Relationship Dynamics, Gender, and Criminal Offending in Fragile Families

Abstract

Using data collected from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, this study investigated the links between intimate partners’ relationship dynamics and criminal offending in “fragile families.” We assessed the mechanisms underlying relationships among parents with young children from the perspective of three dominant theories in the field of criminology (i.e., strain, social control/bonding, and social learning theories), as well as the potential moderating effects of gender. In this study, criminal offending is operationalized as whether the respondents have been formally “booked or charged with breaking a law” since the last data collection period. Overall, our study lends some support for all three theories, but we found little evidence that the relationships among our substantive predictor variables and formal contact with the criminal justice system differed by gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    By marrying up, we mean their likelihood of finding someone who exhibits fewer behavioral challenges or troubles with the law.

  2. 2.

    Although self-report surveys can suffer from underreporting/social desirability issues, they are the most commonly used methods of data collection in the field of criminology — particularly for theory-testing. Research comparing the reliability and validity of self-report to official records of arrests indicates good reliability and strong concurrent validity (see Maxfield et al. 2000).

  3. 3.

    The survey did not ask about what the specific charges entailed.

  4. 4.

    According to Comrey and Lee (1992), loadings in excess of .63 (40 % overlapping variance) are considered “very good;” while those which exceed .55 (30 % overlapping variance) are deemed to be “good.” Additionally, this measure has also been tested in Paat (2011).

  5. 5.

    Baseline education is a 7-category continuous variable with response categories ranging from “no formal schooling” to “graduate or professional school.”

  6. 6.

    Since the rate of criminal involvement seems to peak among young people and declines with age increment, we tested the need to model the age variable as a quadratic term using a residual plot. Further examination of its quadratic fit indicated that this concern was not substantiated.

References

  1. Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agnew, R. (1997). Stability and change in crime over the life course: A strain theory explanation. In T. P. Thornberry (Ed.), Developmental theories of crime and delinquency: Advances in criminological theory (pp. 101–132). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agnew, R. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Criminology, 38, 319–361. doi:10.1177/0022427801038004001

  4. Agnew, R. (2002). Experienced, vicarious, and anticipated strain: An exploratory study on physical victimization and delinquency. Justice Quarterly, 19, 603–632. doi:10.1080/07418820200095371

  5. Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Agnew, R. (2009a). General strain theory. In M. D. Krohn, A. J. Lizotte, & G. P. Hall (Eds.), Handbook on crime and deviance, handbooks of sociology and social research (pp. 169–185). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Agnew, R. (2009b). General strain theory: Current status and directions for future research. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 101–126). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aikins, J. W., Simon, V. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2010). Romantic partner selection and socialization of young adolescents’ substance use and behavior problems. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 813–826. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.07.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Akers, R. L. (1985). Deviant behavior: A social learning approach (3rd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Akers, R. L. (2009). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Amato, P. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1269–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Amato, P. R., & Cheadle, J. E. (2008). Parental divorce, marital conflict and children’s behavior problems: A comparison of adopted and biological children. Social Forces, 86, 1139–1161.

  14. Bartolac, A., Kamenov, Z., & Petrak, O. (2011). Gender differences in family roles, satisfaction and perception of fairness with regard to the traditionality of gender attitudes. Croatian Journal of Social Policy, 18, 175–194. doi:10.3935/rsp.v18i2.998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169–217.

  16. Belknap, J., & Holsinger, K. (2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1, 48–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Booth, A., Johnson, D., & Edwards, J. N. (1983). Measuring marital instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 387–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brame, R., Paternoster, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Testing for the equality of maximum-likelihood regression coefficients between two independent equations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 245–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Broidy, L., & Agnew, R. (1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 275–306.

  20. Brown, B. B., & Bakken, J. P. (2011). Parenting and peer relationships: Reinvigorating research on family–peer linkages in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 153–165. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00720.x.

  21. Buehler, C., & Gerard, J. M. (2002). Marital conflict, ineffective parenting, and children’s and adolescents’ maladjustment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 78–92. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00078.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Burgess, R. L., & Akers, R. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14, 128–147.

  23. Capaldi, D. M., Kim, H. K., & Owen, L. D. (2008). Romantic partners’ influence on men’s likelihood of arrest in early adulthood. Criminology, 46, 267–299. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00110.x.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, X. (2009). The link between juvenile offending and victimization: The influence of risky lifestyles, social bonding, and individual characteristics. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7, 119–135. doi:10.1177/1541204008328799.

  25. Cherlin, A. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cochran, J. K., Sellers, C., Wiesbrockb, V., & Palaciosa, W. R. (2011). Repetitive intimate partner victimization: An exploratory application of social learning theory. Deviant Behavior, 32, 790–817. doi:10.1080/01639625.2010.538342.

  27. Cohen, P., Cohen, J., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mehwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Comrey, A., & Lee, H. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Conry-Murray, C. (2009). Adolescent and adult reasoning about gender and fairness in traditional practices in Benin, West Africa. Social Development, 18, 427–446. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00462.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dallaire, D. H. (2007). Incarcerated mothers and fathers: A comparison of risks for children and families. Family Relations, 56, 440–453. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00472.x.

  31. De Coster, S., & Zito, R. C. (2010). Gender and general strain theory: The gendering of emotional experiences and expressions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26, 224–245. doi:10.1177/1043986209359853.

  32. DeMaris, A., & Swinford, S. (1996). Female victims of spousal violence: Factors influencing their level of fearfulness. Family Relations, 45, 98–106.

  33. Edin, K. (2000). What do low-income single mothers say about marriage? Social Problems, 47, 112–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Eitle, D., & Turner, R. J. (2002). Exposure to community violence and young adult crime: The effects of witnessing violence, traumatic victimization, and other stressful life events. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 214–237. doi:10.1177/002242780203900204.

  35. Farrell, A. D., Henry, D. B., & Mays, S. A. (2011). Parents as moderators of the impact of school norms and peer influences on aggression in middle school students. Child Development, 82, 146–161. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01546.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Farrington, D. P., Jolliffe, D., Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Hill, K. G., & Kosterman, R. (2009). Why are boys more likely to be referred to juvenile court? Gender differences in official and self-reported delinquency. Victims & Offenders: An International Journal of Evidence-based Research, Policy, and Practice, 5, 25–44. doi:10.1080/15564880903422963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. (1999). The effect of household wealth on educational attainment: Evidence from 35 countries. Population and Development Review, 25, 85–120.

  38. Fischer, A., & Evers, C. (2011). The social costs and benefits of anger as a function of gender and relationship context. Sex Roles, 65, 23–34. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9956-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fleming, C. B., White, H. R., & Catalano, R. F. (2010). Romantic relationships and substance use in early adulthood: An examination of the influences of relationship type, partner substance use, and relationship quality. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51, 153–167. doi:10.1177/0022146510368930.

  40. Geller, A., Garfinkel, I., Cooper, C. E., & Mincy, R. B. (2009). Parental incarceration and child well-being: Implications for urban families. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 1186–1202. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00653.x.

  41. Giordano, P. C., Seffrin, P. M., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2011). Parenthood and crime: The role of wantedness, relationships with partners, and ses. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 405–416. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.05.006.

  42. Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  44. Hoeve, M., Blokland, A., Dubas, J. S., Loeber, R., Gerris, J. R. M., & van der Laan, P. H. (2008). Trajectories of delinquency and parenting styles. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 223–235. doi:10.1007/s10802-007-9172-x.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hope, T. L., Wilder, E. I., & Watt, T. T. (2003). The relationships among adolescent pregnancy, pregnancy resolution, and juvenile delinquency. The Sociological Quarterly, 44, 555–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jackson, E. J. (2003). A user’s guide to principal components. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Johnson, W., Giordano, P. C., & Manning, W. D. (2011). Parent–child relations and offending during young adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 786–799. doi:10.1007/s10964-010-9591-9.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kaplan, H. B., & Lin, C.-H. (2005). Deviant identity, negative self-feelings, and decreases in deviant behavior: The moderating influence of conventional social bonding. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11, 289–303. doi:10.1080/10683160412331294817.

  49. Karriker-Jaffe, K. J., Foshee, V. A., & Ennett, S. T. (2011). Examining how neighborhood disadvantage influences trajectories of adolescent violence: A look at social bonding and psychological distress. Journal of School Health, 81, 764–773. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00656.x.

  50. Katz, R. S. (2000). Explaining girls’ and women’s crime and desistance in the context of their victimization experiences: A developmental test of revised strain theory and the life course perspective. Violence Against Women, 6, 633–660. doi:10.1177/1077801200006006005.

  51. Kreager, D. A., Matsueda, R. L., & Erosheva, E. A. (2010). Motherhood and criminal desistance in disadvantaged neighborhoods. Criminology, 48, 221–258. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00184.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Krumrei, E. J., Mahoney, A., & Pargament, K. I. (2011). Demonization of divorce: Prevalence rates and links to postdivorce adjustment. Family Relations, 60, 90–103. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00635.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lauritsen, J. L., Heimer, K., & Lynch, J. P. (2009). Trends in the gender gap in violent offending: New evidence from the national crime victimization survey. Criminology, 47, 361–399.

  55. Leverentz, A. M. (2006). The love of a good man? Romantic relationships as a source of support or hindrance for female ex-offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 43, 459–488. doi:10.1177/0022427806293323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Long, S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variable. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Manning, R. (2011). Punishing the innocent: Children of incarcerated and detained parents. Criminal Justice Ethics, 30, 267–287. doi:10.1080/0731129X.2011.628830.

  58. Maxfield, G., Weiler, B. L., & Widom, C. P. (2000). Comparing self-reports and official records of arrests. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. McDonald, R., Jouriles, E. N., Rosenfield, D., & Corbitt-Shindler, D. (2011). Predictors of domestically violent men’s aggression toward children: A prospective study. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 11–18. doi:10.1037/a0022449.

  60. Menard, S., & Grotpeter, J. K. (2011). Peer influence, social bonding, physical and relational aggression: Perpetration and victimization in an elementary school sample. Victims & Offenders: An International Journal of Evidence-based Research, Policy, and Practice, 6, 181–206. doi:10.1080/15564886.2011.557326.

  61. Miller, S., Loeber, R., & Hipwell, A. (2009). Peer deviance, parenting and disruptive behavior among young girls. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 139–152. doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9265-1.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Mulder, E., Brand, E., Bullens, R., & van Marle, H. (2010). Risk factors for overall recidivism and severity of recidivism in serious juvenile offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 118–135. doi:10.1177/0306624X09356683.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Murray, J., & Farrington, D. P. (2008). The effects of parental imprisonment on children. Crime and Justice, 37, 133–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Murray, J., Loeber, R., & Pardini, D. (2012). Parental involvement in the criminal justice system and the development of youth theft, marijuana use, depression, and poor academic performance. Criminology, 50, 255–302. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00257.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ngo, F. T., & Paternoster, R. (2012). Stalking strain, concurrent negative emotions, and legitimate coping strategies: A preliminary test of gendered strain theory. Journal American Journal of Criminal Justice. doi:10.1007/s12103-012-9179-x.

  66. Palmer, E. J., & Gough, K. (2007). Childhood experiences of parenting and causal attributions for criminal behavior among young offenders and non-offenders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 790–806. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00186.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Paat, Y-F. (2011). The link between financial strain, interparental discord and children’s antisocial behaviors. Journal of Family Violence, 26, 195–210. doi:10.1007/s10896-010-9354-0

  68. Piquero, N. L., Fox, K., Piquero, A. R., Capowich, G., & Mazerolle, P. (2010). Gender, general strain theory, negative emotions, and disordered eating. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 380–392. doi:10.1007/s10964-009-9466-0.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Poehlmann, J., Dallaire, D., Loer, A. B., & Shear, L. D. (2010). Children’s contact with their incarcerated parents: Research findings and recommendations. American Psychologist, 65, 575–598. doi:10.1037/a0020279.

  70. Reichman, N. E., Teitler, J. O., Garfinkel, I., & McLanahan, S. S. (2001). Fragile families: Sample and design. Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 303–326. doi:10.1016/S0190-7409(01)00141-4.

  71. Salzinger, S., Feldman, R. S., Rosario, M., & Ng-Mak, D. S. (2011). Role of parent and peer relationships and individual characteristics in middle school children’s behavioral outcomes in the face of community violence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 395–407. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00677.x.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Samek, D., & Rueter, M. A. (2011). Considerations of elder sibling closeness in predicting younger sibling substance use: Social learning versus social bonding explanations. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 931–941. doi:10.1037/a0025857.

  73. Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Stanley, S. M., & Markman, H. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 595–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Stevens-Watkins, D., & Graves, S. L. (2011). Risk and protective factors among African American adolescent males that predict adult involvement in the criminal justice system: Evidence from a national sample. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 9, 136–151. doi:10.1080/15377938.2011.566816.

  76. Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Sweet, J. A., & Bumpass, L. L. (1996). The national survey of families and households - waves 1 and 2: Data description and documentation [Data file and code book]. Retrieved from http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/nsfh/home.htm.

  78. Umberson, D., Anderson, K. L., Williams, K., & Chen, M. D. (2003). Relationship dynamics, emotion state, and domestic violence: A stress and masculinities perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 233–247.

  79. Wildeman, C., & Western, B. (2010). Incarceration in fragile families. The Future of Children, 20, 157–177.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Williams, F. P., & McShane, M. D. (2010). Criminological theory (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Yu, T., Pettit, G. S., Lansford, J. E., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (2010). The interactive effects of marital conflict and divorce on parent – adult children’s relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 282–292. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00699.x.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Zoutewelle-Terovan, M., van der Geest, V., Liefbroer, A., & Bijleveld, C. (2012). Criminality and family formation: Effects of marriage and parenthood on criminal behavior for men and women. Crime & Delinquency. doi:10.1177/0011128712441745.

  83. Zullig, K. J., Young, M., & Hussain, M. (2010). Distinguishing between positive and negative social bonding in problem drinking among college students. American Journal of Health Education, 41, 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yok-Fong Paat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paat, YF., Hope, T.L. Relationship Dynamics, Gender, and Criminal Offending in Fragile Families. J Fam Viol 30, 227–241 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9666-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Relationship dynamics
  • Fragile families
  • Gender
  • Criminal offending