Abstract
Few studies have linked actual genetic counseling content to short-term outcomes. Using the Self-regulation Model, the impact of cognitive and affective content in genetic counseling on short-term outcomes was studied in individuals at elevated risk of familial breast-ovarian cancer. Surveys assessed dependent variables: distress, perceived risk, and 6 knowledge measures (Meaning of Positive Test; Meaning of Negative Test; Personal Behavior; Practitioner Knowledge; Mechanisms of Cancer Inheritance; Frequency of Inherited Cancer) measured at pre- and post-counseling. Proportion of participant cognitive and affective and counselor cognitive and affective content during sessions (using LIWC software) were predictors in regressions. Knowledge increased for 5 measures and decreased for Personal Behavior, Distress and Perceived Risk. Controlling for age and education, results were significant/marginally significant for three measures. More counselor content was associated with decreases in knowledge of Personal Behavior. More participant and less counselor affective content was associated with gains in Practitioner Knowledge. More counselor cognitive, and interaction of counselor cognitive and affective content, were associated with higher perceived risk. Genetic counselors dominate the content of counseling sessions. Therefore, their content is tied more closely to short term outcomes than participant content. A lack of patient communication in sessions may pose problems for understanding of complex concepts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrykowski, M. A., Lightner, R., Studts, J. L., & Munn, R. K. (1997). Hereditary cancer risk notification and testing: How interested is the general population? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 15(5), 2139–2148.
Baty, B. J., Venne, V. L., McDonald, J., Croyle, R. T., Halls, C., Nash, J. E., et al. (1997). BRCA1 testing: genetic counseling protocol development and counseling issues. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6(2), 223–244.
Berliner, J. L., & Fay, A. M. (2007). Risk assessment and genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(3), 241–260.
Berliner, J. L., Fay, A. M., Cummings, S. A., Burnett, B., & Tillmanns, T. (2013). NSGC practice guideline: risk assessment of genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22, 155–163.
Biesecker, B. B., & Peters, K. F. (2001). Process studies in genetic counseling: peering into the black box. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 106(3), 191–198.
Bish, A., Sutton, S., Jacobs, C., Levene, S., Ramirez, A., & Hodgson, S. (2002). Changes in psychological distress after cancer genetic counselling: a comparison of affected and unaffected women. British Journal of Cancer, 86(1), 43–50.
Bowen, D. J., Burke, W., McTiernan, A., Yasui, Y., & Andersen, M. R. (2004). Breast cancer risk counseling improves women’s functioning. Patient Education and Counseling, 53(1), 79–86.
Brain, K., Norman, P., Gray, J., Rogers, C., Mansel, R., & Harper, P. (2002). A randomized trial of specialist genetic assessment: psychological impact on women at different levels of familial breast cancer risk. British Journal of Cancer, 86(2), 233–238.
Butow, P. N., & Lobb, E. A. (2004). Analyzing the process and content of genetic counseling in familial breast cancer consultations. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13(5), 403–424.
Butow, P. N., Lobb, E. A., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., & Tucker, K. M. (2003). Psychological outcomes and risk perception after genetic testing and counselling in breast cancer: a systematic review. The Medical Journal of Australia, 178(2), 77–81.
Cameron, L., & Leventhal, H. (2003). Self-regulation, health, and illness: An overview. In H. L. Linda Cameron (Ed.), The self-regulations of health and illness behavior. New York: Routledge.
Cohen, S. (1988). Psychosocial models of the role of social support in the etiology of physical disease. Health Psychology, 7(3), 269–297.
Collins, F. S., Green, E. D., Guttmacher, A. E., & Guyer, M. S. (2003). A vision for the future of genomics research. A blueprint for the genomic era. Nature, 422, 835–847.
Cull, A., Anderson, E. D. C., Campbell, S., Mackay, J., Smyth, E., & Steel, M. (1999). The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women’s risk perceptions and levels of distress. British Journal of Cancer, 79(3/4), 501–508.
Culver, J., Burke, W., Yasui, Y., Durfy, S., & Press, N. (2001). Participation in breast cancer genetic counseling: the influence of educational level, ethnic background, and risk perception. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10(3), 215–231.
DiGianni, L. M., Kim, H. T., Emmons, K., Gelman, R., Kalkbrenner, K. J., & Garber, J. E. (2003). Complementary medicine use among women enrolled in a genetic testing program. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 12(4), 321–326.
Dijkstra, H., Albada, A., Klöckner Cronauer, C., Ausems, M. G., & van Dulmen, S. (2013). Nonverbal communication and conversational contribution in breast cancer genetic counseling: Are counselors’ nonverbal communication and conversational contribution associated with counselees’ satisfaction, needs fulfillment and state anxiety in breast cancer genetic counseling? Patient Education and Counseling, 93, 216–223.
Duric, V., Butow, P., Sharpe, L., Lobb, E., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., et al. (2003). Reducing psychological distress in a genetic counseling consultation for Breast Cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12(3), 243–264.
Ellington, L., Roter, D., Dudley, W. N., Baty, B. J., Upchurch, R., Larson, S., et al. (2005). Communication analysis of BRCA1 genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14(5), 377–386.
Ellington, L., Baty, B. J., McDonald, J., Venne, V., Musters, A., Roter, D., et al. (2006). Exploring genetic counseling communication patterns: the role of teaching and counseling approaches. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(3), 179–189.
Ellington, L., Kelly, K. M., Reblin, M., Latimer, S., & Roter, D. (2011). Communication in genetic counseling: cognitive and emotional processing. Health Communication, 26(7), 667–675.
Graves, K. D., Schmidt, J., Bollmer, J., Fejfar, M., Langer, S., Blonder, L. X., et al. (2005a). Emotional expression and emotional recognition in breast cancer survivors: a controlled comparison. Psychology & Health, 20(5), 579–595.
Graves, K. D., Schmidt, J. E., & Andrykowski, M. A. (2005b). Writing about September 11, 2001: the role of emotional intelligence and the social environment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–299.
Green, M. J., Peterson, S. K., Baker, M. W., Harper, G. R., Friedman, L. C., Rubinstein, W. S., et al. (2004). Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(4), 442–452.
Gwyn, K., Vernon, S. W., & Conoley, P. M. (2003). Intention to pursue genetic testing for breast cancer among women due for screening mammography. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 12, 96–102.
Helmes, A. W., Culver, J. O., & Bowen, D. J. (2006). Results of a randomized study of telephone versus in-person breast cancer risk counseling. Patient Education and Counseling, 64(1–3), 96–103.
Hopwood, P. (2005). Psychosocial aspects of risk communication and mutation testing in familial breast-ovarian cancer. Current Opinion in Oncology, 17(4), 340–344.
Kahn, J. H., Tobin, R. M., Massey, A. E., & Anderson, J. A. (2007). Measuring emotional expression with the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC). American Journal of Psychology, 120, 263–286.
Kelly, K., Leventhal, H., Toppmeyer, D., Much, J., Dermody, J., Marvin, M., et al. (2003). Subjective and objective risk of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12(4), 351–371.
Kelly, K., Leventhal, H., Marvin, M., Toppmeyer, D., Much, J., Dermody, J., et al. (2004a). Subjective and objective risk of breast cancer in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals at risk for BRCA1/2 mutations. Genetic Testing, 8(2), 139–147.
Kelly, K., Leventhal, H., Andrykowski, M., Toppmeyer, D., Much, J., Dermody, J., et al. (2004b). The decision to test in women receiving genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13(3), 237–257.
Kelly, K., Leventhal, H., Marvin, M., Toppmeyer, D., Baran, J., & Schwalb, M. (2004c). Cancer genetics knowledge and beliefs and receipt of results in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals receiving counseling for BRCA1/2 mutations. Cancer Control, 11(4), 236–244.
Kelly, K., Leventhal, H., Andrykowski, M., Toppmeyer, D., Much, J., Dermody, J., et al. (2005). Using the common sense model to understand perceived cancer risk in individuals testing for BRCA1/2 mutations. Psycho-Oncology, 14(1), 34–48.
Kelly, K., Andrews, J. E., Case, D. O., Allard, S. L., & Johnson, J. D. (2007). Information seeking and intentions to have genetic testing for hereditary cancers in rural and Appalachian Kentuckians. The Journal of Rural Health, 23(2), 166–172.
Kinney, A. Y., Croyle, R. T., Dudley, W. N., Bailey, C. A., Pelias, M. K., & Neuhausen, S. L. (2001). Knowledge, attitudes, and interest in breast-ovarian cancer gene testing: a survey of a large African-American kindred with a BRCA1 mutation. Preventive Medicine, 33(6), 543–551.
Lebo, M., & Nesselroade, J. (1978). Intraindividual differences dimensions of mood change during pregnancy identified in five P-technique factor analyses. Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 205–224.
Lee, S. C., Bernhardt, B. A., & Helzlsouer, K. J. (2002). Utilization of BRCA1/2 genetic testing in the clinical setting: report from a single institution. Cancer, 94(6), 1876–1885.
Lerman, C., Daly, M., Masny, A., & Balshem, A. (1994). Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 12(4), 843–850.
Lerman, C., Schwartz, M., Miller, S., Daly, M., Sands, C., & Rimer, B. (1996). A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: Interacting effects of counseling, education level, and coping style. Health Psychology, 15(2), 75–83.
Lerman, C., Biesecker, B., Benkendorf, J. L., Kerner, J., Gomez-Caminero, A., Hughes, C., et al. (1997a). Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 89(2), 148–157.
Lerman, C., Schwartz, M. D., Lin, T. H., Hughes, C., Narod, S., & Lynch, H. T. (1997b). The influence of psychological distress on use of genetic testing for cancer risk. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(3), 414–420.
Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 119–186.
Leventhal, H., Singer, R., & Jones, S. (1965). Effects of fear and specificity of recommendations upon attitudes and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 20–29.
Leventhal, H., Brisette, I., & Leventhal, E. (2003). The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness. In L. D. Cameron & H. Leventhal (Eds.), The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour (pp. 42–65). London: Routledge.
Lobb, E. A., Butow, P., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., Kirk, J., Gattas, M., et al. (2002a). The use of audiotapes in consultations with women from high risk breast cancer families: a randomised trial. Journal of Medical Genetics, 39(9), 697–703.
Lobb, E. A., Butow, P. N., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., Gaff, C., Young, M. A., et al. (2002b). Tailoring communication in consultations with women from high risk breast cancer families. British Journal of Cancer, 87(5), 502–508.
Lobb, E. A., Butow, P. N., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., Gaff, C., Young, M. A., et al. (2003). Women’s preferences and consultants’ communication of risk in consultations about familial breast cancer: impact on patient outcomes. Journal of Medical Genetics, 40(5), e56.
Lobb, E. A., Butow, P. N., Barratt, A., Meiser, B., Gaff, C., Young, M. A., et al. (2004). Communication and information-giving in high-risk breast cancer consultations: influence on patient outcomes. British Journal of Cancer, 90(2), 321–327.
Matloff, E. T., Moyer, A., Shannon, K. M., Niendorf, K. B., & Col, N. F. (2006). Healthy women with a family history of breast cancer: impact of a tailored genetic counseling intervention on risk perception, knowledge, and menopausal therapy decision making. Journal of Women’s Health, 15(7), 843–856.
McNair, D., Lorr, M., & Droppleman, L. (1971). Profile of mood states. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
Mehl, M. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2003). The sounds of social life: a psychometric analysis of students’ daily social environments and natural conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 857–870.
Meiser, B., & Halliday, J. L. (2002). What is the impact of genetic counselling in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer? A meta-analytic review. Social Science & Medicine, 54, 1463–1470.
Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2), 120–123.
Moslehi, R., Chu, W., Karlan, B., Fishman, D., Risch, H., Fields, A., et al. (2000). BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation analysis of 208 Ashkenazi Jewish women with ovarian cancer. American Journal of Human Genetics, 66(4), 1259–1272.
Neuhausen, S., Gilewski, T., Norton, L., Tran, T., McGuire, P., Swensen, J., et al. (1996). Recurrent BRCA2 6174delT mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish women affected by breast cancer. Nature Genetics, 13(1), 126–128.
Niederhoffer, K. G., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2002). Linguistic style matching in social interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(4), 337–360.
NSGC. (2004). Familial cancer risk counseling association: standard protocol. Retrieved 12/5/2008, from https://doi.org/www.nsgc.org
Pekrun, R. (1992). The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology, 41(4), 359–376.
Pennebaker, J., & Francis, M. E. (1996). Cognitive, emotional, and language processes in disclosure. Cognitive & Emotion, 10(6), 601–626.
Pennebaker, J., & Francis, M. E. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count, the second version: SLIWC. Austin: University of Texas.
Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. LIWC2007 Manual.
Pieterse, A. H., van Dulmen, A. M., Ausems, M. G., Beemer, F. A., & Bensing, J. M. (2005). Communication in cancer genetic counselling: does it reflect counselees’ previsit needs and preferences? British Journal of Cancer, 92(9), 1671–1678.
Pieterse, A. H., van Dulmen, A. M., Beemer, F. A., Bensing, J. M., & Ausems, M. G. (2007). Cancer genetic counseling: communication and counselees’ post-visit satisfaction, cognitions, anxiety, and needs fulfillment. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(1), 85–96.
Randall, J., Butow, P., Kirk, J., & Tucker, K. (2001). Psychological impact of genetic counselling and testing in women previously diagnosed with breast cancer. Internal Medicine Journal, 31(7), 397–405.
Rees, G., Young, M. A., Gaff, C., & Martin, P. R. (2006). A qualitative study of health professionals’ views regarding provision of information about health-protective behaviors during genetic consultation for breast cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(2), 95–104.
Resta, R., Biesecker, B. B., Bennett, R. L., Blum, S., Hahn, S. E., Strecker, M. N., et al. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(2), 77–83.
Rimes, K. A., Salkovskis, P. M., Jones, L., & Lucassen, A. M. (2006). Applying a cognitive behavioral model of health anxiety in a cancer genetics service. Health Psychology, 25(2), 171–180.
Shiloh, S. (2006). Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: a theoretical review. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(5), 325–337.
Struewing, J. P., Hartge, P., Wacholder, S., Baker, S. M., Berlin, M., McAdams, M., et al. (1997). The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. The New England Journal of Medicine, 336(20), 1401–1408.
Tonin, P., Weber, B., Offit, K., Couch, F., Rebbeck, T. R., Neuhausen, S., et al. (1996). Frequency of recurrent BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish breast cancer families. Nature Medicine, 2(11), 1179–1183.
van Dijk, S., Otten, W., Zoeteweij, M. W., Timmermans, D. R., van Asperen, C. J., Breuning, M. H., et al. (2003). Genetic counselling and the intention to undergo prophylactic mastectomy: effects of a breast cancer risk assessment. British Journal of Cancer, 88(11), 1675–1681.
Wang, C., Gonzalez, R., Milliron, K. J., Strecher, V. J., & Merajver, S. D. (2005). Genetic counseling for BRCA1/2: a randomized controlled trial of two strategies to facilitate the education and counseling process. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 134(1), 66–73.
Watson, E. K., Shickle, D., Qureshi, N., Emery, J., & Austoker, J. (1999). The ‘new genetics’ and primary care: GPs’ views on their role and their educational needs. Family Practice, 16(4), 420–425.
Wiebe, D. J., & Korbel, C. (2003). Defensive denial, affect, and the self-regulation of health threats. In L. D. Cameron & H. Leventhal (Eds.), The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour (pp. 184–203). London: Routledge.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (R03 CA128459-01A2 Kelly, PI).
Conflict of Interest
“The authors have no conflict of interest with the content of this manuscript.”
Informed Consent
“All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.”
“I confirm all patient/personal identifiers have been removed or disguised so the patient/person(s) described are not identifiable and cannot be identified through the details of the story.”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kelly, K.M., Ellington, L., Schoenberg, N. et al. Linking Genetic Counseling Content to Short-Term Outcomes in Individuals at Elevated Breast Cancer Risk. J Genet Counsel 23, 838–848 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9705-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9705-8