Skip to main content
Log in

The Effectiveness of Family History Questionnaires in Cancer Genetic Counseling

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

The number of individuals receiving genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome has steadily risen. To triage patients for genetic counseling and to help reduce the amount of time needed by a genetic counselor in direct patient contact, many clinics have implemented the use of family history questionnaires. Although such questionnaires are widely used, scant literature exists evaluating their effectiveness. This article explores the extent to which family history questionnaires are being used in Ontario and addresses the utility of such questionnaires in one familial cancer clinic. By comparing the pedigrees created from questionnaires to those updated during genetic counseling, the accuracy and effectiveness of the questionnaires was explored. Of 121 families recruited into the study, 12% acquired changes to their pedigree that led to a revised probability estimate for having a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation and 5% acquired changes that altered their eligibility for genetic testing. No statistically significant difference existed between the eligibility for genetic testing prior to and post counseling. This suggests that family history questionnaires can be effective at obtaining a family history and accurately assessing eligibility for genetic testing. Based on the variables that were significantly associated with a change in probability estimate, we further present recommendations for improving the clarity of such questionnaires and therefore the ease of use by patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antoniou, A., Pharoah, P. D., Narod, S., et al. (2003). Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. American Journal of Human Genetics, 72, 1117–1130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/375033.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. A., Iversen, E. S,. Jr, Gudbjartsson, D. F., Hiller, E. H., Garber, J. E., Peshkin, B. N., et al. (2002). BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20(11), 2701–2712. doi:https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.05.121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. (1999). Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation carriers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 91(15), 1310–1316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/91.15.1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brener, D., Schulz, C., Schluger, A., & Offit, K. (1996). A self-administered family history questionnaire (FHQ) utilized in an outpatient setting to assess cancer risk. American Journal of Human Genetics, 59, A333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, K. I., Luker, K. A., Leinster, S. J., Ellis, I., & Booth, K. (2001). Information and support needs of women with primary relatives with breast cancer: development of the information and support needs questionnaire. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(4), 497–507. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01866.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FamyGenetix Ltd. (2001). Cyrillic 3. Oxford: UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D., Easton, D. F., Bishop, D. T., et al. (1994). Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Lancet, 343, 692–695. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91578-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hallowell, N., Murton, F., Statham, H., Green, J. M., & Richards, M. P. (1997). Women's need for information before attending genetic counselling for familial breast or ovarian cancer: a questionnaire, interview, and observational study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed), 281, 7076–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. C., Marks, J. H., Mandell, J. B., & New York Breast Cancer Study Group. (2003). Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science, 302, 643–646. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1088759.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marroni, F., Aretini, P., D’Andrea, E., Caligo, M. A., Cortesi, L., Viel, A., et al. (2004). Penetrances of breast and ovarian cancer in a large series of families tested for BRCA1/2 mutations. European Journal of Human Genetics, 12(11), 899–906. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miki, Y., Swensen, J., Shattuck-Eidens, D., Futreal, P. A., Harshman, K., Tavtigian, S., et al. (1994). A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science, 266(5182), 66–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7545954.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NCIC. (2007). Canadian Cancer Statistics 2007. Toronto: Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risch, H. A., McLaughlin, J. R., Cole, D. E., Rosen, B., Bradley, L., Kwan, E., et al. (2001). Prevalence and penetrance of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population series of 649 women with ovarian cancer. American Journal of Human Genetics, 68(3), 700–710. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/318787.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Risch, H. A., McLaughlin, J. R., Cole, D. E., Rosen, B., Bradley, L., Fan, I., et al. (2006). Population BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation frequencies and cancer penetrances: a kin-cohort study in Ontario, Canada. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 98(23), 1694–1706.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Satagopan, J. M., Offit, K., Foulkes, W., Robson, M. E., Wacholder, S., Eng, C. M., et al. (2001). The lifetime risks of breast cancer in Ashkenazi Jewish carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 10(5), 467–473.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorlacius, S., Struewing, J. P., Hartge, P., Olafsdottir, G. H., Sigvaldason, H., Tryggvadottir, L., et al. (1998). Population-based study of risk of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA2 mutation. Lancet, 352(9137), 1337–1339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)03300-5. see comment.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whittemore, A. S., Gong, G., & Itnyre, J. (1997). Prevalence and contribution of BRCA1 mutations in breast cancer and ovarian cancer: results from three U.S. population-based case-control studies of ovarian cancer. American Journal of Human Genetics, 60(3), 496–504.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wooster, R., Bignell, G., Lancaster, J., Swift, S., Seal, S., Mangion, J., et al. (1995). Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature, 378(6559), 789–792. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/378789a0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziogas, A., & Anton-Culver, H. (2003). Validation of family history data in cancer family registries. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(2), 190–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00593-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge Kara Hitchman for her excellent comments and contributions to reviewing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Randall Armel.

Appendices

Appendix I: BRCA1/BRCA2 Genetic Testing Criteria in the Province of Ontario

Testing for affected individuals with breast or ovarian cancer

At least one case of cancer:

  1. 1.

    Ashkenazi Jewish and breast cancer <50 years, or ovarian cancer at any age. Note: testing limited to ethnic specific mutations, unless other criteria given in this list are met.

  2. 2.

    Breast cancer <35 years of age.

  3. 3.

    Male breast cancer.

  4. 4.

    Invasive serous ovarian cancer at any age.

At least two cases of cancer on the same side of the family:

  1. 5.

    Breast cancer <60 years, and a first or second-degree relative with ovarian cancer or male breast cancer.

  2. 6.

    Breast and ovarian cancer in the same individual, or bilateral breast cancer with the first case <50 years.

  3. 7.

    Two cases of breast cancer, both <50 years, in first or second-degree relatives.

  4. 8.

    Two cases of ovarian cancer, any age, in first or second-degree relatives.

  5. 9.

    Ashkenazi Jewish and breast cancer at any age, and any family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Note: testing limited to ethnic specific mutations, unless other criteria given in this list are met.

At least three cases of cancer on the same side of the family:

  1. 10.

    Three or more cases of breast or ovarian cancer at any age.

Testing for unaffected individuals (this should be done only if affected individuals are unavailable e.g. deceased)

  1. 11.

    Relative of individual with known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Note: specific family mutation only tested.

  2. 12.

    Ashkenazi Jewish and first or second-degree relative of individual with: breast cancer <50 years, or ovarian cancer at any age, or male breast cancer, or breast cancer at any age, with positive family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Note: testing limited to ethnic specific mutations, unless other criteria are met.

  3. 13.

    A pedigree strongly suggestive of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer, i.e. risk of carrying a mutation for the individual being tested is >10%.

Appendix II: Revised Family History Questionaire

figure a
figure b
figure c

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Randall Armel, S., McCuaig, J., Finch, A. et al. The Effectiveness of Family History Questionnaires in Cancer Genetic Counseling. J Genet Counsel 18, 366–378 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-009-9228-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-009-9228-x

Keywords

Navigation