A Rapid Systematic Review of Outcomes Studies in Genetic Counseling
- 812 Downloads
As healthcare reimbursement is increasingly tied to value-of-service, it is critical for the genetic counselor (GC) profession to demonstrate the value added by GCs through outcomes research. We conducted a rapid systematic literature review to identify outcomes of genetic counseling. Web of Science (including PubMed) and CINAHL databases were systematically searched to identify articles meeting the following criteria: 1) measures were assessed before and after genetic counseling (pre-post design) or comparisons were made between a GC group vs. a non-GC group (comparative cohort design); 2) genetic counseling outcomes could be assessed independently of genetic testing outcomes, and 3) genetic counseling was conducted by masters-level genetic counselors, or non-physician providers. Twenty-three papers met the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies were in the cancer genetic setting and the most commonly measured outcomes included knowledge, anxiety or distress, satisfaction, perceived risk, genetic testing (intentions or receipt), health behaviors, and decisional conflict. Results suggest that genetic counseling can lead to increased knowledge, perceived personal control, positive health behaviors, and improved risk perception accuracy as well as decreases in anxiety, cancer-related worry, and decisional conflict. However, further studies are needed to evaluate a wider array of outcomes in more diverse genetic counseling settings.
KeywordsGenetic counseling Outcomes Review
Support for Deborah Cragun’s time was provided by a NCI R25T training grant awarded to Moffitt Cancer Center (5R25CA147832-04). The authors thank Eliza Jeong for assistance with formatting.
This manuscript was unfunded work completed as part of the National Society of Genetic Counselors Outcomes work group. We would like to thank NSGC leadership for helping to formulate the working group’s study inclusion criteria for this review and for providing comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
Lisa Madlensky, Angela M. Trepanier, Deborah Cragun, Barbara Lerner, Kristen M. Shannon and Heather Zierhut declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human Studies and Informed Consent
No human studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
- Cheuvront, B., Sorenson, J. R., Callanan, N. P., Stearns, S. C., & DeVellis, B. M. (1998). Psychosocial and educational outcomes associated with home- and clinic-based pretest education and cystic fibrosis carrier testing among a population of at-risk relatives. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 75(5), 461–468.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Green, M. J., Peterson, S. K., Baker, M. W., Harper, G. R., Friedman, L. C., Rubinstein, W. S., et al. (2004). Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility—a randomized controlled trial. Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(4), 442–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Halbert, C. H., Kessler, L., Collier, A., Weathers, B., Stopfer, J., Domchek, S., et al. (2012). Low rates of African American participation in genetic counseling and testing for BRCA1/2 mutations: racial disparities or just a difference? Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21(5), 676–683.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hippman, C., Ringrose, A., Inglis, A., Cheek, J., Albert, A. Y., Remick, R., & Honer, W. G. (2016). Austin JC A pilot randomized clinical trial evaluating the impact of genetic counseling for serious mental illnesses. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 77(2), e190–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Holmes-Rovner, M., Kroll, J., Schmitt, N., Rovner, D.R., Breer, M. L., Rothert, M. L., Padonu, G., Talarczyk, G. (1996). Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale. Medical Decision Making, 16(1), 58–64.Google Scholar
- Kinney, A. Y., Boonyasiriwat, W., Walters, S. T., Pappas, L. M., Stroup, A. M., Schwartz, M. D., Edwards, S. L., Rogers, A., Kohlmann, W. K., Boucher, K. M., Vernon, S. W., Simmons, R. G., Lowery, J. T., Flores, K., Wiggins, C. L., Hill, D. A., Burt, R. W., Williams, M. S., & Higginbotham, J. C. (2014). Telehealth personalized cancer risk communication to motivate colonoscopy in relatives of patients with colorectal cancer: the family CARE Randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(7), 654–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Lerman, C., Schwartz, MD., Miller, SM., Daly, M., Sands, C., Rimer, BK. (1996). A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: Interacting effects of counseling, educational level, and coping style. Health Psychology, 15(2), 75–83.Google Scholar
- MacDonald, D. J., Sarna, L., van Servellen, G., Bastani, R., Giger, J. N., & Weitzel, J. N. (2007). Selection of family members for communication of cancer risk and barriers to this communication before and after genetic cancer risk assessment. Genetics in Medicine, 9(5), 275–282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McInerney-Leo, A., Biesecker, B. B., Hadley, D. W., Kase, R. G., Giambarresi, T. R., Johnson, E., Lerman, C., & Struewing, J. P. (2004). BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: effectiveness of problem-solving training as a counseling intervention. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 130A, 221–227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- McInerney-Leo, A., Hadley, D., Kase, R. G., Giambarresi, T. R., Struewing, J. P., & Biesecker, B. B. (2006). BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families III: risk perception and screening. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 140(20), 2198–206.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Society of Genetic Counselors 2014 Professional Status Survey. (2014).Google Scholar
- National Society of Genetic Counselors Code of Ethics. (2006). Retrieved Aug. 8, 2015, from http://nsgc.org/p/cm/ld/fid=12
- Palmer, C. G., Boudreault, P., Baldwin, E. E., Sinsheimer, J. S. (2014). Impact of genetic counseling and Connexin-26 and Connexin-30 testing on deaf identity and comprehension of genetic test results in a sample of deaf adults: a prospective, longitudinal study. PLoS One, 9(11), e111512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111512.
- Pieterse, A. H., Ausems, M. G. E. M., Spreeuwenberg, P., & van Dulmen, S. (2011). Longer-term influence of breast cancer genetic counseling on cognitions and distress: smaller benefits for affected versus unaffected women. Patient Education and Counseling, 85(3), 425–431.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Practice Based Competencies for Genetic Counselors. (2013). Retrieved 8-8-2015, from http://gceducation.org/Documents/ACGC%20Practice%20Based%20Competencies_13-Final-Web.pdf
- Silvey, K., Stock, J., Hasegawa, L. E., & Au, S. M. (2009). Outcomes of genetics services: creating an inclusive definition and outcomes menu for public health and clinical genetics services. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 151C(3), 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Working Group of the American College of Medical Genetics: competencies for the physician medical geneticist in the 21st century. (2011).Google Scholar