Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 215–225 | Cite as

IPV Stigma and its Social Management: The Roles of Relationship-Type, Abuse-Type, and Victims’ Sex

Original Article

Abstract

Victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) often encounter negative societal reactions to their abuse. A quantitative self-report study examined the existence of these potential identity-threats to former IPV victims (N = 345, n = 106 males, n = 239 females). Biological sex, abuse type (i.e., psychological, physical) and severity, and IPV relationship type (i.e., situational couple violence, intimate terrorism) were each modeled as predictors of IPV stigma and its social management strategies. Results indicated differences in how IPV stigma was experienced and communicatively managed by diverse victims. Findings, interpreted through an applied lens for IPV practitioners and victims, also add nuance to existing theories of IPV, interpersonal communication, and social stigma.

Keywords

Stigma Identity management Situational couple violence Intimate terrorism 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks dissertation committee members Drs. Leanne Knobloch (advisor), Jennifer Hardesty, John Caughlin, and Dale Brashers for their feedback early on in the process. A previous version of this paper was presented at the 2010 Central States Communication Association conference, Cincinnati, OH.

References

  1. Afifi, T., & Steuber, K. (2009). The revelation risk model (RRM): factors that predict the revelation of secrets and the strategies used to reveal them. Communication Monographs, 76(2), 144–176. doi: 10.1080/03637750902828412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Alhabib, S., Nur, U., & Jones, R. (2010). Domestic violence against women: systematic review of prevalence studies. Journal of Family Violence, 25(4), 369–382. doi: 10.1007/s10896-009-9298-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, K. L. (2008). Is partner violence worse in the context of control? Journal of Marriage and Family, 70(5), 1157–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00557.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger, B. E., Ferrans, C. E., & Lashley, F. R. (2001). Measuring stigma in people with HIV: psychometric assessment of the HIV Stigma Scale. Research in Nursing and Health, 24(6), 518–529. doi: 10.1002/nur.10011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brashers, D. E., Haas, S. M., Neidig, J. L., & Rintamaki, L. S. (2002). Social activism, self-advocacy, and coping with HIV illness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(1), 113–133. doi: 10.1177/0265407502191006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, J., Jones, A. S., Dienemann, J., Kub, J., Schollenberger, J., O’Campo, P., et al. (2002). Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 1157–1163.Google Scholar
  10. Coker, A., Davis, K., Arias, I., Desai, S., Sanderson, M., Brandt, H., et al. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(4), 260–268. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00514-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daigle, L. E., & Mummert, S. J. (2014). Sex-role identification and violent victimization: gender differences in the role of masculinity. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(2), 255–278. doi: 10.1177/0886260513505148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deaux, K. (1993). Reconstructing social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(1), 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeHart, D., Follingstad, D., & Fields, A. (2010). Does context matter in determining psychological abuse?: Effects of pattern, harm, relationship, and norms. Journal of Family Violence, 25(5), 461–474. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9307-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1978). Wives: the “appropriate” victims of marital violence. Victimology, 2(3–4), 426–442.Google Scholar
  15. Eckstein, J. (2009). Exploring communication of men revealing abuse from female romantic partners. In D. Cahn (Ed.), Family violence: Communication processes (pp. 89–111). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  16. Eckstein, J. (2010). Masculinity of men communicating abuse victimization. Culture, Society, and Masculinities, 2(1), 62–74. doi: 10.3149/csm.0201.62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eckstein, J. J. (2011). Reasons for staying in intimately violent relationships: comparisons of men and women and messages communicated to self and others. Journal of Family Violence, 26, 21–30. doi: 10.1007/s10896-010-9338-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: flexible statistical power analysis program for social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Ridder, E. M. (2005). Partner violence and mental health outcomes in a New Zealand birth cohort. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1103–1119. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00202.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frable, D. E. S., Platt, L., & Hoey, S. (1998). Concealable stigmas and positive self-perceptions: feeling better around similar others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 909–922.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186–192.Google Scholar
  22. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  24. Hertzog, J., & Rowley, R. (2014). My beliefs of my peers’ beliefs: exploring the gendered nature of social norms in adolescent romantic relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(2), 348–368. doi: 10.1177/0886260513505145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hines, D. A., & Malley-Morrison, K. (2001). Psychological effects of partner abuse against men: a neglected research area. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 2(2), 75–85. doi: 10.1037/1524-9220.2.2.75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Smutzler, N., & Stuart, G. L. (1998). Demand and withdraw communication among couples experiencing husband violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(5), 731–743.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hudson, W. W. (1997). The WALMYR assessment scales scoring manual. Tallahassee: WALMYR.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(2), 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson, M. P. (2008). A typology of domestic violence: Intimate terrorism, violent resistance, and situational couple violence. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, M. P. (2011). Gender and types of intimate partner violence: a response to an anti-feminist literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(4), 289–296. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2011.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaplowitz, M. D., Lupi, F., Couper, M. P., & Thorp, L. (2012). The effect of invitation design on web survey response rates. Social Science Computer Review, 30(3), 339–349. doi: 10.1177/0894439311419084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kessler, R. C., Molnar, B. E., Feurer, I. D., & Appelbaum, M. (2001). Patterns and mental health predictors of domestic violence in the United States: results from the national comorbidity survey. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 24(4–5), 487–508.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2010). Controversies involving gender and intimate partner violence in the United States. Sex Roles, 62(3–4), 179–193. doi: 10.1007/s11199-009-9628-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leone, J. M., Johnson, M. P., & Cohan, C. L. (2007). Victim help seeking: differences between intimate terrorism and situational couple violence. Family Relations, 56(5), 427–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00471.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2001). Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 363–385. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Link, B. G., Mirotznik, J., & Cullen, F. T. (1991). The effectiveness of stigma coping orientations: can negative consequences of mental illness labeling be avoided? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32(3), 302–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Litman, L. C. (2003). Dependent personality disorder as a marker of “battered husband syndrome”: A case exemplar. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 48(11), 772–773.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Loseke, D. R., & Cahill, S. E. (1984). The social construction of deviance: experts on battered women. Social Problems, 31(3), 296–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Major, B., & O’Brien, L. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 393–421. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McFarlane, J., Soeken, K., & Wiist, W. (2000). An evaluation of interventions to decrease intimate partner violence to pregnant women. Public Health Nursing, 17(6), 443–451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Menon, G. (1994). Judgments of behavioral frequencies: Memory search and retrieval strategies. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports (pp. 161–172). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mill, J., Edwards, N., Jackson, R., MacLean, L., & Chaw-Kant, J. (2010). Stigmatization as social control mechanism for persons living with HIV-AIDS. Qualitative Health Research, 20(11), 1469–1483. doi: 10.1177/1049732310375436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peralta, R. L., & Fleming, M. F. (2003). Screening for intimate partner violence in a primary care setting: the validity of “feeling safe at home” and prevalence results. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 16(6), 525–532. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.16.6.525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Romesburg, H. C. (1984). Cluster analysis for researchers. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  46. Schur, E. (1980). The politics of deviance: Stigma contests and the uses of power. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  47. Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1990). Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  48. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., & Warren, W. L. (2003). The conflict tactics scales handbook: Revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2), CTS: Parent–child version (CTSPC). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  49. Sullivan, C. M., & Bybee, D. I. (1999). Reducing violence using community-based advocacy for women with abusive partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(1), 43–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sullivan, T. P., Schroeder, J. A., Dudley, D. N., & Dixon, J. M. (2010). Do differing types of victimization and coping strategies influence the type of social reactions experienced by current victims of intimate partner violence? Violence Against Women, 16(6), 638–657. doi: 10.1177/1077801210370027.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tang, C. S., Wong, D., & Cheung, F. M. (2002). Social construction of women as legitimate victims of violence in Chinese societies. Violence Against Women, 8(8), 968–996. doi: 10.1177/107780102400447096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. (NCJ-183781). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Retrieved from www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/183781.pdf
  53. Walker, L. E. A. (2000). The battered woman syndrome (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Watters, J. K., & Biernacki, P. (1989). Targeted sampling: options for the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 36(4), 416–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Communication DepartmentWestern Connecticut State UniversityDanburyUSA

Personalised recommendations