Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Voices from the Group: Violent Women’s Experiences of Intervention

  • CULTURAL FACTORS IN INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study discusses the experiences of women who participated in a program for partner-violent women by understanding their views of the treatment process, outcomes and the meanings they attached to it. This study followed a Husserlian descriptive phenomenology. Interviews were conducted with seven English women who used physical intimate partner violence in heterosexual relationships. The data were analyzed using by the method developed by Colaizzi (1978). The qualitative findings suggest the women experienced the treatment as positive and meaningful and experienced personal transformations. Deeper analysis of the data, showed that there were two key areas of benefit to the women, one involving the connections and bonds formed with other women in the group and the facilitators, and the second including the skills and strategies the women learned for managing anger and negative emotions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651–680.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, J. C., Green, C., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analysis review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023–1053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, J. C., Candy, B. E., Graham, K., & Schart, I. (2007). The evolution of battering interventions: From the dark ages into the scientific age. In J. Hamel & T. Nicholls (Eds.), Family interventions in domestic violence (pp. 215–244). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownlee, K., & Chlebovec, L. (2004). A group for men who abuse their partners: participant perceptions of what was helpful. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 74, 209–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M., & Buttell, F. (2004). A multidimensional evaluation of a treatment program for female batterers: a pilot study. Research on Social Work Practice, 14, 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M., & Buttell, F. (2005). Exploring the relevance of attachment theory as a dependent variable in the treatment of women mandated into treatment for domestic violence offenses. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 41, 33–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M., Buttell, F., & Dutton, D. (2007). Women who perpetrate intimate partner violence: a review of the literature with recommendations for treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 108–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, V. (1999). Misusing phenomenology in nursing research: identifying the issues. Nurse Researcher, 6, 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzon, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Brooklyn: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschner, J., & McNeil, J. (1986). Results of anger control training for battering couples. Journal of Family Violence, 1, 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R., Dobash, R., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Journal of Social Problem, 39, 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, L. (2001). Female perpetrators of partner aggression: relevant issues and treatment. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 5, 73–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G. (1998). The abusive personality: Violence and control in intimate relationships. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flinck, A., Paavilainen, E., & Astedt-Kurki, P. (2008). Intimate partner violence as experienced by men. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 15, 322–327.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (2002). The question of validity in qualitative research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 33, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. (2000). Human subject issues in batterer program evaluation. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment,and Trauma, 4, 273–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondolf, E. W. (2002). Batterer intervention systems: Issues, outcomes and recommendations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. (1964). The idea of phenomenology (trans: Alston, W.P., & Nakhnikian, G.). The Hague, The Netherlands: Nijhoff. (Original work published 1907)

  • Johnson, M. (2006). Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 743–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman, S. (2004). Phenomenology: to wonder and search for meanings. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 40, 61–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krug, E. G., Mercy, J. A., Dahlberg, L. L., & Zwi, A. B. (2002). The world report on violence and health. The Lancet, 5, 1083–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaViolette, A. (2001). Batterers’ treatment: observation from the trenches. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 5(2), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leisring, P., Dowd, L., & Rosenbaum, A. (2003). Treatment of partner aggressive women. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 7, 257–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loseke, D., & Kurz, D. (2005). Men’s violence toward women is the serious social problem. In D. Loseke, R. Gelles, & M. Cavanaugh (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 79–95). California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. L. (2001). The paradox of women arrested for domestic violence. Journal of Violence Against Women, 7(12), 1339–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. (2005). Victims as offenders: The Paradox of women’s violence in relationships. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S., & Meloy, M. (2006). Women’s use of force: voices of women arrested for domestic violence. Journal of Violence Against Women, 12(1), 89–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polit, D. F., & Hungler, B. P. (1999). Nursing research – principles & methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest, H. (2002). An approach to the phenomenological analysis of data. Nurse Researcher, 10(2), 50–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, A., & Leisring, P. A. (2001). Group intervention programs for batterers. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 5(2), 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. S. (2003). Voices from the group: domestic violence offenders’ experience intervention. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 7, 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schore, A. N. (1994). Affect regulation and the origin of the self: The neurobiology of emotional development. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverglied, C., & Mankowski, E. (2006). How batterer intervention programs work: participant and facilitator accounts of processes of change. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonkin, D., & Durphy, M. (1997). Learning to live without violence: A handbook for men. San Francisco: Volcano Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, S. (1980). Women and violence: victims and perpetrators. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 34(3), 334–350.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. (1999). Controversy over domestic violence by women: A methodological, theoretical, and sociology of science analysis. National Institute of Mental Health Report (NCJ 186243). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, S., & Snow, D. (2002). A typology of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Journal of Violence Against Women, 8(3), 286–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, R. E. (1976). A time-out procedure in a public school setting. Psychology in the Schools, 13, 72–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, T. L., McLaughlin, T. F., & Williams, R. L. (2006). Time-out interventions and strategies: a brief review and recommendations. International Journal of Special Education, 21(3), 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation (2011). Intervening with perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A global perspective. ISBN 92 4 159049 1. Retreived from http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/publications/violence/html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tammi Walker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, T. Voices from the Group: Violent Women’s Experiences of Intervention. J Fam Viol 28, 419–426 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9509-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9509-x

Keywords

Navigation