Looking into the Day-To-Day Process of Victim Safety Planning

Abstract

Although safety planning is a widely recommended intervention for domestic violence and sexual assault victims, there has been limited research on the safety planning process, content, context or effectiveness. This study builds on prior research to increase the understanding of safety planning in every day practice through focus group discussions with domestic violence and sexual assault advocates from a variety of settings. Five focus groups with 37 participants from a variety of settings discussed typical safety planning strategies and addressing the complexity of safety in challenging situations. Six main themes emerged with regard to typical safety planning strategies. Additionally, discussions revealed there are no widely accepted protocols or evidence-based strategies regarding how to assess and handle common but risky situations. Lastly, results indicate that risks are multi-layered and impacted by resources available to victims as well as civil or criminal justice system procedures, policies and victim status. It is essential that evidence based best practices and protocols be developed for safety planning for a number of high risk situations along with ongoing training, supervision and support. Future research is needed to examine whether, and how, safety planning best practices and protocols should differ depending on agency setting or delivery mode (e.g., hotline, case management, counseling) and geographic context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ahrens, C. (2006). Being silenced: The impact of negative social reactions on the disclosure of rape. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-006-9069-9. 263–274.

  2. Allen, N., Larsen, S., Trotter, J., & Sullivan, C. (2013). Exploring the core services delivery processes of an evidence-based community advocacy program for women with abusive partners. Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arata, C. (1999). Coping with rape: The roles of prior sexual abuse and attribution of blame. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2014.864747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Black, M., Basile, K., Breiding, M., Smith, S., Walters, M., Merrick, M., Chen, J., & Stevens, M. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury and Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buzawa, E., Hotaling, G., Klein, A., & Byrne, J. (2000). Response to domestic violence in a pro-active court setting – Final report (128–129, 154–177). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.

  6. Bybee, D., & Sullivan, C. (2005). Predicting re-victimization of battered women 3 years after exiting a shelter program. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1/2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-005-6234-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell, J., Glass, N., Sharps, P., Laughon, K., & Bloom, T. (2007). Intimate partner homicide: review and implications of research and policy. Trauma, Abuse, & Neglect, 3, pp. 246–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838007303505.

  8. Cattaneo, L., & Goodman, L. (2015). What is empowerment anyway? A model for domestic violence practice, research, and evaluation. Psychology of Violence, 5(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Colvin, M., Pruett, J., Young, S., & Holosko, M. (2016). An exploratory case study of a sexual assault telephone hotline: training and practice. Violence Against Women, 23(8), 973–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Constantino, M., Glass, C., Arnkoff, D., Ametrano, R., & smith, J. (2011). Expectations. In J. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationship that work: Evidence-based responsiveness (2nd edn., pp. 354–376). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  11. Davies, J. (2009). Advocacy beyond leaving: Helping battered women in contact with current or former partners. San Francisco, CA: Family Violence Prevention Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davies, J., Lyon, E., & Monti-Catania, D. (1998). Safety planning with battered women: Complex lives/Difficult choices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dutton, M. (1992). Empowering and healing the battered woman. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Finn, J., Garner, M., & Wilson, J. (2011). Volunteer and user evaluation of the National Sexual Assault Online Hotline. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34, 266-272

  16. Goodkind, J., Sullivan, C., & Bybee, D. (2004). A contextual analysis of battered women’s safety planning. Violence Against Women, 10(5), 514–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goodman, L., Cattaneo, L., Thomas, K., Woulfe, J., Chong, S., & Smuth, K. (2015). Advancing domestic violence program evaluation: development and validation of the measure of victims empowerment related to safety (MOVERS). Psychology of Violence, 5(4), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Grupe, D., & Nitschke, J. (2013). Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: an integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 14, 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3524.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamby, S. (2014). Battered women’s protective strategies: Stronger than you know. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hamby, S., & Gray-Little, B. (2007). Can battered women cope? A critical analysis of research on women’s responses to violence. In K. Kendall-Tackett & S. Giacomoni (Eds.), Intimate Partner Violence (Civic Research Institute, Inc., pp. 28 – 1—28 – 15). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute, Inc.

  21. Hart, B. (2013). Risk assessment and safety planning (unpublished work).

  22. Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 9, 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.

  23. Kondracki, N., Wellman, N., & Amundson, D. (2002). Content analysis: review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. Journal of Nutritional Education and Behavior, 34(4), 224–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Krueger, R. (1998). Analyzing and reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  26. Kulkarni, S., Bell, H., Hartman, J., & Herman-Smith, R. (2013). Exploring individual and organizational factors contributing to compassion satisfaction, secondary traumatic stress, and burnout in domestic violence service providers. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 4, 2, 114–130. https://doi.org/10.5243/jsswr.2013.8.

  27. Kulkarni, S., Bell, H., & Rhodes, D. (2012). Back to basics: essential qualities of services for survivors of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 18(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801212437137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lachman, M., & Weaver, S. (1998). The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 763–773.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lane, E., Greenspan, R., & Weisburd, D. (2004). The second responders program: a coordinated police and social service response to domestic violence. In B. Fisher (Ed.), Violence against women and family violence: developments in research, practice, and policy (pp. III-2-1 – III-2-11).

  30. Lindhorst, T., Nurius, P., & Macy, R. (2005). Contextualized assessment with battered women: Strategic safety planning to cope with multiple harms. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(2), 331–352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Logan, T., & Walker, R. (2017a). The impact of stalking victimization on separation: assessing and addressing safety and economic security. Domestic Violence Report, 22(5), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Logan, T., & Walker, R. (2017b). Stalking: a multidimensional framework for assessment and safety planning. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse: A Review Journal, 18, 2, 200–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838015603210.

  33. Logan, T. & Walker, R. (2018a). Advocate safety planning feedback, training, and personal challenges. Journal of Family Violence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-017-9949-9.

  34. Logan, T. & Walker, R. (2018b). The gender safety gap: factors associated with personal risk assessment and safety responses. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517729405.

  35. Logan, T., Walker, R., Jordan, C., & Leukefeld, C. (2006). Women and victimization: Contributing factors, interventions, and implications. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lynch, K., & Logan, T. (2018). “You better say your prayers and get ready”: guns within the context of partner abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(4), 686–711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515613344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Macy, R., Giattina, M., Montijo, N., & Ermentrout, D. (2010). Domestic violence and sexual assault agency directors’ perspectives on services that help survivors. Violence Against Women, 16(10), 1138–1161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801210383085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Macy, R., Giattina, M., Parish, S., & Crosby, C. (2010). Domestic violence and sexual assault services: Historical concerns and contemporary challenges. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508329128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Macy, R., Giattina, M., Sangster, T., Crosby, C., & Montijo, N. (2009). Domestic violence and sexual assault services: inside the black box. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. McFarlane, J., Groff, J., O’Brien, J., & Watson, K. (2006). Secondary prevention of intimate partner violence: a randomized controlled trial. Nursing Research, 55(1), 52–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McFarlane, J., Soeken, K., & Wiist, W. (2000). An evaluation of interventions to decrease intimate partner violence to pregnant women. Public Health Nursing, 17(6), 443–451.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Murray, C., Horton, G., Johnson, C., Notestine, L., Garr, B., Pow, A., Flasch, P., & Doom, E. (2015). Domestic violence service providers’ perception of safety planning: a focus group study. Journal of Family Violence, 30, 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9674-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Patterson, C., Anderson, T., & Wei, C. (2014). Clients’ pretreatment role expectations, the therapeutic alliance, and clinical outcomes in outpatient therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70, 7, 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22054.

  44. Peled, E., Eisikovits, Z., Enosh, G., & Winstok, Z. (2000). Choice and empowerment for battered women who stay: toward a constructivist model. Social Work, 45(1), 9–25.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Petroski, E., Blair, J., Betz, C., Fowler, K., Jack, S., & Lyons, B. (2017). Racial and ethnic differences in homicides of adult women and the role of intimate partner violence—United States, 2003–2014. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66, 741–746. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6628a1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sorenson, S., & Wiebe, D. (2004). Weapons in the lives of battered women. American Journal Of Public Health, 94, 1412–1417.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Starzynski, L., Ullman, S., & Vasquez, A. (2017). Sexual assault survivors’ experiences with mental health professionals:” a qualitative study. Women & Therapy, 40(1–2), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2016.1213609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Stoddard, J., & Afari, N. (2014). A practitioner’s guide to experiential exercises and metaphors in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sullivan, C. (2011). Evaluating domestic violence support service programs: waste of time, necessary evil, or opportunity for growth? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.04.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Sullivan, C., & Bybee, D. (1999). Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(1), 43–53.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ullman, S. (2010). Talking about sexual assault: Society’s response to survivors. American Psychological Association: Washington, D.C.

  52. Weaver, T., Gilbert, L., El-Bassel, N., Resnick, H., & Noursi, S. (2015). Identifying and intervening with substance-using women exposed to intimate partner violence: phenomenology, comorbidities, and integrated approaches within primary care and other agency settings. Journal of Women’s Health, 24, 1, 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2014.4866.

  53. Weisz, A., Canales-Portalatin, D., & Nahan, N. (2001). An evaluation of victim advocacy within a team approach, final report. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Weisz, A., Canales-Portalatin, D., & Nahan, N. (2004). In B. Fisher (Ed.), Violence Against Women and Family Violence: Developments in Research, Practice, and Policy (pp. III-3-1 – III-3-8).

  55. Zweig, J., & Burt, M. (2007). Predicting women’s perceptions of domestic violence and sexual assault agency helpfulness: What matters to program clients? Violence Against Women, 13, 11, 1149–1178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801207307799.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the participants and the Department of Behavioral Science at the University of Kentucky for funding this research. The authors would also like to thank Jaime Miller for her help with analysis and editing.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to TK Logan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Logan, T., Walker, R. Looking into the Day-To-Day Process of Victim Safety Planning. J Fam Viol 33, 197–211 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-018-9951-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Safety Planning
  • Sexual Assault Victims
  • Gunther RE
  • Victim Resources
  • Partner Abuse