The study presents the ethical concerns the authors have identified as necessary to address for methodologically sound qualitative research with survivors of gender-based violence. The aim is to define questions that need to be addressed before research with this vulnerable and diverse group can be considered so that the threat of inflicting further harm is mitigated and the possible positive impact of research is increased. We outline and compare the merits and possible drawbacks of three different approaches to research with gender-based violence survivors.
We compare the ethical/methodological rationale and approaches used in three different projects employing mixed-method exploratory research, survivor-centered qualitative interview-based research and experimental research through practices from the theatre of the oppressed. The comparison centers on showing the relative advantages of individual approaches in terms of ethics in practice.
The individual studies and their comparison confirm the ongoing salience of ethical considerations outlined by, e.g., proponents of feminist participatory action research; our findings also underline the necessity of considering the social contexts of violence and the need to adjust research design to ethics.
Our study shows that using research designs that do not lead to direct empowerment of survivors should only be considered after other options have been tried and proven inefficient. Ethical considerations need to be holistic, focusing on preventing further harm and paying attention to the social contexts of violence and the impact of representing the research results.
This is a preview of subscription content,to check access.
Access this article
Similar content being viewed by others
The English version of the Code is available online: https://www.avcr.cz/en/about-us/legal-regulations/code-of-ethics-for-researchers-of-the-czech-academy-of-sciences/ (Cited on March 24, 2023).
The English version of the Code is available online: https://cuni.cz/UKEN-731.html (Cited on March 24, 2023).
In March 2021 – a month after publishing research report - 25 media outputs were scored by the press department of Faculty of Humanities, Charles University of Prague.
Interviews are collected by the second author, Dana Moree, at the time of writing of this article.
One of the authors is trained in the method and has worked with a wide range of marginalized groups for ten years.
The system of assistance consists of three main “pillars”: the Police of the Czech Republic; child protection services and intervention centres; the judicial system.
Under Czech law, a person suspected of committing domestic violence may be temporarily evicted from a shared dwelling using an eviction (also known as barring) order for ten days (the period may be substantially prolonged by the court). Such eviction can be ordered by law enforcement officers or directly by the court.
One of the authors, Blanka Nyklová, was previously approached by another NGO to help design a quantitative questionnaire and later edit an extended research report from a mixed-method research project into sexualized violence. Her involvement was less direct and we therefore do not detail it here, although it did impact her work with NGOs working with survivors.
Baker, J., & Lalonde, D. (2020). Toward a trauma-and violence-informed Research Ethics Module: Considerations and recommendations. London, Ontario: Western University. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27626.03523.
Boal, A. (1979). Theatre of the oppressed. New York: Urizen Books.
Boal, A. (1992). Games for actors and non-actors. New York: Routledge.
Burgess-Proctor, A. (2015). Methodological and ethical issues in feminist research with abused women: Reflections on participants’ vulnerability and empowerment. Women’s Studies International Forum, 48, 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.10.014.
Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Čechová, J., & Jandová, H. (n.d.). Stop znásilnění. Analýza stavu pomoci obětem znásilnění v České republice. Brno. Retrieved from http://www.persefona.cz/source/pdf/analyza_Stop_znasilneni.pdf
Clark, J. (2009). Acting up and speaking out: Using Theatre of the oppressed and collective memory work as alternative research methods and empowerment tools in work with girls. Agenda, 23(79), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2009.9676223.
Clark, J. J., & Walker, R. (2011). Research Ethics in Victimization Studies: Widening the Lens. Violence Against Women, 17(12), 1489–1508. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801211436167.
Dragiewicz, M., Woodlock, D., Easton, H., Harris, B., & Salter, M. (2023). I’ll be Okay”: Survivors’ perspectives on participation in domestic Violence Research. Journal of Family Violence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00518-6.
Elliott, D. E., Bjelajac, P., Fallot, R. D., Markoff, L. S., & Reed, B. G. (2005). Trauma-informed or trauma-denied: Principles and implementation of trauma-informed services for women. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(4), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20063.
Ellsberg, M., & Heise, L. (2005). Researching violence against women. A Practial Guide for researchers and activists. Washington, D.C.: World Health Organization, PATH.
European Agency for Fundamental Rights. (2014). Violence against women: An EU-wide survey main results violence against women: An EU-wide survey. https://doi.org/10.2811/62230
Freire, P. (1992). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Graff, A. (2014). Report from the gender trenches: War against “genderism” in Poland. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 21(4), 431–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506814546091.
Graff, A., & Korolczuk, E. (2021). Anti-gender politics in the populist moment. In Anti-Gender Politics in the Populist Moment. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003133520
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “Ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360.
Guillemin, M., Gillam, L., Rosenthal, D., & Bolitho, A. (2012, July). Human research ethics committees: Examining their roles and practices. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7, 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.38.
Gunsalus, C. K., Bruner, E. M., Burbules, N. C., Dash, L., Finkin, M., Goldberg, J. P., & Pratt, M. G. (n.d.). Mission Creep in the IRB World.
Haggerty, K. D. (2004). Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the name of Ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391–414. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAS.0000049239.15922.a3.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The scientific question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Harding, S. (1986). The Science question in feminism. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture´s consequences:Comparing values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, London: SAGE.
Hokr Miholová, P., Ondrušková, J., & Dohnal, D. (2016). Ekonomické dopady domácího násilí na zdraví. Praha.
John, N., Casey, S. E., Carino, G., & McGovern, T. (2020). Lessons never learned: Crisis and gender-based violence. Developing World Bioethics, 20(2), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12261.
Klein, R. (2012). Responding to intimate violence against women: The role of informal networks. London: Cambridge University Press.
Kutálková, P., & Kobová, Ľ. (Eds.). (2014). Sexuální násilí: proč se nikdo neptá? Praha: In Iustitia.
Leung, L., Miedema, S., Warner, X., Homan, S., & Fulu, E. (2019). Making feminism count: Integrating feminist research principles in large-scale quantitative research on violence against women and girls. Gender & Development, 27(3), 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2019.1668142.
Levenson, J. (2017). Trauma-informed social work practice. Social Work, 62(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swx001.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action Research and Minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x.
Lykes, M. B., & Hershberg, R. M. (2012). Participatory action research and feminisms. Social inequalities and transformative praxis. In S. Nagy Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis (pp. 331–367). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: SAGE. Retrieved from http://file://Users/alex.neumann/Documents/MendeleyDesktop/EditedbyEditedby/World/[Darren_Swanson]_Creating_Adaptive_Policies_A_Gui(BookSee.org).pdf.
Mamotte, N., & Wassenaar, D. (2009). Ethics review in a developing country: A survey of south african social scientists’ experiences. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: JERHRE, 4(4), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2009.4.4.69.
Marín, C. (2007). A methodology rooted in Praxis: Theatre of the oppressed (TO) techniques employed as Arts-Based Educational Research Methods. Youth Theatre Journal, 21(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/08929092.2007.10012598.
Milner, I. V., H. R (2007). Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and Unforeseen. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 388–400. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013.
Moree, D. (2018). Qualitative approaches to studying marginalized communities. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.246
Moree, D., Vávrová, T., & Felcmanová, A. (2017). Blue or red? Why do categories attract? The Urban Review, 49(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-016-0396-3
Newman, E., Risch, E., & Kassam-Adams, N. (2006). Ethical issues in trauma-related research: A review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(3), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2006.1.3.29.
Nikischer, A. (2019). Vicarious trauma inside the academe: Understanding the impact of teaching, researching and writing violence. Higher Education, 77, 905–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0308-4.
Nyklová, B., Michálková, E., Gubová, N., Peterková, I., & Piknová, T. (2022). Bariéry v systému pomoci obětem partnerského násilí. Praha.
Nyklová, B., & Moree, D. (2021). Násilí na ženách v souvislosti s covid-19. Praha. Retrieved from https://www.soc.cas.cz/sites/default/files/publikace/blanka_nyklova_dana_moree_-_nasili_na_zenach_v_souvislosti_s_covid-19.pdf
Peterman, A., Potts, A., O’donnell, M., Thompson, K., Shah, N., Oertelt-Prigione, S., & Van Gelder, N. (2020). Pandemics and Violence Against Women and Children. Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.cgdev.org
Pikálková, S., Buriánek, J., Linková, M., Červinková, A., Šaldová, K., Tupá, B., & Huňková, M. (2004). In Pikálková (Ed.), Mezinárodní výzkum násilí na ženách – Česká republika/2003: Příspěvek k sociologickému zkoumání násilí v rodině. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.
Pitt, P. (2013). The project cannot be approved in its current form”: Feminist visual research meets the human research ethics committee. The Australian Educational Researcher, 41, 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0136-6.
Potts, A., Kolli, H., & Fattal, L. (2022). Whose voices matter? Using participatory, feminist and anthropological approaches to centre power and positionality in research on gender-based violence in emergencies. Global Public Health, 17(10), 2530–2546. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2022.2062026.
Preissle, J., & Han, Y. (2012). Feminist research ethics. In S. Nagy Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis (pp. 583–605). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: SAGE. Retrieved from http://file:///Users/alex.neumann/Documents/MendeleyDesktop/Edited by Edited by/World/[Darren_Swanson]_Creating_Adaptive_Policies_A_Gui(BookSee.org).pdf.
Rivkin-Fish, M., & Hartblay, C. (2014). When Global LGBTQ Advocacy Became Entangled with New Cold War Sentiment: A Call for Examining Russian Queer Experience. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 21(1), 95–111. Retrieved from http://sfx5.exlibrisgroup.com:3210/hsrc?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=article&sid=ProQ:ProQ%3Apoliticalscience&atitle=When+Global+LGBTQ+Advocacy+Became+E.
Schroeter, S. (2013). “The way it works” doesn’t: Theatre of the oppressed as critical pedagogy and counternarrative. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l‘education, 36(4), 394–415.
Shreeves, R., & Prpic, M. (2019). Briefing. Violence against women in the EU: State of play. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2018/630296/EPRS_BRI(2018)630296_EN.pdf
Sprague, J., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1999). A feminist epistemology. In J. Saltzman Chafetz (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of gender (pp. 25–43). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36218-5_2
Sutrop, M., & Lõuk, K. (2022). Ethical research in a global context: a dynamic tension between universalvalues, principles and contextual applications. In Ethical Evidence and Policymaking: Interdisciplinary and International Research (pp. 15–39). Bristol: Bristol University Press. Retrieved from https://about.jstor.org/terms
Thompson, B. (1995). Ethical dimensions in trauma research. The American Sociologist, Part II: Sociology, Law, and Ethics, 26(2), 54–69. Retrieved from https://about.jstor.org/terms
Towers, J., Balderston, S., Corradi, C., Heiskanen, M., Helweg-larsen, K., Mergaert, L., & Strid, S. (2017). Conceptualising violence and gender. The concept and measurement of violence (pp. 31–55). Bristol: Policy Press.
Usher, K., Bradbury Jones, C., Bhullar, N., Durkin, D. J., Gyamfi, N., Fatema, S. R., & Jackson, D. (2021). COVID-19 and family violence: Is this a perfect storm? International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 30(4), 1022–1032. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12876.
van der Kolk, B. A. (2005). Developmental trauma disorder: Toward a rational diagnosis for children with complex trauma histories. Psychiatric Annals, 35(5), 401–408. https://doi.org/10.3928/00485713-20050501-06.
van der Kolk, B. A. (2015). The body keeps the score: Mind, brain and body in the transformation of trauma. London: Penguin Books.
Varcoe, C. M., Wathen, C. N., Ford-Gilboe, M., Smye, V., & Browne, A. (2016). VEGA Briefing Note on Trauma- and Violence-Informed Care.
Verloo, M., & Paternotte, D. (2018). The Feminist Project under threat in Europe. Politics and Governance, 6(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i3.1736.
Vidu, A., Valls, R., Puigvert, L., Melgar, P., & Joanpere, M. (2017). Second order of sexual harassment - SOSH. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.0.2505.
Walby, S. (2013). Violence and society: Introduction to an emerging field of sociology. Current Sociology, 61(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392112456478.
Williamson, E., Gregory, A., Abrahams, H., Aghtaie, N., Walker, S. J., & Hester, M. (2020). Secondary trauma: Emotional Safety in Sensitive Research. Journal of Academic Ethics, 18(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09348-y.
Withers, D. M. (2010). Complicated inheritance: Sistershow (1973–1974) and the queering of feminism. Women: A Cultural Review, 29(3), 309–322.
Wrentschur, M. (2008). Forum Theatre as a Participatory Tool for Social Research and Development: A reflection on ‘Nobody is perfect’ – a project with homeless people. In P. Cox, T. Geisen, & R. Green (Eds.), Qualitative research and Social Change. European contexts (pp. 94–111). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wynn, L. L. (2011). Ethnographers’ Experiences of Institutional Ethics Oversight: Results from a quantitative and qualitative survey. Journal of Policy History, 23(1), 94–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898030610000333.
Yeater, E., Miller, G., Rinehart, J., & Nason, E. (2012). Trauma and Sex Surveys Meet Minimal Risk Standards: Implications for Institutional Review Boards. Psychological Science, Vol. 23, pp. 780–787. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435131
Zeman, P. (2020). Sdělení NSZ k postihování případů domácího a sexuálního násilí v souvislosti s nouzovým stavem. Brno: Nejvyšší státní zastupitelství. Retrieved from https://verejnazaloba.cz/nsz/sdeleni-nsz-k-postihovani-pripadu-domaciho-a-sexualniho-nasili-v-souvislosti-s-nouzovym-stavem/
Persefona (2016). Sexuální násilí očima české veřejnosti. Brno. Retrieved from http://www.zlabyrintunasili.cz/assets/persefona-senat-prezentace.pdf
Problematika domácího násilí optikou české populace. Brno.
The research presented in the paper was funded by an Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway Funds grant no. LP-HRMGSA-009 Research Center for Domestic and Gender-Based Violence (ReCeGe).
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare that are relevant to this article.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Nyklová, B., Moree, D. & Kubala, P. Who Gets heard/hurt in Gender-Based Domestic Violence Research: Comparing Ethical Concerns in Three Qualitative Research Designs. J Fam Viol 38, 1127–1138 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00589-5