Abstract
Critics of genetic discourse are concerned that deterministic and discriminatory views of genetics are increasingly becoming adopted. These views argue that current genetic discourse becomes a source of power whereby powerful institutions harm people with so-called “bad” genes. This essay argues that current analyses of the power of genetics discourse are grounded in an improper reading that disempowers patients. Deploying Michel Foucault's concept “care of the self,” this essay claims that genetics discourse is better understood as a way that patients take on power through rhetoric rather than a force that has power over patients. Through a close reading of the “My Family Health Portrait” program, this paper argues that patients experience a process of “subjection” wherein they become agents of and objects of genetics discourse both. This alternative mode of analyzing the power of genetics discourse has implications for our collective understanding of the operations of the care of the self and the uses of genetic information that we propose.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barker, J. R., & Cheney, G. (1994). The concept and the practices of discipline in contemporary organizational life. Communication Monographs, 61, 19–43.
Bates, B. R. (2005). Public culture and public understanding of genetics: A focus group study. Public Understand Sci, 14, 47–65.
Bates, B. R., Poirot, K., Harris, T. M., Condit, C. M., & Achter, P. J. (2004). Evaluating direct-to-consumer marketing of race-based pharmacogenomics: A focus group study of public understandings of applied genomic medication. J Health Commun, 9, 541–59.
Bauer, M. W. (2002). Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology: A cultivation analysis. Public Understand Sci, 11, 93–111.
Beers, M. H., & Berkow, R. (1999). Merck manual of diagnosis and therapy, 17th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Brookey, R. A. (2001). Bio-rhetoric, background beliefs and the biology of homosexuality. Argumentation and Advocacy, 37, 171–83.
Brown, M. (2004). Taking care of business: Self-help and sleep medicine in American corporate culture. J Med Humanities, 25, 173–87.
Buckholtz, A. (2004, Nov. 16). Tracing your health roots: plant a health family tree now, and it could bear fruit for generations. Washington Post, HE1.
Burke, K. (1969). Grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Carmona, R. (2004, Nov. 8). Press conference to launch “U.S. Surgeon General's Family History Initiative.” Remarks as prepared, Department of Health and Human Services, National Press Club, Washington, DC.
Ceci, C. (2003). Midnight reckonings: On a question of knowledge and nursing. Nurs Philos, 4, 61–76.
Cheek, J., & Rudge, T. (1994). The panopticon revisited?: An exploration of the social and political dimensions of contemporary health care and nursing practice. Int J Nurs Stud, 31, 583–91.
Clegg, S. R. (1989). Frameworks of power. London: SAGE.
Condit, C. M. (1999a). How the public understands genetics: non-deterministic and non-discriminatory interpretations of the “blueprint” metaphor. Public Understand Sci, 8, 169–180.
Condit, C. M. (1999b). The meanings of the gene. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Conn, M. (2004, Nov. 24). Doctors: Learn family's medical history. Marshfield (WI) News-Herald.
Conrad, P. (1999). Uses of expertise: sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news. Public Understand Sci, 8, 285–302.
Conrad, P. (2001). Genetic optimism: framing genes and mental illness in the news. Cult Med Psychiatry, 25, 225–47.
Conrad, P., & Markens, S. (2001). Constructing the “gay gene” in the news: optimism and skepticism in the US and British press. Health, 5, 373–400.
Craig, D. A. (2000). Ethical language and themes in news coverage of genetic testing. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 160–74.
Ellis, C. (2003). Foucault, feminism, and informed choice. J Med Humanities, 24, 213–28.
Elwyn, G. (2004). Arriving at the postmodern medical consultation. Eur J Gen Pract, 10, 93–7.
Fahy, K. (2002). Reflecting on practice to theorise empowerment for women: Using Foucault's concepts. Aust J Midwifery, 15, 5–13.
Finkler, K. (2000). Experiencing the new genetics: Family and kinship on the medical frontier. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Foucault, M. (1980). Prison talk. In C. Gordon (ed.), Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1983). Afterword: The subject of power. In H.L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1986). History of Sexuality, Volume 3: Care of the Self. New York: Vintage.
Foucault, M. (1997). The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. New York: New Press.
Frank, A. W. & Jones, T. (2003). Bioethics and the later Foucault. J Med Humanities, 24, 179–86.
Geller, G., Tambor, E. S., Bernhardt, B. A., Rodgers, J., & Holtzman, N. A. (2003). Houseofficers' reactions to media coverage about the sequencing of the human genome. Soc Sci Med, 56, 2211–2220.
Genetic information nondiscrimination act of 2003: Report. (2003). 108th Cong., 1st Sess. Rep. 108–122.
Georges, J. M. (2003). An emerging discourse: Toward epistemic diversity in nursing. Adv Nurs Sci, 26, 44–52.
Gibson, D. (2004). The gaps in the gaze in South African hospitals. Soc Sci Med, 59, 2013–24.
Gilbert, T. (2003). Exploring the dynamics of power: A Foucauldian analysis of care planning in learning disabilities services. Nurs Inq, 10, 37–46.
Goldstein, D. M. (2003). Reproductive technologies of the self: Michel Foucault and meta-narrative-ethics. J Med Humanities, 24, 229–40.
Gollust, S. E., Hull, S. C., & Wilfond, B. S. (2002). Limitations of direct-to-consumer advertising for clinical genetic testing. JAMA, 288, 1762–1767.
Gostin, L. O., & Hodge, J. G. (1999).Genetic privacy and the law: An end to genetics exceptionalism. Jurimetrics, 40, 21–58.
Harley, D. (1994). Political post-mortems and morbid anatomy in seventeenth-century England. Soc Hist Med, 7, 1–28.
Henderson, L., & Kitzinger, J. (1999). The human drama of genetics: “hard” and “soft” media representations of inherited breast cancer. Sociol Health and Illn, 21, 560–578.
HHS launches new family health history initiative. (2004, Nov. 8). States News Service.
Hick, C. (1999). The art of perception: From the life world to the medical gaze and back again. Med Health Care Philos, 2, 129–40.
Holmes, D. & Gastaldo, D. (2002). Nursing as a means of governmentality. J Adv Nurs, 38, 557–565.
Holmes, D. (2001). From iron gaze to nursing care: Mental health nursing in the era of panopticism. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs, 8, 7–15.
Hubbard, R., & Wald, E. (1999). Exploding the gene myth, 3rd ed. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hustead, J. L., & Goldman, J. (2002). Genetics and privacy. Am J Law Med, 28, 285–307.
Jaret, P. (2001). 10 Ways to improve patient compliance. Hippocrates, 15(2).
Kellogg, S. (2004, Nov. 26). When family gathers, talk about health. Newhouse News Service.
Kinsman, G. (1996). “Responsibility” as a strategy of governance: Regulating people living with AIDS and lesbians and gay men in Ontario. Economy and Society, 25, 393–409.
Krumm, J. (2002). Genetic discrimination: Why Congress must ban genetic testing in the workplace. J Legal Med, 23, 491–521.
Learmonth, M. (1998). Kindly technicians: Hospital administrators immediately before the NHS. J Manag Med, 12, 323–330.
Lynch, J. (2004). Foucault on targets. J Health Organiz Manag, 18, 128–135.
MacDonald, C., & Williams-Jones, B. (2002). Ethics and genetics: Susceptibility testing in the workplace. J Business Ethics, 35, 235–241.
Manias, E. & Street, A. (2000). Possibilities for critical social theory and Foucault's work: A toolbox approach. Nurs Inq, 7, 50–60.
Mayeaux, E. J., Murphy, P. W., Arnold, C., Davis, T. C., Jackson, R. H., & Sentell, T. (1996). Improving patient education for patients with low literacy skills. Am Fam Physician, 53, 205–11.
National Family History Day declared by surgeon general. (2004, Nov. 25). Early Show 7:00 AM EST CBS.
Nelkin, D., & Lindee, M. S. (1995). The DNA mystique. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Nordgren, A. (2003). Metaphors in behavioral genetics. Theoret Med, 24, 59–77.
Nye, R. A. (2003). The evolution of the concept of medicalization in the late twentieth century. J Hist Behav Sci, 39, 115–29.
O'Malley, P. (1998). Consuming risks: Harm minimisation and the government of drug users. In R. Smandych (Ed.). Governable places. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
Ong, A. (1995). Making the biopolitical subject: Cambodian immigrants, refugee medicine and cultural citizenship in California. Soc Sci Med, 40, 1243–57.
Peckover, S. (2002). Supporting and policing mothers: An analysis of the disciplinary practices of health visiting. J Adv Nursing, 38, 369–377.
Peerson, A. (1995). Foucault and modern medicine. Nurs Inq, 2, 106–114.
Petersen, A. (1999). The portrayal of research in genetic-based differences of sex and sexual orientation: a study of ‘popular' science journals, 1980–1997. J Commun Inq, 23, 163–182.
Petersen, A. (2003). Governmentality, critical scholarship, and the medical humanities. J Med Humanities, 24, 187–201.
Pollock, A. (2003). Complicating power in high-tech reproduction: Narratives of anonymous paid egg donors. J Med Humanities, 25, 241–263.
Prado, C. G. (2003). Foucauldian ethics and elective death. J Med Humanities, 24, 203–211.
Priest, S. H. (1995). Information equity, public understanding of science, and the biotechnology debate. J Commun, 45, 39–54.
Public awareness and attitudes about reproductive genetic technology. (2002, Dec. 9). Genetics and public policy research center, Johns Hopkins University.
Rapp, R. (1999). Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.
Rawlinson, M. C. (1987). Foucault's strategy: Knowledge, power, and the specificity of truth. J Med Philos, 12, 371–95.
Rendell, J. (2004). A testimony to Muzil: Herve Guibert, Foucault, and the medical gaze. J Med Humanities, 25, 33–45.
Ritter, J. (2004, Nov. 25). U.S. encourages knowing family medical histories. Chicago (IL) Sun-Times.
Rock, M. (2003). Death, taxes, public opinion, and the Midas touch of Mary Tyler Moore: Accounting for promises by politicians to help avert and control diabetes. Med Anthropol Q, 17, 200–232.
Rose, N., & Novas, C. (2005). Biological citizenship. In A. Ong & S.J. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Rothenberg, K. H., & Terry, S. F. (2002). Before it's too late—addressing fear of genetic information. Science, 297, 196–197.
Rothman, B. K. (Norton, 1998). Genetic maps and human imaginations: The limits of science in understanding who we are. New York: W.W.
Ryan, J. (1991). Observing and normalizing: Foucault, discipline and inequalities in schooling. J Educ Thought, 25, 104–119.
Schatz, G. S. (2002). Health records privacy and confidentiality: pending questions. J Contemp Health Law Policy, 18, 685–689.
Schillo, K. K., & Thompson, P. B. (2003). Postmodernism for animal scientists. J Animal Sci, 81, 2989–2994.
Scott, C. E. (1987). The power of medicine, the power of ethics. J Med Philos, 12, 335–50.
Senay, E. (2004, Nov. 25). Thanksgiving: Family history day. Early Show 7:00 AM EST CBS.
Singer, E., Corning, A. D., Antonucci, T. (1999). Attitudes toward genetic testing and fetal diagnosis, 1990–1996. J Health Soc Behav, 40, 429–445.
Smith, A. (2004, Nov. 22). Family history is important for your health. Post-Standard (Syracuse, NY), D1.
Steiner, J. F., & Earnest, M. A. (2000). The language of medication-taking. Ann Intern Med, 132, 926–30.
Swerdloff, D. (2004, Nov. 10). Sharing family health information at Thanksgiving. Voice of America News.
Taussig, K.-S., Rapp, R., & Heath, D. (2003). Flexible eugenics: Technologies of the self in the age of genetics. In A.H. Goodman, D. Heath, & M.S. Lindee (Eds.), Genetic nature/culture: Anthropology and science beyond the two-culture divide. University of California Press: Berkeley.
Thomas, K. H. (2004, Nov. 21). Holidays are a good time to focus on health history. Atlanta (GA) Journal-Constitution, 8MS.
Toast family's health on Thanksgiving Day. (2004, Nov. 15).The (Springfield, MA) Republican.
Turkey, football and ... family genetic history? (2004, Nov. 23). Thanksgiving gatherings are perfect opportunities to discuss family health histories, says Karmanos Cancer Institute. PR Newswire US,.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Healthy people 2010: Understanding and improving health. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
United States Surgeon General. (2004). My family health portrait: The Surgeon General's family history initiative. http://www.hhs.gov/familyhistory/downloads/MyFamilyHealthPortrait-English.pdf.
Weir, L. (1996). Recent developments in the government of pregnancy. Economy and Society, 25, 372–92.
Werner, D. (2004, Dec. 5) Climb into your family tree. Vail (CO) Daily, 4.
Willems, D. (2000). Managing one's body using self-management techniques: Practicing autonomy. Theor Med Bioeth, 21, 23–38.
Zimmerman, B. K. (1999). The use of genetic information and public accountability. Public Understand Sci, 8, 223–40.
Zoller, H. M. (2003). Working out: Managerialism in workplace health promotion. Management Communication Quarterly, 17, 171–205.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bates, B.R. Care of the Self and Patient Participation in Genetic Discourse: A Foucauldian Reading of the Surgeon General's “My Family Health Portrait” Program. J Genet Counsel 14, 423–434 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-005-4845-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-005-4845-5