The Relationship of Nondirectiveness to Genetic Counseling: Report of a Workshop at the 2003 NSGC Annual Education Conference
Nondirectiveness has been a guiding principle for genetic counseling since the founding of the profession. However, its efficacy and appropriateness in this role have been frequently questioned. A workshop at the 2003 Annual Education Conference of the National Society of Genetic Counselors provided audience participation in a discussion of these issues. Participants presented arguments for and against nondirectiveness as a central ethos. They described complex personal transitions in adapting what they had learned about nondirectiveness during training to the realities of the workplace. There was support for flexible approaches to genetic counseling, with varying adherence to nondirectiveness, based on client and family needs and values, clinical circumstances, and desired counseling outcomes. The discussion supports the use of clinical experience, outcomes research, and the experience of other professions to move beyond nondirectiveness and more accurately identify the theoretical bases that underlie genetic counseling in the variety of circumstances in which it is currently practiced.
KEY WORDS:genetic counseling nondirective counseling.
We thank Elizabeth Alexander and Elizabeth Detwiler for transcribing the authors’ introductory comments and the public discussion of the EBS. We also thank all those who attended and participated in the EBS and who communicated via e-mail.
- Biesecker, B. B. (2000). Reproduction, ethics, the ethics of reproductive genetic counseling: Nondirectiveness. In T. J. Murray & M. J. Mehlman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of ethical, legal, and policy issues in biotechnology (pp. 977–983). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Caplan, A. L. (1993). Neutrality is not morality: The ethics of genetic counseling. In D. M. Bartels, B. S. LeRoy, & A. L. Caplan (Eds.), Prescribing our future: Ethical challenges in genetic counseling (pp. 149–165). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Clarke, A. J. (1997). The process of genetic counseling: Beyond non-directiveness. In P. S. Harper & A. J. Clarke (Eds.), Genetics, society and clinical practice (pp. 179–200). Oxford: BIOS Scientific.Google Scholar
- Djurdjinovic, L. (1998). Psychosocial counseling. In D. L. Baker, J. L. Schuette, & W. R. Uhlmann (Eds.), A guide to genetic counseling (pp. 127–166). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Fine, B. A. (1993). The evolution of nondirectiveness in genetic counseling and implications of the human genome project. In D. M. Bartels, B. S. LeRoy, & A. L. Caplan (Eds.), Prescribing our future: Ethical challenges in genetic counseling (pp. 101–117). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Frankel, R. M., Quill, T. E., & McDaniel, S. H. (Eds.) (2003). The biopsychosocial approach: Past, present, future. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
- Green, M. J., Peterson, S. K., Baker, M. W., Harper, G. R., Friedman, L. C., Rubinstein, W. S., et al. (2004). Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 292, 442–452.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hamann, J., Leucht, S., & Kissling, W. (2003). Shared decision-making in psychiatry. Acta Psychiatr Scand, 107, 403–409.Google Scholar
- Kessler, S. (1979). The counselor–counselee relationship. In S. Kessler (Ed.), Genetic counseling: Psychological dimensions (pp. 53–63). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- McCarthy Veach, P., LeRoy, B. S., & Bartels, D. M. (2003). Facilitating the genetic counseling process: A manual for practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- McDaniel, S. H., Hepworth, J., & Doherty, W. J. (1992). Medical family therapy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Miller, W. R. (2004). Motivational interviewing in service to health promotion. Am J Health Promot, 18(3), A1–A10.Google Scholar
- Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- National Society of Genetic Counselors (1992). Code of ethics. J Genet Counsel, 1, 1–43.Google Scholar
- Pew Health Professions Commission (1994). Health professions education and relationship-centered care: Report of the Pew–Fetzer Task Force. San Francisco: UCSF Center for the Health Professions.Google Scholar
- Sorenson, J. R. (1993). Genetic counseling: Values that have mattered. In D. M. Bartels, B. S. LeRoy, & A. L. Caplan (Eds.), Prescribing our future: Ethical challenges in genetic counseling (pp. 3–14). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- van Roosmalen, M. S., Stalmeier, P. F. M., Verhoef, L. C. G., Hoekstra-Weebers, J. E. H. M., Oosterwijk, J. C., Hoogerbrugge, N., et al. (2004). Randomized trial of a shared decision-making intervention consisting of trade-offs and individualized treatment information for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol, 22, 3293–3301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weil, J. (2000). Psychosocial genetic counseling. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar