Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic Counseling and the Ethical Issues Around Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing

  • Professional Issues
  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

Over the last several years, direct to consumer (DTC) genetic testing has received increasing attention in the public, healthcare and academic realms. DTC genetic testing companies face considerable criticism and scepticism, particularly from the medical and genetic counseling community. This raises the question of what specific aspects of DTC genetic testing provoke concerns, and conversely, promises, for genetic counselors. This paper addresses this question by exploring DTC genetic testing through an ethical lens. By considering the fundamental ethical approaches influencing genetic counseling (the ethic of care and principle-based ethics) we highlight the specific ethical concerns raised by DTC genetic testing companies. Ultimately, when considering the ethics of DTC testing in a genetic counseling context, we should think of it as a balancing act. We need careful and detailed consideration of the risks and troubling aspects of such testing, as well as the potentially beneficial direct and indirect impacts of the increased availability of DTC genetic testing. As a result it is essential that genetic counselors stay informed and involved in the ongoing debate about DTC genetic testing and DTC companies. Doing so will ensure that the ethical theories and principles fundamental to the profession of genetic counseling are promoted not just in traditional counseling sessions, but also on a broader level. Ultimately this will help ensure that the public enjoys the benefits of an increasingly genetic-based healthcare system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACMG (2004). ACMG statement on direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Genetics in Medicine, 6(1), 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, M. (2009). We are the genes we’ve been waiting for: rational responses to the gathering storm of personal genomics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 9(6), 30–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, K., Micco, E., Carney, A., Stopfer, J., & Putt, M. (2005). Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 293(14), 1729–1736.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloss, C., Ornowski, L., Silver, E., Cargill, M., Vanier, V., Schork, N., et al. (2010). Consumer perceptions of direct to consumer personalized genomic risk assessments. Genetics in Medicine, 12(9), 556–566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloss, C., Schork, N., & Topol, E. (2011). Effect of direct to consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk. The New England Journal of Medicine, 364(6), 524–534.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bloss, C. S., Topol, E. J., & Schork, N. J. (2011). Association of direct-to-consumer genome-wide disease risk estimates and self-reported disease. Genetic Epidemiology. doi:10.1002/gepi.20664.

  • Brice, P. (2010). Current DTC genetic testing market smaller than expected. http://www.phgfoundation.org/news/5658/. Accessed May 30 2011.

  • Burke, W., & Psaty, B. (2007). Personalized medicine in the era of genomics. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 298(14), 1682–1684.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, S., Martyn, M., Stone, A., Bennett, C., Thomas, H., & Farndon, P. (2009). Developing a curriculum statement based on clinical practice: genetics in primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 59(559), 99–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caulfield, T. (2009). Direct to consumer genetics and health policy: a worst-case scenario? The American Journal of Bioethics, 9(6 & 7), 48–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. (2001). Justice, health, and healthcare. American Journal of Bioethics, 1(2), 2–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geransar, R., & Einsiedel, E. (2008). Evaluating online direct to consumer marketing of genetic tests: informed choices or buyers beware? Genetic testing, 12(1), 13–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gillon, R. (1986). Philosophical Medical Ethics. Wiley and Son.

  • Giovanni, M. A., Fickie, M. R., Lehmann, L. S., Green, R. C., Meckley, L. M., Veenstra, D., et al. (2010). Health-care referrals from direct to consumer genetic testing. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers, 14(6), 817–819.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gollust, S. E., Hull, S. C., & Wilfond, B. S. (2002). Limitations of direct to consumer advertising for clinical genetic testing. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(14), 1762–1767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. C., Roberts, J. S., Cupples, L. A., Relkin, N. R., Whitehouse, P. J., Brown, T., et al. (2009). Disclosure of APOE genotype for risk of Alzheimer’s disease. The New England Journal of Medicine, 361(3), 245–254.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guttmacher, A. E., Porteous, M. E., & McInerney, J. D. (2007). Educating health-care professionals about genetics and genomics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 8(2), 151–157.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M., & Olopade, O. I. (2005). Confronting genetic testing disparities. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 293(14), 1783–1785.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Headings, V. (1997). Revisiting foundations of autonomy and beneficence in genetic counseling. Genetic Counseling, 8(4), 291–294.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heshka, J. T., Palleschi, C., Howley, H., Wilson, B., & Wells, P. S. (2008). A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing. Genetics in Medicine, 10(1), 19–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hock, K. T., Christensen, K. D., Yashar, B. M., Roberts, J. S., Gollust, S. E., & Uhlmann, W. R. (2011). Direct to consumer genetic testing: an assessment of genetic counselors’ knowledge and beliefs. Genetics in Medicine, 13(4), 325–332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, H., & Borry, P. (2009). Personal genome testing: do you know what you are buying? The American Journal of Bioethics, 9(6), 11–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, A., Mountain, J., Wojcicki, A., & Avey, L. (2009). A pragmatic consideration of ethical issues relating to personal genomics. The American Journal of Bioethics, 9(6), 1–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, K., Javitt, G., Burke, W., & Byers, P. (2007). ASHG statement on direct to consumer genetic testing in the United States. American Journal of Human Genetics, 81(3), 635–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. G. W., Sharpe, N., Mullen, M., & Meschino, W. S. (2001). Ethical, legal, and practical concerns about recontacting patients to inform them of new information: the case in medical genetics. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 103(4), 265–276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janssens, A. C., Gwinn, M., Bradley, L. A., Oostra, B. A., van Duijn, C. M., & Khoury, M. J. (2008). A critical appraisal of the scientific basis of commercial genomic profiles used to assess health risks and personalize health interventions. American Journal Human Genetics, 82(3), 593–599.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, A. R. (1986). Casuistry and clinical ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 7(1), 65–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordens, C., Kerridge, I., & Samuel, G. (2009). Direct to consumer personal genome testing: the problem is not ignorance - it is market failure. The American Journal of Bioethics, 9(6), 13–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaphingst, K. A., McBride, C. M., Wade, C., Alford, S. H., Brody, L. C., & Baxevanis, A. D. (2010). Consumers’ use of web-based information and their decisions about multiplex genetic susceptibility testing. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 12(3), e41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karns, L., Roche, M., & Yashar, B. (2005). An ethics casebook for genetic counselors, 2nd Edition: Ethical discourse for the practice of genetic counseling. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, G., Milligan, R., & Wilhelmi, B. (2006). Legal pressures and incentives for personalized medicine. Personalized Medicine, 3(4), 391–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, C. M., Alford, S. H., Reid, R. J., Larson, E. B., Baxevanis, A. D., & Brody, L. C. (2009). Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions. Genetics in Medicine, 11(8), 582–587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, A., & Burke, W. (2008). An unwelcome side effect of direct to consumer personal genome testing: raiding the medical commons. Journal of the American Medical Association, 300(22), 2669–2671.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, A., Diaz, C., Hilsenbeck, S., & Wang, T. (2009). Social networkers’ attitudes toward direct to consumer personal genome testing. The American Journal of Bioethics, 9(6), 3–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. (1996). Casuistry and modern ethics: A poetics of practical reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSGC (2006). Code of Ethics. http://www.nsgc.org/Advocacy/NSGCCodeofEthics/tabid/155/Default.aspx. Accessed May 20, 2011.

  • Offit, K. (2008). Genomic profiles for disease risk: predictive or premature? JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 299(11), 1353–1355.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Offit, K., Groeger, E., Turner, S., Wadsworth, E. A., & Weiser, M. A. (2004). The“ duty to warn” a patient’s family members about hereditary disease risks. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(12), 14691473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salkin, A. (2008). When in Doubt, Spit It Out. (Sep 14th). New York Times.

  • Schmerler, S. (1999). Ethical and legal issues. In D. Baker, J. Schuette, & W. Uhlmann (Eds.), A guide to genetic counseling. New York: Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirovich, B., Woloshin, S., & Schwartz, L. (2011). Too little? Too much? Primary care physicians’ views on us health care a brief report. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171(17), 1582–1585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, C. H., & Wilfond, B. S. (2006). Ethical and clinical practice considerations for genetic counselors related to direct to consumer marketing of genetic tests. Journal of Medical Genetics, 142(4), 284–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasson, K., Cook, E., & Helzlsouer, K. (2006). Direct to consumer online genetic testing and the four principles: an analysis of the ethical issues. Ethics and Medicine, 22(2), 83–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, J. (2000). Psychosocial genetic counseling. USA: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, J. (2003). Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era: a point of view. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12(3), 199–211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (2007). Insurance coverage for pharmacogenomic testing in the USA. Personalized Medicine, 4(4), 479–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alice K. Hawkins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hawkins, A.K., Ho, A. Genetic Counseling and the Ethical Issues Around Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing. J Genet Counsel 21, 367–373 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-012-9488-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-012-9488-8

Keywords

Navigation