Work-Home Conflict and Domestic Violence: A Test of a Conceptual Model
- 245 Downloads
The relationship between work-home conflict and domestic violence is examined using data from 295 adults, who worked full time and were in serious relationships. Job satisfaction, gender, gender role attitudes, type of employment, and socioeconomic status were examined as predictors of work-family conflict. Backward stepwise regression analysis revealed that job satisfaction was the only predictor of work-home conflict. Regression analyses were again conducted to determine the moderating effects of general well-being, alcohol use, family of origin violence witnessed or experienced, communication skills, and social support on the relationship between work-home conflict and domestic violence. Both family of origin violence witnessed and personally experienced were revealed as moderators of this relationship. The remaining potential moderators were submitted to regression analyses to determine if they might, instead, be mediators. These analyses revealed that negative communication skills and social support mediated the relationship between work-home conflict and domestic violence.
KeywordsWork-home conflict Work-family conflict Domestic violence Family violence Intimate partner violence
- Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning.Google Scholar
- Barnett, O., Miller-Perrin, C., & Perrin, R. (2005). Family violence across the lifespan. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. E. (1999). Self-esteem and partner violence: A Meta-analytic review. Paper presented at the Sixth International family Violence Research Conference, Durham, NH.Google Scholar
- Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2002). Occupational Classification System Manual. Retrieved October 2, 2006, from http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/ocsm/commain.htm.
- Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., & Hoberman, H. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In I. G. Sarason & B. R. Sarason (Eds.), Social support: theory, research, and application (pp. 73–94). The Hague, Holland: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Gelles, R. (1994). Family violence, abuse, and neglect. In P. McHenry & S. Price (Eds.), Families and change: coping with stressful events (pp. 262–280). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hesse-Biber, S., & Carter, G. L. (2000). Working women in America: split dreams. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hines, D. A., & Malley-Morrison, K. (2005). Family violence in the United States. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hollingshead, A. B. (1957). Two factor index of social position. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
- Hoyle, R., & Robinson, J. (2003). Mediated and moderated effects in social psychological Research: measurement, design, and analysis issues. In C. Sansone, C. Morf & A. T. Panter (Eds.), Handbook of methods in social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Johnson, M. (2000). Conflict and control: images of symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. In A. Booth, A. C. Crouter & M. Clements (Eds.), Couples in conflict. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Kantor, G., & Jasinski, J. (1998). Dynamics and risk factors in partner violence. In J. Jasinski & L. Williams (Eds.), Partner violence: A comprehensive review of 20 years of research, 1–43.Google Scholar
- Kenny, D. A. (2006). Mediation. Retrieved January 7, 2007, from http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm.
- Mantsios, G. (2004). Class in America–2003. In P. S. Rothberg (Ed.), Race, class and gender in the United States (6th ed., pp. 193–206). New York: Worth.Google Scholar
- Mignon, S., Larson, C., & Holmes, W. (2002). Family abuse: consequences, theories, and responses. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Padavic, I., & Reskin, B. (2002). Women and men at work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Partnership for Prevention. (2002). Domestic violence and the workplace. Washington, D.C.: Partnership for Prevention.Google Scholar
- Preacher, K., & Leonardelli, G. (2006). Calculation for the Sobel test. Retrieved January 7, 2007, from http://www.psych.ku.edu/preacher/sobel/sobel.htm.
- Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de le Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT). WHO Collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption—II. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 88, 791–804. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.Google Scholar
- Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). Washington, D.C.: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
- Straus, M. (1990). Social stress and marital violence in a national sample of American families. In M. Straus & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8, 145 families (pp. 181–202). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
- Straus, M. (2004). Scoring the CTS2 and CTSPC. Retrieved September 1, 2006 from http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/CTS28a3.pdf.
- Straus, M., Gelles, R., & Steinmetz, S. (1980). Behind closed doors: violence in the American family. Garden City, NJ: Anchor.Google Scholar
- Wallen, J. (2002). Balancing work and family: the role of the workplace. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Warr, P. (1990). The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 193–210.Google Scholar
- Widom, C. S., & Maxfield, M. G. (2001). An update on the “Cycle of Violence” (NCJ Publication No. 184894). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar