Erratum to: J Genet Counsel

DOI 10.1007/s10897-014-9730-7

After the acceptance and publication of the above paper, the authors identified an error had been made in the calculation of the original PSDS scores. One of the 18 items on the PSDS was accidently duplicated and one item was missing in the original survey. Once this error was recognized, the PSDS scores were recalculated based on the 17 unique questions and analyses were redone. To determine the impact of the duplicated question, we created a scaled PSDS score (PSDS*18/17). The resulting scaled mean PSDS score (96.8, Range=63-119, SD=10.45) was nearly identical to the mean PSDS score reported. Importantly, there were no changes in the relationships between PSDS score, training, supervisory experience, and clinical experience. Since all items on the PSDS are similarly weighted, there is no reason to believe the missing item would bias the results in any way. Therefore, despite the missing item, the study conclusions are unchanged.