Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 34, Issue 8, pp 781–793 | Cite as

Identifying how to Engage Men in Domestic Violence Research: a Concept Mapping Study

  • Raglan MaddoxEmail author
  • Patricia O’Campo
  • Jonathan Grove
  • Michael Yonas
  • Carlos Chan
  • Aly Kassam
  • Alisa Velonis
Original Article

Abstract

The Engaging Men project aimed to identify facilitators, societal approaches to and support for domestic violence, and barriers to men’s participation in domestic violence research, assessing the importance of each factor. Participatory concept mapping was used with a convenience sample of men (n = 142) in person and online across Australia, Canada and the United States of America. Engaging Men identified 43 facilitators, societal approaches to and support for domestic violence, and/or barriers to men’s participation in domestic violence research. The strongest facilitators related to external connections, such as concern for women around them. Men also recognized societal approaches to and support for domestic violence and the strongest barriers centered on internal feelings, including fear, shame and guilt about being linked to domestic violence. This study suggests that providing a safe environment for men to express genuine thoughts, feeling and views about domestic violence is vital, yet rarely available in domestic violence research. Therefore, research opportunities need to be more effectively designed and incentivized to address challenging issues identified by men, such as fear, shame and guilt and offer meaningful opportunities to demonstrate positive change.

Keywords

Engaging men Intimate partner violence Intimate partner violence research Domestic violence Concept mapping 

References

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Personal safety. Retrieved from Canberra, Australia:Google Scholar
  2. Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse. (2011). The Impact of Domestic Violence on Children: A Literature Review.Google Scholar
  3. Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., et al. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 25.Google Scholar
  4. Burke, J. G., O’Campo, P., Peak, G. L., Gielen, A. C., McDonnell, K. A., & Trochim, W. M. K. (2005). An introduction to concept mapping as a participatory public Health Research method. Qualitative Health Research, 15(10), 1392–1410.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305278876.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Casey, E. A., Leek, C., Tolman, R. M., Allen, C. T., & Carlson, J. M. (2017). Getting men in the room: Perceptions of effective strategies to initiate men’s involvement in gender-based violence prevention in a global sample. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 19(9), 979–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cox, P. (2015). Violence Against Women in Australia: Additional Analysis of the Australian Bureau of Statistics' Personal Safety Survey, 2012: ANROWS.Google Scholar
  7. Daoud, N., Urquia, M. L., O'Campo, P., Heaman, M., Janssen, P. A., Smylie, J., & Thiessen, K. (2012). Prevalence of abuse and violence before, during, and after pregnancy in a National Sample of Canadian women. American Journal of Public Health, 102(10), 1893–1901.  https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2012.300843.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellsberg, M., Jansen, H., Heise, L., Watts, C. H., & Garcia-Moreno, C. (2008). WHO multi-country study on Women's health and domestic violence against women study team. Intimate partner violence and women's physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence: An observational study. Lancet, 371(9619), 1165–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fetterman, D. M. (2001). Foundations of empowerment evaluation: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Flood, M. (2010). Where men stand: Men's roles in ending violence against women.Google Scholar
  11. Flood, M. (2015). Work with men to end violence against women: a critical stocktake. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(sup2), 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Funk, R. E. (2006). Reaching men: Strategies for preventing sexist attitudes, behaviors, and violence: Jist life.Google Scholar
  13. Grove, J. (2012). Engaging men against violence. In G. Kirk & M. Okazawa-Rey (Eds.), Women's Lives: Multicultural Perspectives (6 ed.): McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Jewkes, R., Flood, M., & Lang, J. (2015). From work with men and boys to changes of social norms and reduction of inequities in gender relations: A conceptual shift in prevention of violence against women and girls. The Lancet, 385(9977), 1580–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kane, M., & Trochim, W. M. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation (Vol. 50): Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Kimball, E., Edleson, J. L., Tolman, R. M., Neugut, T. B., & Carlson, J. (2013). Global efforts to engage men in preventing violence against women: An international survey. Violence Against Women, 19(7), 924–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Minerson, T. (2011). Issue brief: Engaging men and boys to reduce and prevent gender-based violence.Google Scholar
  18. O'Campo, P., Smylie, J., Minh, A., Omand, M., & Cyriac, A. (2015). Conceptualizing acts and behaviours that comprise intimate partner violence: A concept map. Health Expectations, 18(6), 1968–1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice (Fourth Edition ed.). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Southern, D., Batterham, R., Appleby, N., Young, D., Dunt, D., & Guibert, R. (1999). The concept mapping method. An alternative to focus group inquiry in general practice. Australian family physician, 28, S35–S40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Statistics Canada. (2011). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile. Retrieved from Ottawa, ON:Google Scholar
  22. Trochim, W. M. (1985). Pattern matching, validity, and conceptualization in program evaluation. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 575–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Trochim, W. M. K. (1989). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(89)90016-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. United Nations. (1993). United Nations declaration on the elimination of violence against women. In.Google Scholar
  25. Velonis, A. J. (2013). Are all hits the same? A mixed methods investigation of gender and violence in heterosexual relationships.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Well Living House, Centre for Urban Health SolutionsThe Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s HospitalTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of HealthUniversity of CanberraCanberraAustralia
  3. 3.Centre for Urban Health SolutionsThe Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s HospitalTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Dalla Lana School of Public HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  5. 5.Interdisciplinary Arts and SciencesUniversity of Washington TacomaTacomaUSA
  6. 6.The Pittsburgh FoundationPittsburghUSA
  7. 7.Michael G. DeGroote School of MedicineMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  8. 8.School of Public Health, Division of Community Health SciencesUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations