Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 225–231 | Cite as

“Strength at Home” Group Intervention for Military Populations Engaging in Intimate Partner Violence: Pilot Findings

  • Casey T. TaftEmail author
  • Alexandra Macdonald
  • Candice M. Monson
  • Sherry M. Walling
  • Patricia A. Resick
  • Christopher M. Murphy
RESEARCH AND INTERVENTIONS FOR VICTIMS OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE

Abstract

In this brief report, we present information on the Strength at Home intervention to treat male active duty or military veteran perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) as well as preliminary pilot study findings. Strength at Home is a 12-session cognitive-behavioral group intervention developed by the authors that is based on a social information processing model of IPV perpetration. Six men referred to two intervention groups and five collateral female partners participated in this pilot study. Findings indicated large reductions for most indices of physical and psychological IPV from pre-treatment to 6-month follow-up. These initial results are promising though the small sample size and other study limitations preclude our ability to draw firm conclusions.

Keywords

Veterans Domestic Aggression Abuse 

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Anglin, K., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1997). Comparing the responses of maritally violent and nonviolent spouses to problematic marital and nonmarital situations: Are the skill deficits of physically aggressive husbands and wives global? Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 301–313. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.11.3.301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023–1053. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2002.07.00.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blake, D. D., Weathers, F. W., Nagy, L. M., Kaloupek, D. G., Gusman, F. D., Charney, D. S., et al. (1995). The development of a Clinician-Administered PTSD scale. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8, 75–90. doi: 10.1002/jts.2490080106.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calvete, E., Corral, S., & Estévez, A. (2007). Factor structure and validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales for Spanish women. Violence Against Women, 13, 1072–1087. doi: 10.1177/1077801207305933.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chemtob, C. M., Novaco, R. W., Hamada, R. S., Gross, D. M., & Smith, G. (1997). Anger regulation deficits in combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 10, 17–36. doi: 10.1023/A:1024852228908.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coker, A. L., Davis, K. E., Arias, I., Desai, S., Sanderson, M., Brandt, H. M., et al. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23, 260–268. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00514-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Constans, J. I. (2005). Information-processing biases in PTSD. In J. J. Vasterling & C. R. Brewin (Eds.), Neuropsychology of PTSD: Biological, cognitive, and clinical perspectives (pp. 105–130). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dunford, F. W. (2000). The San Diego Navy experiment: An assessment of interventions for men who assault their wives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 468–476. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.68.3.468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eckhardt, C. I. (2011). Intimate partner violence: Cognitive, affective, and relational factors. In J. P. Forgas, A. W. Kruglanski, K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, A. W. Kruglanski, & K. D. Williams (Eds.), The psychology of social conflict and aggression (pp. 167–184). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  12. Eckhardt, C. I., Barbour, K. A., & Davison, G. C. (1998). Articulated thoughts of maritally violent and nonviolent men during anger arousal. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 259–269. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eckhardt, C. I., & Jamison, T. (2002). Articulated thoughts of male dating violence perpetrators during anger arousal. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26, 289–308. doi: 10.1023/A:101604522618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foran, H. M., Slep, A. M., & Heyman, R. E. (2011). Prevalences of intimate partner violence in a representative U.S. Air Force sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 391–397. doi: 10.1037/a0022962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gondolf, E. W. (2002). Batterer intervention systems: Issues, outcomes, and recommendations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Heyman, R. E., & Neidig, P. H. (1999). A comparison of spousal aggression prevalence rates in U.S. army and civilian representative samples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 239–242. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.67.2.239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1992). Social skill deficits in maritally violent men: Interpreting the data using a social information processing model. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 605–617. doi: 10.1016/0272-7358(92)90134-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lawrence, E., Heyman, R. E., & O’Leary, K. D. (1995). Correspondence between telephone and written assessments of physical violence in marriage. Behavior Therapy, 26, 671–680. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80038-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marshall, A. D., Panuzio, J., & Taft, C. T. (2005). Intimate partner violence among military veterans and active duty servicemen. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 862–876. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.05.009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meis, L. A., Barry, R. A., Kehle, S. M., Erbes, C. R., & Polusny, M. A. (2010). Relationship adjustment, PTSD symptoms, and treatment utilization among coupled National Guard soldiers deployed to Iraq. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 560–567. doi: 10.1037/a0020925.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Krueger, R. F., Magdol, L., Margolin, G., Silva, P. A., et al. (1997). Do partners agree about abuse in their relationship?: A psychometric evaluation of interpartner agreement. Psychological Assessment, 9, 47–56. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.9.1.47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murphy, C. M., & Hoover, S. A. (1999). Measuring emotional abuse in dating relationships as a multifactorial construct. Violence and Victims, 14, 39–53. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/springer/vav.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Murphy, C. M., Hoover, S., & Taft, C. (1999). The multidimensional measure of emotional abuse: Factor structure and subscale validity. Toronto, Canada: Paper presented at the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
  24. Novaco, R. W., & Chemtob, C. M. (1998). Anger and trauma: Conceptualization, assessment, and treatment. In V. M. Follette, J. I. Ruzek, & F. R. Abueg (Eds.), Cognitive-behavioral therapies for trauma (pp. 162–190). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Raschmann, J. K., Patterson, J. C., & Schofield, G. (1990). A retrospective study of marital discord in pilots: The USAFSAM experience. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 61, 1145–1148. Retrieved from http://www.asma.org/publications/asem-journal.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sheehan, D. V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K. H., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., et al. (1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59(20), 22–33. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrist.com/default2.asp#.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316. doi: 10.1177/019251396017003001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins College.Google Scholar
  29. Taft, C. T., Murphy, C. M., King, L. A., Dedeyn, J. M., & Musser, P. H. (2005). Posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology among partners of men in treatment for relationship abuse. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 259–268. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.114.2.259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taft, C. T., O’Farrell, T. J., Doron-LaMarca, S., Panuzio, J., Suvak, M. K., Gagnon, D. R., et al. (2010). Longitudinal risk factors for intimate partner violence among men in treatment for alcohol use disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 924–935. doi: 10.1037/a0021093.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taft, C. T., Walling, S. M., Howard, J. M., & Monson, C. (2011). Trauma, PTSD, and partner violence in military families. In S. M. Wadsworth & D. Riggs (Eds.), Risk and resilience in U.S. military families (pp. 195–212). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7064-0_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weathers, F. W., Keane, T. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2001). The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale: A review of the first ten years of research. Depression and Anxiety, 13, 132–156. doi: 10.1002/da.1029.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Casey T. Taft
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Alexandra Macdonald
    • 1
    • 2
  • Candice M. Monson
    • 3
  • Sherry M. Walling
    • 4
  • Patricia A. Resick
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christopher M. Murphy
    • 5
  1. 1.Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System (116B-4)BostonUSA
  2. 2.Boston UniversityBostonUSA
  3. 3.Ryerson UniversityTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Fresno Pacific UniversityFresnoUSA
  5. 5.University of MarylandBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations