Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 197–211 | Cite as

Looking into the Day-To-Day Process of Victim Safety Planning

  • TK LoganEmail author
  • Robert Walker
Original Article


Although safety planning is a widely recommended intervention for domestic violence and sexual assault victims, there has been limited research on the safety planning process, content, context or effectiveness. This study builds on prior research to increase the understanding of safety planning in every day practice through focus group discussions with domestic violence and sexual assault advocates from a variety of settings. Five focus groups with 37 participants from a variety of settings discussed typical safety planning strategies and addressing the complexity of safety in challenging situations. Six main themes emerged with regard to typical safety planning strategies. Additionally, discussions revealed there are no widely accepted protocols or evidence-based strategies regarding how to assess and handle common but risky situations. Lastly, results indicate that risks are multi-layered and impacted by resources available to victims as well as civil or criminal justice system procedures, policies and victim status. It is essential that evidence based best practices and protocols be developed for safety planning for a number of high risk situations along with ongoing training, supervision and support. Future research is needed to examine whether, and how, safety planning best practices and protocols should differ depending on agency setting or delivery mode (e.g., hotline, case management, counseling) and geographic context.



The authors would like to thank the participants and the Department of Behavioral Science at the University of Kentucky for funding this research. The authors would also like to thank Jaime Miller for her help with analysis and editing.


  1. Ahrens, C. (2006). Being silenced: The impact of negative social reactions on the disclosure of rape. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 3–4. 263–274.
  2. Allen, N., Larsen, S., Trotter, J., & Sullivan, C. (2013). Exploring the core services delivery processes of an evidence-based community advocacy program for women with abusive partners. Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1), 1–18. Scholar
  3. Arata, C. (1999). Coping with rape: The roles of prior sexual abuse and attribution of blame. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(1), 62–78. Scholar
  4. Black, M., Basile, K., Breiding, M., Smith, S., Walters, M., Merrick, M., Chen, J., & Stevens, M. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury and Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  5. Buzawa, E., Hotaling, G., Klein, A., & Byrne, J. (2000). Response to domestic violence in a pro-active court setting – Final report (128–129, 154–177). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  6. Bybee, D., & Sullivan, C. (2005). Predicting re-victimization of battered women 3 years after exiting a shelter program. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36(1/2), 85–96. Scholar
  7. Campbell, J., Glass, N., Sharps, P., Laughon, K., & Bloom, T. (2007). Intimate partner homicide: review and implications of research and policy. Trauma, Abuse, & Neglect, 3, pp. 246–249.
  8. Cattaneo, L., & Goodman, L. (2015). What is empowerment anyway? A model for domestic violence practice, research, and evaluation. Psychology of Violence, 5(1), 84–94. Scholar
  9. Colvin, M., Pruett, J., Young, S., & Holosko, M. (2016). An exploratory case study of a sexual assault telephone hotline: training and practice. Violence Against Women, 23(8), 973–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Constantino, M., Glass, C., Arnkoff, D., Ametrano, R., & smith, J. (2011). Expectations. In J. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationship that work: Evidence-based responsiveness (2nd edn., pp. 354–376). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, J. (2009). Advocacy beyond leaving: Helping battered women in contact with current or former partners. San Francisco, CA: Family Violence Prevention Fund.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, J., Lyon, E., & Monti-Catania, D. (1998). Safety planning with battered women: Complex lives/Difficult choices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dutton, M. (1992). Empowering and healing the battered woman. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Finn, J., Garner, M., & Wilson, J. (2011). Volunteer and user evaluation of the National Sexual Assault Online Hotline. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34, 266-272Google Scholar
  16. Goodkind, J., Sullivan, C., & Bybee, D. (2004). A contextual analysis of battered women’s safety planning. Violence Against Women, 10(5), 514–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodman, L., Cattaneo, L., Thomas, K., Woulfe, J., Chong, S., & Smuth, K. (2015). Advancing domestic violence program evaluation: development and validation of the measure of victims empowerment related to safety (MOVERS). Psychology of Violence, 5(4), 355–366. Scholar
  18. Grupe, D., & Nitschke, J. (2013). Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: an integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 14, 488–501. Scholar
  19. Hamby, S. (2014). Battered women’s protective strategies: Stronger than you know. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hamby, S., & Gray-Little, B. (2007). Can battered women cope? A critical analysis of research on women’s responses to violence. In K. Kendall-Tackett & S. Giacomoni (Eds.), Intimate Partner Violence (Civic Research Institute, Inc., pp. 28 – 1—28 – 15). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
  21. Hart, B. (2013). Risk assessment and safety planning (unpublished work).Google Scholar
  22. Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 9, 1277–1288.
  23. Kondracki, N., Wellman, N., & Amundson, D. (2002). Content analysis: review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. Journal of Nutritional Education and Behavior, 34(4), 224–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krueger, R. (1998). Analyzing and reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Kulkarni, S., Bell, H., Hartman, J., & Herman-Smith, R. (2013). Exploring individual and organizational factors contributing to compassion satisfaction, secondary traumatic stress, and burnout in domestic violence service providers. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 4, 2, 114–130.
  27. Kulkarni, S., Bell, H., & Rhodes, D. (2012). Back to basics: essential qualities of services for survivors of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 18(1), 85–101. Scholar
  28. Lachman, M., & Weaver, S. (1998). The sense of control as a moderator of social class differences in health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 763–773.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lane, E., Greenspan, R., & Weisburd, D. (2004). The second responders program: a coordinated police and social service response to domestic violence. In B. Fisher (Ed.), Violence against women and family violence: developments in research, practice, and policy (pp. III-2-1 – III-2-11).Google Scholar
  30. Lindhorst, T., Nurius, P., & Macy, R. (2005). Contextualized assessment with battered women: Strategic safety planning to cope with multiple harms. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(2), 331–352.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Logan, T., & Walker, R. (2017a). The impact of stalking victimization on separation: assessing and addressing safety and economic security. Domestic Violence Report, 22(5), 69–74.Google Scholar
  32. Logan, T., & Walker, R. (2017b). Stalking: a multidimensional framework for assessment and safety planning. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse: A Review Journal, 18, 2, 200–222.
  33. Logan, T. & Walker, R. (2018a). Advocate safety planning feedback, training, and personal challenges. Journal of Family Violence.
  34. Logan, T. & Walker, R. (2018b). The gender safety gap: factors associated with personal risk assessment and safety responses. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
  35. Logan, T., Walker, R., Jordan, C., & Leukefeld, C. (2006). Women and victimization: Contributing factors, interventions, and implications. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lynch, K., & Logan, T. (2018). “You better say your prayers and get ready”: guns within the context of partner abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(4), 686–711. Scholar
  37. Macy, R., Giattina, M., Montijo, N., & Ermentrout, D. (2010). Domestic violence and sexual assault agency directors’ perspectives on services that help survivors. Violence Against Women, 16(10), 1138–1161. Scholar
  38. Macy, R., Giattina, M., Parish, S., & Crosby, C. (2010). Domestic violence and sexual assault services: Historical concerns and contemporary challenges. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(1), 3–32. Scholar
  39. Macy, R., Giattina, M., Sangster, T., Crosby, C., & Montijo, N. (2009). Domestic violence and sexual assault services: inside the black box. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 359–373. Scholar
  40. McFarlane, J., Groff, J., O’Brien, J., & Watson, K. (2006). Secondary prevention of intimate partner violence: a randomized controlled trial. Nursing Research, 55(1), 52–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. McFarlane, J., Soeken, K., & Wiist, W. (2000). An evaluation of interventions to decrease intimate partner violence to pregnant women. Public Health Nursing, 17(6), 443–451.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Murray, C., Horton, G., Johnson, C., Notestine, L., Garr, B., Pow, A., Flasch, P., & Doom, E. (2015). Domestic violence service providers’ perception of safety planning: a focus group study. Journal of Family Violence, 30, 381–392. Scholar
  43. Patterson, C., Anderson, T., & Wei, C. (2014). Clients’ pretreatment role expectations, the therapeutic alliance, and clinical outcomes in outpatient therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70, 7, 673–680.
  44. Peled, E., Eisikovits, Z., Enosh, G., & Winstok, Z. (2000). Choice and empowerment for battered women who stay: toward a constructivist model. Social Work, 45(1), 9–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Petroski, E., Blair, J., Betz, C., Fowler, K., Jack, S., & Lyons, B. (2017). Racial and ethnic differences in homicides of adult women and the role of intimate partner violence—United States, 2003–2014. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66, 741–746. Scholar
  46. Sorenson, S., & Wiebe, D. (2004). Weapons in the lives of battered women. American Journal Of Public Health, 94, 1412–1417.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Starzynski, L., Ullman, S., & Vasquez, A. (2017). Sexual assault survivors’ experiences with mental health professionals:” a qualitative study. Women & Therapy, 40(1–2), 228–246. Scholar
  48. Stoddard, J., & Afari, N. (2014). A practitioner’s guide to experiential exercises and metaphors in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  49. Sullivan, C. (2011). Evaluating domestic violence support service programs: waste of time, necessary evil, or opportunity for growth? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 354–360. Scholar
  50. Sullivan, C., & Bybee, D. (1999). Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(1), 43–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Ullman, S. (2010). Talking about sexual assault: Society’s response to survivors. American Psychological Association: Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  52. Weaver, T., Gilbert, L., El-Bassel, N., Resnick, H., & Noursi, S. (2015). Identifying and intervening with substance-using women exposed to intimate partner violence: phenomenology, comorbidities, and integrated approaches within primary care and other agency settings. Journal of Women’s Health, 24, 1, 51–56.
  53. Weisz, A., Canales-Portalatin, D., & Nahan, N. (2001). An evaluation of victim advocacy within a team approach, final report. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  54. Weisz, A., Canales-Portalatin, D., & Nahan, N. (2004). In B. Fisher (Ed.), Violence Against Women and Family Violence: Developments in Research, Practice, and Policy (pp. III-3-1 – III-3-8).Google Scholar
  55. Zweig, J., & Burt, M. (2007). Predicting women’s perceptions of domestic violence and sexual assault agency helpfulness: What matters to program clients? Violence Against Women, 13, 11, 1149–1178.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Department of Behavioral ScienceUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations