Advertisement

Journal of Gambling Studies

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 23–39 | Cite as

Prevalence Estimates of Gambling Participation and Problem Gambling among 16–18-year-old Students in Iceland: A Comparison of the SOGS-RA and DSM-IV-MR-J

  • Daniel Thor Olason
  • Karen Julia Sigurdardottir
  • Jakob Smari
Article

The aim of this study was to estimate gambling participation and problem gambling among Icelandic adolescents. Participants were 750 16–18-year-old students, 371 girls and 379 boys. The rate of problem gambling was estimated with the SOGS-RA and DSM-IV-MR-J. Results indicated that 96% of adolescents had gambled in their lifetime, 79% at least once in the preceding year and about 10% gamble at least once a week. A psychometric evaluation of the two screening scales revealed satisfactory reliabilities and factor structures for both scales. The DSM-IV-MR-J identified 2% of the participants as problem gamblers while SOGS-RA identified 2.7%, and problem gambling was more common among boys than girls. It was concluded that problem gambling among adolescents is an area of concern for the Icelandic community that needs to be further investigated.

Keywords

adolescent gambling problem gambling SOGS-RA DSM-IV-MR-J 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The University Lottery supported this research project. The authors take full responsibility for all parts of the data collection, examination of the data and full control over the decision on publication. A preliminary version of this study was presented at the 27th Nordic Psychiatric Congress in Reykjavik, August 2003.

References

  1. Abbott M. W., Volberg R., Rönnberg S., (2004). Comparing the New Zealand and Swedish national surveys of gambling and problem gamblingJournal of Gambling Studies 20: 237–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Becoña E., (1997). Pathological gambling in Spanish children and adolescents: An emerging problemPsychological Reports 81:275–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Derevensky J. L., Gupta R., (2000). Prevalence estimates of adolescent gambling: A comparison of the SOGS-RA, DSM-IV-J, and the GA 20 QuestionsJournal of Gambling Studies 16: 227–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Derevensky J. L., Gupta R., Winters K., (2003). Prevalence rates of youth gambling problems: Are the current rates inflated?Journal of Gambling Studies 19:405–425CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fisher S., (1992). Measuring pathological gambling in children: The case of fruit machines in the U.KJournal of Gambling Studies 8: 263–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisher S., (1993). Gambling and pathological gambling in adolescentsJournal of Gambling Studies 9: 277–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisher S., (1999). A prevalence study of gambling and problem gambling in British adolescentsAddiction Research 7: 509–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher S., (2000). Developing the DSM-IV-MR-J criteria to identify adolescent problem gambling in non-clinical populationsJournal of Gambling Studies 16: 253–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerdner R., Svensson K., (2003). Predictors of gambling problems among male adolescentsInternational Journal of Social Welfare 12: 182–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Griffiths M., (1995). Adolescent gambling. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta R., Derevensky J. L., (1998). Adolescent gambling behavior: A prevalence study and examination of the correlates associated with problem gamblingJournal of Gambling Studies 14: 319–345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobs D. F., (2000). Juvenile gambling in North America: An analysis of long term trends and future prospectsJournal of Gambling Studies 16:119–152CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacobs D. F., (2004). Youth gambling in North America: Long-term trends and future prospects. In: Derevensky J., Gupta R., (Eds.), Gambling problems in youth: Theoretical and applied perspectives. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers pp. 1–24Google Scholar
  14. Johanson A., Götestam K. G., (2003). Gambling and problematic gambling with money among Norwegian youth (12–18 years)Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 57: 317–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ladouceur R., Boudreault N., Jacques C., Vitaro F., (1999). Pathological gambling and related problems among adolescentsJournal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse 8: 55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lesieur H. R., Blume S. B., (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblersAmerican Journal of Psychiatry 144: 1184–1188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Moore S. M., Ohtsuka K., (1999). Beliefs about control over gambling among young people, and their relation to problem gamblingPsychology of Addictive Behaviors 13: 339–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. National Research Council (NRC) (1999). Pathological gambling: A critical review. Washington DC: National Academy PressGoogle Scholar
  19. Olason, D. T., Finnbogadóttir, H., Hauksdóttir, M. A., & Bárudóttir, S.K. (2003). An Icelandic version of the Problem Gambling Severity Index: A psychometric evaluation. Paper presented at the 27th Nordic Psychiatric Congress, Reykjavik, IcelandGoogle Scholar
  20. Orford J., Sproston K., Erens B., White C., Mitchell L., (2003). Gambling and problem gambling in Britain. Hove: Brunner-RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Poulin C., (2000). Problem gambling among adolescent students in the Atlantic provinces of CanadaJournal of Gambling Studies 16: 53–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Poulin C., (2002). An assessment of the validity and the reliability of the SOGS-RAJournal of Gambling Studies 18: 67–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Raylu N., Oei T. P. S., (2002). Pathological gambling: A comprehensive reviewClinical Psychology Review 22: 1009–1061CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Shaffer H. J., Hall M. N., (1996). Estimating the prevalence of adolescent gambling disorders: A quantitative synthesis and guide toward standard gambling nomenclatureJournal of Gambling Studies 12: 193–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Volberg R. A., (2002). Gambling and problem gambling among adolescents in Nevada. Report to the Nevada Department of Human Resources. Northampton, MA: Gemini ResearchGoogle Scholar
  26. Westphal J. R., Rush J. A., Stevens L., Johnson L. J., (2000). Gambling behavior of Louisiana students in grades 6 through 12Psychiatric Services 51: 96–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wiebe J. M. D., Cox B. J., Mehmel B. G., (2000). The South Oaks Gambling Screen Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA): Further psychometric findings from a community sampleJournal of Gambling Studies 16:275–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Winters K. C., Stinchfield R. D., Fulkerson J., (1993). Toward the development of an adolescent gambling problem severity scaleJournal of Gambling Studies 9:371–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Winters K. C., Stinchfield R. D., Kim L. G., (1995). Monitoring adolescent gambling in MinnesotaJournal of Gambling Studies 11:165–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wood T. A., Griffiths M. D., (1998). The acquisition, development and maintenance of lottery and scratchcard gambling in adolescenceJournal of Adolescence 21: 265–273CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Thor Olason
    • 1
    • 2
  • Karen Julia Sigurdardottir
    • 1
  • Jakob Smari
    • 1
  1. 1.University of IcelandOddiIceland
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Faculty of social SciencesUniversity of IcelandReykjavikIceland

Personalised recommendations