Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Displayed Affective Behavior between Intimate Partner Violence Types during Non-Violent Conflict Discussions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little is known about how situationally violent (SV) couples differ from both characterologically violent (CV) and distressed, non-violent (DNV) couples in terms of their displayed affective behaviors during conflict. This study addressed this question by conducting secondary data analysis of two datasets (Jacobson and Gottman 1998 and Bradley et al. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 10(2), 97–116, 2011), examining displayed affective behaviors among these groups. We hypothesized that the SV group would present a midpoint of affect between the other two groups, displaying more negative behaviors than the DNV group, but less than the CV group (and vice versus for positive behaviors). A MANOVA was utilized to compare displayed affective behaviors coded from observational analysis of a conflict discussion. Results show that the SV group displayed more positive and less negative affective behaviors than CV group. Few differences were seen between the SV and DNV groups. This suggests that these two groups are similar in terms of their displayed affective behaviors during conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Bograd, M., & Mederos, F. (1999). Battering and couples therapy: Universal screening and selection of treatment modality. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25, 291–312. doi:10.1111/j.1752–0606.1999.tb00249.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, K. (2010). Screening couples for intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 21(1), 76–82. doi:10.1080/08975351003618650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. P. C., & Gottman, J. M. (2012). Reducing situational violence in Low-Income couples by fostering healthy relationships. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(s1), 187–198. doi:10.1111/j.1752–0606.2012.00288.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. P. C., Friend, D. J., & Gottman, J. M. (2011). Supporting healthy relationships in low-income, violent couples: Reducing conflict and strengthening relationship skills and satisfaction. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 10(2), 97–116. doi:10.1080/15332691.2011.562808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. G., & Jones, K. D. (2010). Continuum of conflict and control: A conceptualization of intimate partner violence typologies. The Family Journal, 18(3), 248–254. doi:10.1177/1066480710371795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coan, J. A., & Gottman, J. M. (2007). The specific affect coding system (SPAFF). Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 267–285) Oxford University Press, USA.

  • Coan, J., Gottman, J. M., Babcock, J., & Jacobson, N. (1997). Battering and the male rejection of influence from women. Aggressive Behavior, 23(5), 375–388. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098–2337(1997)23:5 < 375::AID-AB6 > 3.0.CO;2-H.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1978). The facial action coding system. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

  • Ferraro, K. (2013). Gender matters in intimate partner violence. In B. L. Russell (Ed.), (pp. 133–149) Springer New York. doi:10.1007/978–1–4614-5871-5_9

  • Friend, D. J., Bradley, R. P. C., Thatcher, R., & Gottman, J. M. (2011). Typologies of intimate partner violence: Evaluation of a screening instrument for differentiation. Journal of Family Violence, 26(7), 551–563. doi:10.1007/s10896–011–9392-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M. (1993). A theory of marital dissolution and stability. Journal of Family Psychology, 7(1), –57. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.7.1.57.

  • Gottman, J. M. (1999). The marriage clinic: A scientifically-based marital therapy. New York, New York: WW Norton & Company.

  • Gottman, J. M. (2014). What predicts divorce?: The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. New York. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 221. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.63.2.221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J.M., Notarius, C., Markman, H., & Mettetel, G. (1977). Codebook for the CISS. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.

  • Gottman, J. M., Jacobson, N. S., Rushe, R. H., & Shortt, J. W. (1995). The relationship between heart rate reactivity, emotionally aggressive behavior, and general violence in batterers. Journal of Family Psychology, 9(3), 227. doi:10.1037/0893–3200.9.3.227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(1), 5–22. doi:10.2307/353438.

  • Gottman, J. M. (2002) The mathematics of marriage: Dynamic nonlinear models. Cambridge, MIT Press

  • Gottman, J. M., Swanson, C., & Swanson, K. (2002). A general systems theory of marriage: Nonlinear difference equation modeling of marital interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(4), 326–340. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0604_07.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 476. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.116.3.476.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (1998). When men batter women: New insights into ending abusive relationships. New York, New York: Simon and Schuster.

  • Jacobson, N. S., Gottman, J. M., Waltz, J., Rushe, R., Babcock, J., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1994). Affect, verbal content, and psychophysiology in the arguments of couples with a violent husband. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(5), 982. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.62.5.982.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(2), 283–294. doi:10.2307/353683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (2001). Conflict and control: Symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. In A. Booth, A. C. Crouter, & M. Clements (Eds.), Couples in conflict (pp. 95–104). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum

  • Johnson, M. P. (2006a). Violence and abuse in personal relationships: Conflict, terror, and resistance in intimate partnerships. The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 557–576). New York, New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Johnson, M. P. (2006b). Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 12(11), 1003–1018. doi:10.1177/1077801206293328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 948–963. doi:10.1111/j.1741–3737.2000.00948.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P., & Leone, J. M. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence findings from the national violence against women survey. Journal of Family Issues, 26(3), 322–349. doi:10.1177/0192513X04270345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: Research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46(3), 476–499. doi:10.1111/j.1744–1617.2008.00215.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leone, J. M., Johnson, M. P., & Cohan, C. L. (2007). Victim help seeking: Differences between intimate terrorism and situational couple violence. Family Relations, 56(5), 427–439. doi:10.1111/j.1741–3729.2007.00471.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1990). Power and control: Tactics of men who batter: An educational curriculum. Minnesota Program Development Incorporated.

  • Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York: Springer Publishing Company.

  • Simpson, L. E., Doss, B. D., Wheeler, J., & Christensen, A. (2007). Relationship violence among couples seeking therapy: Common couple violence or battering? Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(2), 270–283. doi:10.1111/j.1752–0606.2007.00021.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, L. E., Atkins, D. C., Gattis, K. S., & Christensen, A. (2008). Low-level relationship aggression and couple therapy outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(1), 102. doi:10.1037/0893–3200.22.1.102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stith, S. M., Rosen, K. H., McCollum, E. E., & Thomsen, C. J. (2004). Treating intimate partner violence within intact couple relationships: Outcomes of multi-couple versus individual couple therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30(3), 305–318. doi:10.1111/j.1752–0606.2004.tb01242.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stith, S. M., Amanor-Boadu, Y., Strachman Miller, M., Menhusen, E., Morgan, C., & Few-Demo, A. (2011). Vulnerabilities, stressors, and adaptations in situationally violent relationships. Family Relations, 60(1), 73–89. doi:10.1111/j.1741–3729.2010.00634.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stith, S. M., McCollum, E. E., Amanor-Boadu, Y., & Smith, D. (2012). Systemic perspectives on intimate partner violence treatment. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38(1), 220–240. doi:10.1111/j.1752–0606.2011.00245.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todahl, J. L., Linville, D., Chou, L., & Maher-Cosenza, P. (2008). A qualitative study of intimate partner violence universal screening by family therapy interns: Implications for practice, research, training, and supervision. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 34(1), 28–43. doi:10.1111/j.1752–0606.2008.00051.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tweed, R. G., & Dutton, D. G. (1998). A comparison of impulsive and instrumental subgroups of batterers. Violence and Victims, 13(3), 217–230.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, J., Babcock, J. C., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M. (2000). Testing a typology of batterers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 658. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.4.658.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. Friend.

Ethics declarations

Grants

A portion of this study was supported by a grant (#90OJ2022) from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families (ACF). The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ACF.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Friend, D.J., Bradley, R.P.C. & Gottman, J.M. Displayed Affective Behavior between Intimate Partner Violence Types during Non-Violent Conflict Discussions. J Fam Viol 32, 493–504 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9870-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9870-7

Keywords

Navigation