Movement of Genetic Counselors from Clinical to Non-clinical Positions: Identifying Driving Forces

Abstract

A previous study of genetic counselors (GCs) in the state of Indiana identified movement out of clinical positions within the past 2 years. The aims of this study were to determine if this trend is nationwide and identify reasons why GCs are leaving their positions and factors that might help employers attract and retain GCs. An email was sent to members of the American Board of Genetic Counseling with a link to an online confidential survey. There were 939 responses (23.5% response rate). Overall, 52% of GCs report being highly satisfied in their current position, although almost two thirds think about leaving and one third had changed jobs within the past 2 years. Of those who had changed jobs (n = 295), 74.9% had been working in a hospital/clinic setting but only 46.3% currently do, demonstrating a major shift out of the clinic (p < 0.001). The top three reasons cited for leaving a position were work environment/institutional climate, salary/benefits, and a lack of feeling valued/recognized as a professional. These results confirm that GCs are moving out of clinical positions and document elements of job satisfaction. We suggest points for employers to consider when trying to recruit or retain GCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. ACGC. (2013). Standards of accreditation for graduate programs in genetic counseling. In Specific requirements for core cases. Accredited Programs. (2018, January 21). Retrieved from http://gceducation.org/Pages/Accredited-Programs.aspx.

  2. Allen, D. G. (2008). Retaining talent: a guide to analyzing and manageing employee turnover. Retrieved from https://www.shrm.org/about/foundation/research/Documents/Retaining%20Talent-%20Final.pdf.

  3. Baars, M. J., Henneman, L., & Ten Kate, L. P. (2005). Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem. Genetics in Medicine, 7(9), 605–610.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonadies, D. C., Brierley, K. L., Barnett, R. E., Baxter, M. D., Donenberg, T., Ducaine, W. L., Ernstx, M. E., Homer, J., Judkins, M., Lovick, N. M., Powers, J. M., Stanislaw, C., Stark, E., Stenner, R. C., & Matloff, E. T. (2014). Adverse events in cancer genetic testing: the third case series. The Cancer Journal, 20(4), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0000000000000057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bothma, C., & Roodt, G. (2013). The validation of the turnover intention scale. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v11i1.507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bureau of Labor Statitstics, US Department of Labor. (2015). Occupational Outlook Handbook, Genetic Counselors, on the Internet at https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/genetic-counselors.htm (visited November 15, 2016).

  7. Cohen, S. A., Tucker, M. E., & Delk, P. (2016). Genetic counselor workforce issues: a survey of genetic counselors licensed in the State of Indiana. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-0026-y.

  8. Cragun, D., Camperlengo, L., Robinson, E., Caldwell, M., Kim, J., Phelan, C., Monteiro, A. N., Vadaparampil, S. T., Sellers, T. A., & Pal, T. (2014). Differences in BRCA counseling and testing practices based on ordering provider type. Genetics in Medicine, 17, 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dawson, A. J., Stasa, H., Roche, M. A., Homer, C. S., & Duffield, C. (2014). Nursing churn and turnover in Australian hospitals: nurses perceptions and suggestions for supportive strategies. BMC Nursing, 13(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6955-13-11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dickerson, J. A., Cole, B., Conta, J. H., Wellner, M., Wallace, S. E., Jack, R. M., Rutledge, J., & Astion, M. L. (2014). Improving the value of costly genetic reference laboratory testing with active utilization management. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 138(1), 110–113. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2012-0726-OA.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Douma, K. L., Smets, E. A., & Allain, D. (2015). Non-genetic health professionals’ attitude towards, knowledge of and skills in discussing and ordering genetic testing for hereditary cancer. Familial Cancer, 15, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-015-9852-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoskovec, J. M., Bennett, R. L., Carey, M. E., DaVanzo, J. E., Dougherty, M., Hahn, S. E., LeRoy, B. S., O’Neal, S., Richardson, J. G., & Wicklund, C. A. (2017). Projecting the supply and demand for certified genetic counselors: a workforce study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 27, 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0158-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kofman, L., Seprish, M. B., & Summar, M. (2016). Climbing the ladder: experience with developing a large group genetic counselor career ladder at Children’s National Health System. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(4), 644–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-9967-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kovner, C. T., Brewer, C. S., Fatehi, F., & Jun, J. (2014). What does nurse turnover rate mean and what is the rate? Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice, 15(3–4), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154414547953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marzuillo, C., De Vito, C., Boccia, S., D’Addario, M., D’Andrea, E., Santini, P., et al. (2013). Knowledge, attitudes and behavior of physicians regarding predictive genetic tests for breast and colorectal cancer. Preventive Medicine, 57(5), 477–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.06.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Medina, E. (2012). Job satisfaction and employee turnover intention: what does organizational culture have to do with it?, Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.7916/D8DV1S08.

  17. Miller, C. E., Krautscheid, P., Baldwin, E. E., Tvrdik, T., Openshaw, A. S., Hart, K., & LaGrave, D. (2014). Genetic counselor review of genetic test orders in a reference laboratory reduces unnecessary testing. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 164(5), 1094–1101. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. NSGC. (2016). 2016 professional status survey: executive summary. Retrieved from nsgc.org

  19. NSGC Strategic Plan. (2018). National Society of Genetic Counselors. Retrieved from https://www.nsgc.org/page/about-nsgc

  20. O'Brien-Pallas, L., Griffin, P., Shamian, J., Buchan, J., Duffield, C., Hughes, F., et al. (2006). The impact of nurse turnover on patient, nurse, and system outcomes: a pilot study and focus for a multicenter international study. Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice, 7(3), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527154406291936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Osuji, J., Uzoka, F. M., Aladi, F., & El-Hussein, M. (2014). Understanding the factors that determine registered nurses’ turnover intentions. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 28(2), 140–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pan, V., Yashar, B. M., Pothast, R., & Wicklund, C. (2016). Expanding the genetic counseling workforce: program directors' views on increasing the size of genetic counseling graduate programs. Genetics in Medicine, 18, 842–849. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.179.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pirzadeh-Miller, S., Robinson, L. S., Read, P., & Ross, T. S. (2016). Genetic counseling assistants: an integral piece of the evolving genetic counseling service delivery model. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 26, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-0039-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Riley, J. D., Procop, G. W., Kottke-Marchant, K., Wyllie, R., & Lacbawan, F. L. (2015). Improving molecular genetic test utilization through order restriction, test review, and guidance. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 17(3), 225–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.01.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Roche, M. I., & Greb, A. E. (2016). It's time to ramp up genetic counseling training. Genetics in Medicine, 18, 768–769. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Salm, M., Abbate, K., Appelbaum, P., Ottman, R., Chung, W., Marder, K., Leu, C. S., Alcalay, R., Goldman, J., Curtis, A. M., Leech, C., Taber, K. J., & Klitzman, R. (2014). Use of genetic tests among neurologists and psychiatrists: Knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and needs for training. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(2), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9624-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Seidel, A. (2016). You’ve got to stop losing your millennial staff. Here’s how to do it. The Daily Briefing. Retrieved from https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2016/06/20/millennial-turnover

  28. Sperber, N. R., Carpenter, J. S., Cavallari, L. H., J Damschroder, L., Cooper-DeHoff, R. M., Denny, J. C., et al. (2017). Challenges and strategies for implementing genomic services in diverse settings: experiences from the Implementing GeNomics In pracTicE (IGNITE) network. BMC Medical Genomics, 10(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-017-0273-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Szeremeta, L., & Shamash, N. (2016). Improving staff retention and career progression. Nursing Times, 112(18), 18–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vadaparampil, S. T., Scherr, C. L., Cragun, D., Malo, T. L., & Pal, T. (2014). Pre-test genetic counseling services for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer delivered by non-genetics professionals in the state of Florida. Clinical Genetics, 87, 473–477. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Waltman, L., Runke, C., Balcom, J., Riley, J. D., Lilley, M., Christian, S., Zetzsche, L., & Goodenberger, M. L. (2016). Further defining the role of the laboratory genetic counselor. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(4), 786–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-015-9927-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie A. Cohen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Stephanie Cohen and Megan Tucker declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human Studies and Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Necessity of written informed consent was waived per IRB review.

Animal Studies

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 135 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cohen, S.A., Tucker, M.E. Movement of Genetic Counselors from Clinical to Non-clinical Positions: Identifying Driving Forces. J Genet Counsel 27, 792–799 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-018-0242-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Genetic counselors
  • Job satisfaction
  • Workforce
  • Genetic counseling