Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 235–244 | Cite as

Interventions for Intimate Partner Violence: A Historical Review

Original Article

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV), also known as domestic abuse or relationship violence, has generated a large research literature for the last half-century, particularly in the areas of criminal justice, psychology, and the social sciences. Interventions for victims and perpetrators of IPV have largely been sequestered to separately evolving efforts of law enforcement and the psychotherapeutic community (Chang et al. Women’s Health Issues, 15(1), 21–30, 2005; Dalton Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 15(1), 59–75, 2007; Dobash and Dobash 2000; Feder et al. 2008; Gerbert et al. Journal of Family Practice, 49(10), 889–895, 2000; Wathen and MacMillan. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(5), 589–600, 2003). This article presents a brief overview of the historical evolution and development of these discrete perspectives and identifies and assesses current collaborative interventions rooted in these historical precedents. In conclusion, the authors provide a summative discussion of the most current findings of research into IPV interventions, with a particular focus on the changing roles of race and gender in both the criminal prosecution of IPV and services provided to IPV perpetrators and victims.

Keywords

Batterer programs Intimate partner violence 

References

  1. Austin, J., & Dankwort, J. (1999). Standards for batterer programs: A review and analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(2), 152–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babcock, J., Green, C., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(8), 1023–1053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babcock, J., & LaTaillade, J. (2000). Evaluating interventions for men who batter. In J. Vincent & E. Jouriles (Eds.), Domestic violence: guidelines for research-informed practice (pp. 37–77). Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Babcock, J., & Steiner, R. (1999). The relationship between treatment, incarceration, and recidivism of battering: A program evaluation of Seattle’s coordinated community response to domestic violence. Journal of Family Psychology, 13(1), 46–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bargai, N., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Shalev, A. Y. (2007). Posttraumatic stress disorder and depression in battered women: The mediating role of learned helplessness. Journal of Family Violence, 22(5), 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, L., & Piet, M. (1999). Standards for batterer intervention programs: In whose interest? Violence Against Women, 15(1), 6–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, L., Stoops, C., Call, C., & Flett, H. (2007). Program completion and re-arrest in a batterer intervention system. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(1), 42–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett, L., & Williams, O. (2001). Controversies and recent studies of batterer intervention program effectiveness. Harrisburg: VAWnet, a project of the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence/Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Retrieved July 28, 2009 from: http://www.vawnet.org.Google Scholar
  9. Bograd, M. (2007). Strengthening domestic violence theories: Intersections of race, class, sexual orientation, and gender. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25(3), 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Busch, A., & Rosenberg, M. (2004). Comparing women and men arrested for domestic violence: A preliminary report. Journal of Family Violence, 19(1), 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang, J., Cluss, P., Ranieri, L., Hawker, L., Buranosky, R., Dado, D., et al. (2005). Health care interventions for intimate partner violence: What women want. Women’s Health Issues, 15(1), 21–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cornia, R. (1997). Current use of battered woman syndrome: Institutionalization of negative stereotypes about women. UCLA Women’s Law Journal, 8(1), 99–124.Google Scholar
  13. Corvo, K., Dutton, D., & Chen, W. (2008). Towards evidence-based practice with domestic violence perpetrators. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 16(2), 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corvo, K., & Johnson, P. (2003). Vilification of the “batterer:” How blame shapes domestic violence policy and interventions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8(3), 259–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalton, B. (2007). What’s going on out there? A survey of batterer intervention programs. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 15(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Danis, F. (2003). The criminalization of domestic violence: What social workers need to know. Social Work, 48(2), 237–246.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis, R., Taylor, B., & Maxwell, C. (2000). Does batterer treatment reduce violence? A randomized experiment in Brooklyn. Washington: National Institute of Justice. NCJ 180772.Google Scholar
  18. Detschelt, A. (2003). Recognizing domestic violence directed towards men: Overcoming societal perceptions, conducting accurate studies, and enacting responsible legislation. Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy, 12(2), 249–272.Google Scholar
  19. Dobash, R., & Dobash, R. (1992). Women, violence and social change. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dobash, R., & Dobash, R. (2000). Evaluating criminal justice interventions for domestic violence. Crime & Delinquency, 46(2), 252–270.Google Scholar
  21. Dunford, F. (2000). The San Diego Navy experiment: an assessment of interventions for men who assault their wives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(3), 468–476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunphy, L. (2001). Families on the brink, on the edge. In P. Munhall & V. Fitzsimons (Eds.), The emergence of the family into the 21st century (pp. 3–15). Mississauga: Jones & Barlett Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Dutton, D., & Corvo, K. (2007). The Duluth model: A data-impervious paradigm and a failed strategy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(6), 658–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dutton, D., & Painter, S. (1993). The Battered Woman Syndrome: Effects of severity and intermittency of abuse. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63(4), 614–622.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eckhardt, C., Murphy, C., Black, D., & Suhr, L. (2006). Intervention programs for perpetrators of intimate partner violence: Conclusions from a clinical research perspective. Public Health Reports, 121(4), 369–381.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Eisenberg, A., & Seymour, E. (1979). An overview of legal remedies for battered women: Part II. Trial, 15(10), 42–45, 60–69.Google Scholar
  27. Feder, L., & Forde, D. (2000). A test of the efficacy of court-mandated counseling for domestic violence offenders: The Broward experiment. Washington: National Institute of Justice. NCJ 184752.Google Scholar
  28. Feder, L., Wilson D., & Austin S. (2008). Court-mandated interventions for individuals convicted of domestic violence. Campbell Systematic Reviews 12: The Campbell Collaboration.Google Scholar
  29. Field, C., & Caetano, R. (2005). Intimate partner violence in the U.S. general population: Progress and future directions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(4), 463–469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ford, D., & Regoli, M. (1993). The criminal prosecution of wife assaulters: process, problems, and effects. In N. Z. Hilton (Ed.), Legal responses to wife assault: current trends and evaluation (pp. 127–164). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Gerbert, B., Caspers, N., Milliken, N., Berlin, M., Bronstone, A., & Moe, J. (2000). Interventions that help victims of domestic violence: A qualitative analysis of physician’s experiences. The Journal of Family Practice, 49(10), 889–895.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gondolf, E. (1999). A comparison of four batterer intervention systems. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(1), 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gondolf, E., & Williams, O. (2001). Culturally focused batterer counseling for African American men. Truama, Violence and Abuse, 2(4), 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goodman, L., & Epstein, D. (2005). Refocusing on women: A new direction for policy and research on intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(4), 479–487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grauwiler, P., & Mills, L. (2004). Moving beyond the criminal justice paradigm: A radical restorative justice approach to intimate abuse. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 31(1), 49–69.Google Scholar
  36. Hamberger, L. K., & Guse, C. E. (2002). Men’s and women’s use of intimate partner violence in clinical samples. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1301–1331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hampton, R., LaTaillade, J., Dacey, A., & Marghi, J. (2008). Evaluating domestic violence interventions for black women. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 16(3), 330–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Han, E. (2003). Mandatory arrest and no-drop policies: Victim empowerment in domestic violence cases. Boston College Third World Law Journal, 23(1), 159–192.Google Scholar
  39. Hanna, C. (1996). No right to choose: Mandated victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions. Harvard Law Review, 109(8), 1849–1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hanna, C. (1998). The paradox of hope: The crime and punishment of domestic violence. William & Mary Law Review, 39(5), 1505–1584.Google Scholar
  41. Hiroto, D. S., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Generality of learned helplessness in man. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 311–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hirschel, D., Buzawa, E., Pattavǐna, A., & Faggiani, D. (2008). Domestic violence and mandatory arrest laws: To what extent do they influence police arrest decisions? The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 98(1), 255–298.Google Scholar
  43. Kimmel, M. S. (2002). “Gender symmetry” in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence Against Women, 8(11), 1332–1363.Google Scholar
  44. Lemon, N. (2009). Domestic violence law (3rd ed.). St. Paul: West Group.Google Scholar
  45. Lockhart, L., White, B., Causby, V., & Tsaac, A. (1994). Letting out the secret: Violence in lesbian relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9(4), 469–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Martin, D. (1976). Battered wives. San Francisco: Glide Publications.Google Scholar
  47. Mills, L. (1998). Mandatory arrest and prosecution policies for domestic violence: A critical literature review and the case for more research to test victim empowerment approaches. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25(3), 306–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mills, L. (1999). Killing her softly: Intimate abuse and the violence of state intervention. Harvard Law Review, 113(2), 550–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. National Institute of Justice. (1998). Batterer intervention: program approaches and criminal justice strategies. Washington: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
  50. National Institute of Justice. (2003). Do batterer intervention programs work? Two studies. Washington: Author.Google Scholar
  51. Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth Model. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. Pence, E., & Shepard, M. (1999). Developing a coordinated community response: An introduction. In M. Shepard & E. Pence (Eds.), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from the Duluth Model (pp. 3–23). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Rosenfeld, B. (1992). Court-ordered treatment of spouse abuse. Clinical Psychology Review, 12(2), 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rothenberg, B. (2003). ‘We don’t have time for social change:’ Cultural compromise and the Battered Woman Syndrome. Gender and Society, 17(5), 771–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Russell, B. (2010). Battered Woman Syndrome as a legal defense: History, effectiveness and implications. Jefferson: McFarland & Company.Google Scholar
  56. Sartin, R., Hansen, D., & Huss, M. (2006). Domestic violence treatment response and recidivism: A review and implications for the study of family violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(5), 425–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Savage, J. (2006). Battered woman syndrome. Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law, 7(3), 761–770.Google Scholar
  58. Schechter, S. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the Battered Women’s Movement. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  59. Schechter, S. (1988). Building bridges between activists, professionals, and researchers. In K. Yllo & M. Bograde (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 299–312). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Shepard, M. (2005). Twenty years of progress in addressing domestic violence: An agenda for the next ten. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(4), 436–441.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sherman, L., & Berk, R. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 261–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stannard, M. (2009). Domestic violence groups get federal funds. San Francisco Chronicle (San Francisco, CA), p. A-11, August 7.Google Scholar
  63. State v. Koss (1990), 49 Ohio St. 3d 213.Google Scholar
  64. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2006). Bargaining in the shadow of the law: Divorce laws and family distress. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1), 267–288.Google Scholar
  65. Stover, C. (2005). Domestic violence research: What have we learned and where do we go from here? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(4), 448–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Straus, M., & Gelles, R. (1990). How violent are American families? Estimates from the national family violence resurvey and other studies. In M. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 95–112). New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  67. Stuart, G., Temple, J., & Moore, T. (2007). Improving batterer intervention programs through theory-based research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298(5), 560–562.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Swan, S., & Snow, D. (2002). A typology of women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. Violence Against Women, 8(3), 286–319.Google Scholar
  69. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Research Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. NCJ 183781.Google Scholar
  70. United States Department of Justice. (1996, May). The Validity and Use of Evidence Concerning Battering and Its Effects in Criminal Trials. NCJ 160972. Retrieved December 29, 2010 from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/batter.pdf.
  71. Walker, L. (2000). The Battered Woman Syndrome (2nd ed.). New York: Springer Publishing.Google Scholar
  72. Wathen, C., & MacMillan, H. (2003). Interventions for violence against women. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(5), 589–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Williams, O. (1994). Group work with African American men who batter: Toward more ethnically sensitive practice. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 25(1), 91–103.Google Scholar
  74. Williams, O., & Becker, L. (1994). Partner abuse programs and cultural competence: The results of a national study. Violence and Victims, 9(3), 287–295.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Georgia School of Social WorkAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations