Abstract
Despite a rapidly growing U.S. Latinx child population and this group’s representation in the child welfare system (CWS), limited research exists on Latinx children reported to the CWS for child sexual abuse (CSA). This study examined how the intersection of race/ethnicity, age, and biological sex impact case substantiation among Latinx, Black, and White children reported for CSA. We analyzed 2012 National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System Child File data using generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to examine a sample of children reported to the CWS for CSA (n = 179,199). GLMMs indicated that among children reported for CSA, Black (AOR = 1.12) and White (AOR = 1.17) children had significantly higher odds of case substantiation compared to Latinx children, controlling for other factors. Main effects indicate older children (in mean-centered years; OR = 1.09) and female children (OR = 2.52) had higher odds of substantiation. Out of the states included in the post-hoc analysis, 16 (84%) had female to male substantiation ratios that were higher for Latinx children compared to White children. In these same states, only 9 (56%) had ratios for Black children that were higher than the rate for White children. Results indicate it is critical to continue examining how child sex, race/ethnicity, age, and state differences may affect CSA case substantiation rates. These findings underscore the importance of providing accessible culturally and linguistically appropriate CWS services that are also responsive to sex and developmental stage.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Hereafter, the term White refers to non-Latinx White people, and Black refers to non-Latinx Black people.
References
Ayón, C. (2009). Shorter time-lines, yet higher hurdles: Mexican families’ access to child welfare mandated services. Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.11.004.
Bartholet, E. (2009). The racial disproportionality movement in child welfare: False facts and dangerous directions. Arizona Law Review, 51, 871–932.
Bartolet, E., Wulczyn, F., Barth, R., & Lederman, C. (2011). Race and child welfare. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall.
Baumann, D. J., Dalgleish, L., Fluke, J., & Kern, H. (2011). The decision-making ecology. Washington, DC: American Humane Association.
Beitchman, J. H., Zucker, K. J., Hood, J. E., Dacosta, G. A., & Akman, D. (1991). A review of the short-term effects of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 15, 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(91)90038-F.
Beitchman, J. H., Zucker, K. J., Hood, J. E., Dacosta, G. A., Akman, D., & Cassavia, E. (1992). A review of the long-term effects of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 16, 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(92)90011-F.
Belsky, J. (1993). Etiology of child maltreatment: A developmental-ecological analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 413–434.
Boyd, R. (2014). African American disproportionality and disparity in child welfare: Toward a comprehensive conceptual framework. Children and Youth Services Review, 37, 15–27.
Brown, J., Cohen, P., Johnson, J. G., & Salzinger, S. (1998). A longitudinal analysis of risk factors for child maltreatment: Findings of a 17-year prospective study of officially recorded and self-reported child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22(11), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00087-8.
Child Trends. (2013). Screening and risk for developmental delay: Indicators on children and youth. Washington, DC: Child Trends Data Bank.
Church, W. T., Gross, E. R., & Baldwin, J. (2005). Maybe ignorance is not always bliss: The disparate treatment of Hispanics within the child welfare system. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 1279–1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.01.003.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039.
Dettlaff, A. J., Rivaux, S. R., Baumann, D. J., Fluke, J. D., Rycraft, J. R., & James, J. (2011). Disentangling substantiation: The influence of race, income, and risk on the substantiation decision in child welfare. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 1630–1637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.04.005.
Devries, K. M., Mak, J. Y., Child, J. C., Falder, G., Bacchus, L. J., Astbury, J., & Watts, C. H. (2014). Childhood sexual abuse and suicidal behavior: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 133, 1331–1344. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-2166.
Drake, B. (1996). Unraveling “unsubstantiated.” Child Maltreatment, 1, 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559596001003008.
Drake, B., Jolley, J. M., Lanier, P., Fluke, J., Barth, R. P., & Jonson-Reid, M. (2011). Racial bias in child protection? A comparison of competing explanations using national data. Pediatrics, 127(3), 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1710.
Eckenrode, J., Powers, J., Doris, J., Munsch, J., & Bolger, N. (1988). Substantiation of child abuse and neglect reports. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.1.9.
Eckenrode, J., Smith, E. G., McCarthy, M. E., & Dineen, M. (2014). Income inequality and child maltreatment in the United States. Pediatrics, 133(3), 454–461. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1707.
English, D. J., Marshall, D. B., Coghlan, L., Brummel, S., & Orme, M. (2002). Causes and consequences of the substantiation decision in Washington state child protective services. Children and Youth Services Review, 24, 817–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-7409(02)00241-4.
English, D. J., Upadhyaya, M. P., Litrownik, A. J., Marshall, J. M., Runyan, D. K., Graham, J. C., & Dubowitz, H. (2005). Maltreatment's wake: The relationship of maltreatment dimensions to child outcomes. Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(5), 597–619.
Finno-Velasquez, M., Shuey, E. A., Kotake, C., & Miller, J. J. (2015). Cultural considerations in refining intervention designs. In D. Daro, A. Cohn Donnelly, L. A. Huang, & B. J. Powell (Eds.), Advances in child abuse prevention knowledge: The perspective of new leadership (pp. 93–117). Cham, Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16327-7_5.
Fluke, J. D., Parry, C., Shapiro, P., Hollinshead, D., & Bollenbacher, V. (2002). The case on unsubstantiated cases. Policy & Practice, 60(3), 16–22.
Fontes, L. A., Cruz, M., & Tabachnick, J. (2001). Views of child sexual abuse in two cultural communities: An exploratory study among African Americans and Latinos. Child Maltreatment, 6, 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559501006002003.
Garcia, A., Aisenberg, E., & Harachi, T. (2012). Pathways to service inequalities among Latinos in the child welfare system. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(5), 1060–1071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.02.011.
Glenn, E. N. (1999). The social construction and institutionalization of gender and race: An integrative framework. In M. Ferree (Ed.), Revisioning gender (pp. 3–43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Graham, L. M., Lanier, P., Johnson-Motoyama, M. (2016). National profile of Latino/Latina children reported to the child welfare system for sexual abuse. Children and Youth Services Review, 66,18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.04.008
Harnois, C. (2009). Imagining a “feminist revolution:” Can multiracial feminisim revolutionize quantitative social science research? In M. T. Berger & K. Guidroz (Eds.), The intersectional approach: Transforming the academy through race, class, & gender (pp. 157–172). Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
Harnois, C. E., & Ifatunji, M. (2011). Gendered measures, gendered models: Toward an intersectional analysis of interpersonal racial discrimination. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(6), 1006–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.516836.
Hillberg, T., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C., & Dixon, L. (2011). Critical review of meta-analyses on the association between child sexual abuse and adult psychopathology. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 12(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838010386812.
Hussey, J. M., Marshall, J. M., English, D. J., Knight, E. D., Lau, A. S., Dubowitz, H., & Kotch, J. B. (2005). Defining maltreatment according to substantiation: Distinction without a difference? Child Abuse & Neglect, 29(5), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.12.005.
Hussey, J. M., Chang, J. J., & Kotch, J. B. (2006). Child maltreatment in the United States: Prevalence, risk factors, and adolescent health consequences. Pediatrics, 118(3), 933–942.
Johnson-Motoyama, M., Dettlaff, A. J., & Finno, M. (2012). Parental nativity and the decision to substantiate: Findings from a study of Latino children in the second National Survey of child and adolescent well-being (NSCAW II). Children and Youth Services Review, 34(11), 2229–2239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.07.017.
Kenny, M. C., & McEachern, A. G. (2000). Racial, ethnic, and cultural factors of childhood sexual abuse: A selected review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 20, 905–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00022-7.
Kim, H., Wildeman, C., Jonson-Reid, M., & Drake, B. (2017). Lifetime prevalence of investigating child maltreatment among US children. American Journal of Public Health, 107(2), 274–280.
Kohl, P. L., Jonson-Reid, M., & Drake, B. (2009). Time to leave substantiation behind findings from a national probability study. Child Maltreatment, 14(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559508326030.
Lanier, P., Maguire-Jack, K., Walsh, T., Drake, B., & Hubel, G. (2014). Race and ethnic differences in early childhood maltreatment in the United States. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 35(7), 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000083.
Lee, S., Lyvers, M., & Edwards, S. (2008). Childhood sexual abuse and substance abuse in relation to depression and coping. Journal of Substance Use, 13, 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659890802211077.
May, V. M. (2008). By a black woman of the south: Race, place, and gender in the work of Anna Julia Cooper. Southern Quarterly, 45(3), 127.
Morash, M., Bui, M., & Santiago, A. (2000). Gender specific ideology of domestic violence in Mexican origin families. International Review of Victimology, 1, 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/026975800000700305.
Murphey, D., Guzman, L., & Torres, A. (2014). America's Hispanic children: Gaining ground, looking forward. In Publication# 2014–38. Child: Trends.
Nadan, Y., Spilsbury, J. C., & Korbin, J. E. (2015). Culture and context in understanding child maltreatment: Contributions of intersectionality and neighborhood-based research. Child Abuse & Neglect, 41, 40–48.
National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect. (2018). Dataset details: National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) Child File, FFY 2012. Retrieved from https://www.ndacan.cornell.edu/datasets/dataset-details.cfm?ID=178.
Oregon Department of Health and Human Services. (2012). The Oregon Department of Human Services child welfare practices for cases with child sexual abuse. Salem, OR: Author. Retrieved from https://www.dhs.state.or.us/policy/childwelfare/manual_1/i-ab4att5.pdf.
Orloff, L., & Kelly, N. (1995). A look at the violence against women act and gender related asylum. Violence Against Women, 1, 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801295001004006.
Paine, M. L., & Hansen, D. J. (2002). Factors influencing children to self-disclose sexual abuse. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(2), 271–295.
Palusci, V. J., Cox, E. O., Cyrus, T. A., Heartwell, S. W., Vandervort, F. E., & Pott, E. S. (1999). Medical assessment and legal outcome in child sexual abuse. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 153(4), 388–392. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.153.4.388.
Sherwood, J. H. (2009). The view from the country club: Wealthy whites and the matrix of privilege. In M. T. Berger & K. Guidroz (Eds.), The intersectional approach: Transforming the academy through race, class, & gender (pp. 136–153). Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division. (2014). Annual estimates of the resident population by sex, age, race, and Hispanic origin for the United States and States: April 1, 2010 to July, 1, 2013 [Table]. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=bkmk.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) glossary (SDC and DCDC Combined). Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/ncands_glossary.pdf.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2002, 2002. Retrieved from). Child Maltreatment http://archive.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm02/cm02.pdf.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2013). National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) Child File: FFY 2012 [dataset]. Available from the National Data Archive on child abuse and neglect web site: http://www.ndacan.cornell.edu.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2015). Child Maltreatment 2013. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2017). Child Maltreatment 2015. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/research-data-technology/statistics-research/child-maltreatment.
Acknowledgements
Some of Laurie Graham’s time and effort for this research was supported by the Caroline H. and Thomas S. Royster Fellowship awarded by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. We acknowledge Diane Wyant for her feedback and edits of previous versions of this manuscript. The analyses presented in this publication were based on data from the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System (NCANDS) Child File, FFY 2012v1. These data were provided by the National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect at Cornell University and have been used with permission. The data were originally collected under the auspices of the Children’s Bureau. Funding was provided by the Children’s Bureau, Administration on Children, Youth, and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The collector of the original data, the funding agency, NDACAN, Cornell University, and the agents or employees of these institutions bear no responsibility for the analyses or interpretations presented here. The information and opinions expressed reflect solely the opinions of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Graham, L.M., Lanier, P., Finno-Velasquez, M. et al. Substantiated Reports of Sexual Abuse among Latinx Children: Multilevel Models of National Data. J Fam Viol 33, 481–490 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9967-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9967-2