Skip to main content
Log in

“I Am Uncertain About What My Uncertainty Even Is”: Men’s Uncertainty and Information Management of Their BRCA-Related Cancer Risks

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

Men with a germline pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variant have increased risks for developing breast, pancreatic, prostate, and melanoma cancers, but little is known about how they understand and manage their cancer risks. This study examines how men with BRCA-related cancer risks manage uncertainty and information about their risks. Twenty-five men who were either a BRCA carrier or have a BRCA-positive first-degree family member that put the participant at 50% chance of also being a BRCA carrier were interviewed for this study. Using uncertainty management theory as a theoretical framework, this study demonstrates that men manage uncertainty by seeking information from female family members, websites, and healthcare providers, and are under-informed about their cancer risks. Further, in handling their information, men prefer information about cancer risk percentages and screening recommendations in the form of lists presented to them via websites, printed literature, proactive healthcare providers, and an identifiable male spokesperson. Finally, men used BRCA-related cancer risk information to make decisions about whether or not to engage in screening and prevention, manage their BRCA-related cancer risks, and overall family well-being—yet often at the expense of their own individual risks. Implications for genetic counseling and family conversations are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brashers, D. E. (2007). A theory of communication and uncertainty management. In B. Whaley & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication theory (pp. 201–218). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brashers, D. E., Goldsmith, D. J., & Hsieh, E. (2002). Information seeking and avoiding in health contexts. Human Communication Research, 28(2), 258–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brashers, D. E., Neidig, J. L., Haas, S. M., Dobbs, L. K., Cardillo, L. W., & Russell, J. A. (2000). Communication in the management of uncertainty: The case of persons living with HIV or AIDS. Communications Monographs, 67(1), 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brashers, D. E., Neidig, J. L., Cardillo, L. W., Dobbs, L. K., Russell, J. A., & Haas, S. M. (1999). “In an important way, I did die”: Uncertainty and revival in persons living with HIV or AIDS. AIDS Care, 11, 201–219.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, M., Lambert, S., Smits, R., Paul, C., Sanson-Fisher, R., & Clinton-McHarg, T. (2012). The unfulfilled promise: A systematic review of interventions to reduce the unmet supportive care needs of cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(2), 207–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control. (2018). Genetic testing. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/genomics/gtesting/genetic_testing.htm

  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (2016). “It’s not if I get cancer, it’s when I get cancer”: BRCA-positive patients’(un)certain health experiences regarding hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk. Social Science & Medicine, 163, 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M., Scherr, C. L., Clements, M., Koruo, R., Martinez, J., & Ross, A. (2017). “What information is not enough”: A model for understanding BRCA-positive previvors’ information needs regarding hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk. Patient Education and Counseling, 100, 1738–1743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galarce, E. M., Vishwanath, K., & Ramanadhan, S. (2011). Health information seeking. In T. L. Thompson, R. Parrott, & J. F. Nussbaum, The Routledge handbook of health communication. New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Gumaste, P. V., Penn, L. A., Cymerman, R. M., Kirchhoff, T., Polsky, D., & McLellan, B. (2015). Skin cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. British Journal of Dermatology, 172, 1498–1506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallowell, N., Ardern-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Foster, C., Lucassen, A., Moynihan, C., et al. (2005). Communication about genetic testing in families of male BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers: Patterns, priorities and problems. Clinical Genetics, 67(6), 492–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallowell, N., Arden-Jones, A., Eeles, R., Foster, C., Lucassen, A., Moynihan, C., et al. (2006). Guilt, blame and responsibility: Men’s understanding of their role in the transmission of BRCA1/2 mutations within their family. Sociology of Health & Illness, 28(7), 969–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, S. (2016). Gender differences in psychosocial and medical outcomes stemming from testing positive for the BRCA1/2 genetic mutation for breast cancer: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12, 280–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816655257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, S., & An, C. (2015). Within-gender differences in medical decision making among male carriers of the BRCA genetic mutation for hereditary breast cancer. American Journal of Men's Health, 11, 1444–1459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988315610806.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, T. P., & Brashers, D. E. (2009). The theory of communication and uncertainty management: Implications from the wider realm of information behavior. In T. D. Afifi & W. A. Afifi (Eds.), Uncertainty, information management, and disclosure decisions: Theories and applications, (pp. 45–66). New York: Routledge.

  • Honda, K. (2000). Who gets the information about genetic testing for cancer risk? The role of race/ethnicity, immigration status, and primary care clinicians. Clinical Genetics, 64, 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, E. E., Arora, N. K., Rowland, J. H., Bellizzi, K. M., Forsythe, L. P., Hamilton, A. S., et al. (2012). Health information needs and health-related quality of life in a diverse population of long-term cancer survivors. Patient Education and Counseling, 89(2), 345–352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leongamornlert, D., Mahmud, N., Tymrakiewicz, M., Saunders, E., Dadaev, T., Castro, E., et al. (2012). Germline BRCA1 mutations increase prostate cancer risk. British Journal of Cancer, 106, 1697–1701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, S. M. (2014). Cancer risks for men with BRCA1/2 mutations. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41, 99–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mai, P. L., Vadaparampil, S. T., Breen, N., McNeel, T. S., Wideroff, L., & Graubard, B. I. (2014). Awareness of cancer susceptibility genetic testing. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 46, 440–448.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K. E., Daling, J. R., Doody, D. R., Hsu, L., Bernstein, L., Coates, R. J., et al. (2006). Prevalence and predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based study of breast cancer in white and black American women ages 35 to 64 years. Cancer Research, 66, 8297–8308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes, A., Metcalfe, A., Paneque, M., Sousa, L., Clarke, A. J., & Sequeiros, J. (2017). Communication of information about genetic risks: Putting families at the center. Family Process. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2014). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Mersch, J., Jackson, M. A., Park, M., Nebgen, D., Peterson, S. K., Singletary, C., et al. (2015). Cancers associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations other than breast and ovarian. Cancer, 121, 2474–2475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., & Atman, C. J. (2002). Risk communication: A mental models approach. Cambridge University Press.

  • Moynihan, C., Bancroft, E. K., Mitra, A., Arden-Jones, A., Castro, E., Page, E. C., et al. (2017). Ambiguity in a masculine world: Being a BRCA1/2 mutation carrier and a man with prostate cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 26, 1987–1993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2017). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian [v.2.2017]. Retrieved from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp.

  • Rauscher, E. A., & Dean, M. (2017). “I’ve just never gotten around to doing it”: Men’s approaches to managing BRCA-related cancer risks. Patient Education and Counseling, 101, 340–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skop, M., Lorentz, J., Jassi, M., Vesprini, D., & Einstein, G. (2018). “Guys don’t have breasts”: The lived experience of men who have BRCA gene mutations and are at risk for male breast cancer. American Journal of Men’s Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988317753241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Strømsvik, N., Råheim, M., Øyen, N., Engebretsen, L. F., & Gjengedal, E. (2010). Stigmatization and male identity: Norwegian males’ experience after identification as BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19, 360–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strømsvik, N., Råheim, M., Øyen, N., & Gjengedal, E. (2009). Men in the women’s world of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer—A systematic review. Familial Cancer, 8(3), 221–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suttman, A., Pilarski, R., Agnese, D. M., & Senter, L. (2018). “Second-class status?”: Insight into communication patterns and common concerns among men with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Journal of Genetic Counseling. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0214-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, S.J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Download references

Funding

This study was funded through a Seed Grant from the College of Liberal Arts at Texas A&M University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Emily Rauscher and Marleah Dean were responsible for the conception and design of the work and collection of interview data. Emily Rauscher, Marleah Dean, and Gemme Campbell were involved in analysis of interview data and drafting and revising the manuscript. Emily Rauscher has final approval of the version to be published. Emily Rauscher and Marleah Dean are accountable for all aspects of the accuracy and integrity of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily A. Rauscher.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Emily Rauscher, Marleah Dean, and Gemme Campbell declare they have no conflict of interest.

Human Studies and Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Animal Studies

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rauscher, E.A., Dean, M. & Campbell-Salome, G.M. “I Am Uncertain About What My Uncertainty Even Is”: Men’s Uncertainty and Information Management of Their BRCA-Related Cancer Risks. J Genet Counsel 27, 1417–1427 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0276-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0276-y

Keywords

Navigation