaBrie, R. A., Caro, G., LaPlante, D. A., & Nelson, S. E. (2004). Disordered gambling in Missouri: Regional differences in the need for treatment. Division on Addictions, Harvard Medical School.Google Scholar
- South Australian Centre for Economic Studies (2003). Evaluation of self-exclusion programs (Part A: Evaluation of self-exclusion programs in Victoria) (No. 2). Victoria, Australia: The Victorian Gambling Research Panel.Google Scholar
- United States Census Bureau (2000). United States Census 2000. Retrieved June, 2004, from http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html.Google Scholar
- Zand, D., Cho, D., Malmstrom, T., & Ho, L. (1998). Estimating substance abuse treatment needs using social indicators, 1993–1996 (Final Report). The Missouri Institute of Mental Health, Social Indicators Project Work Group.Google Scholar