Perceived Risk for Future Intimate Partner Violence among Women in a Domestic Violence Shelter

Abstract

Research investigating women’s risk assessments for intimate partner violence (IPV) shows that women can predict future violence with relative accuracy. Limited research has investigated factors that are associated with perceived risk and the potential behavioral consequences of victim risk perception. Results from a survey of women in a domestic violence shelter (N = 56) indicated that women perceive lower risk of future violence if the abusive relationship were to end and higher risk of violence if it were to continue. Certain abuse experiences were related to elevated perceptions of personal risk for future violence. Further, perceived personal risk predicted the women’s intention to terminate their relationship upon leaving shelter. Results are discussed as they may inform interventions preventing IPV.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term ‘risk assessment’ is currently the term of choice in intimate partner violence research, while other literatures (e.g. health behavior research) use the term ‘risk perception’. The current study suggests that these two terms address the same fundamental concept; a subjective feeling of being at risk for an event, and thus, the terms will be used interchangeably.

References

  1. Anderson, D. J. (2003). The impact on subsequent violence of returning to an abusive partner. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 34, 93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, M. A., Gillig, P. M., Sitaker, M., McCloskey, K., Malloy, K., & Grigsby, N. (2003). “Why doesn’t she just leave?”: A descriptive study of victim reported impediments to her safety. Journal of Family Violence, 18, 151–155. doi:10.1023/A:1023564404773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Arias, I., & Corso, P. (2005). Average cost per person victimized by an intimate partner of the opposite gender: A comparison of men and women. Violence and Victims, 20, 379–391. doi:10.1891/vivi.2005.20.4.379.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bell, M. E., Goodman, L. A., & Dutton, M. A. (2007). The dynamics of staying and leaving: Implications for battered women’s emotional well-being and experiences of violence at the end of a year. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 413–428. doi:10.1007/s10896-007-9096-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brewer, N. T., Weinstein, N. D., Cuite, C. L., & Herrington, J. F. (2004). Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27, 125–130. doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2702_7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., McCaul, K. D., & Weinstein, N. D. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 136–145. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown, A. L., Messman-Moore, T. L., Miller, A. G., & Stasser, G. (2005). Sexual victimization in relation to perceptions of risk: Mediation, generalization, and temporal stability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 963–976. doi:10.1177/0146167204274101.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell, J., Sharps, P., & Glass, N. (2001). Risk assessment for intimate partner homicide. In: G. F. Pinard & L. Pagani (Eds.), Clinical assessment of dangerousness. Cambridge University Press, Cambrige, pp. 136–157.

  10. Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., et al. (2003). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089–1097.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cattaneo, L. (2007). Contributors to assessments of risk in intimate partner violence: How victims and professionals differ. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 57–75. doi:10.1002/jcop.20134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cattaneo, L., & Goodman, L. (2003). Victim-reported risk factors for continued abusive behavior: Assessing the dangerousness of arrested batterers. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 349–369. doi:10.1002/jcop.10056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cattaneo, L., & Goodman, L. (2005). Risk factors for re-abuse in intimate partner violence: A cross disciplinary critical review. Trauma, Violence and Abuse: A Review Journal, 6, 141–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cattaneo, L., Bell, M. E., Goodman, L. A., & Dutton, M. A. (2007). Intimate partner violence victims’ accuracy in assessing their risk of re-abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 429–440. doi:10.1007/s10896-007-9097-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gondolf, E. W., & Heckert, D. A. (2003). Determinants of women’s perceptions of risk in battering relationships. Violence and Victims, 18, 371–386. doi:10.1891/vivi.2003.18.4.371.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heckert, D. A., & Gondolf, E. W. (2004). Battered women’s perceptions of risk versus risk factors and instruments in predicting repeat assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 778–799. doi:10.1177/0886260504265619.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Helweg-Larsen, M. (1999). (The lack of) optimistic biases in response to the 1994 Northridge earthquake: The role of personal experience. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Helweg-Larsen, M., & Shepperd, J. A. (2001). Do moderators of the optimistic bias affect personal or target risk estimates? A review of the literature. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 74–95. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0501_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Helweg-Larsen, M., Harding, H., & Kleinman, K. (2008). Risk perceptions of dating violence among college women: The role of experience and depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 600–620. doi:10.1521/jscp.2008.27.6.600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hendy, H. M., Eggen, D., Gustitus, C., McLeod, K. C., & Ng, P. (2003). Decision to leave scale: Perceived reasons to stay in or leave violent relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 162–173. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kernsmith, P. (2006). Gender differences in the impact of family of origin violence on perpetrators of domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 21, 163–171. doi:10.1007/s10896-005-9014-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Krause, E. D., Kaltman, S., Goodman, L. A., & Dutton, M. A. (2006). Role of distinct PTSD symptoms in intimate partner reabuse: A prospective study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19, 507–516. doi:10.1002/jts.20136.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marshall, A. D., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2002). Varying forms of husband sexual aggression: Predictors and subgroup differences. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 286–296. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.16.3.286.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Martin, A. J., Berenson, K. R., Griffing, S., Sage, R. E., Madry, L., Bingham, L. E., & Primm, B. J. (2000). The process of leaving an abusive relationship: The role of risk assessments and decision-certainty. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 109–121. doi:10.1023/A:1007515514298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nicolaidis, C., Curry, M., Ulrich, Y., Sharps, P., McFarlane, J., Campbell, D., et al. (2003). Could we have known? A qualitative analysis of data from women who survived an attempted homicide by an intimate partner. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18, 788–794. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21202.x.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scale (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316. doi:10.1177/019251396017003001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the National Violence against Women Survey (Publication No. NCJ 181867). Washington, DC: Department of Justice.

  28. Weinstein, N. D. (1988). The precaution adoption process. Health Psychology, 7, 355–386. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.7.4.355.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Weinstein, N. D. (1989). Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 31–50. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.31.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Weinstein, N. D., & Nicholich, M. (1993). Correct and incorrect interpretations between risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Health Psychology, 12, 235–245. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.12.3.235.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Weinstein, N. D., Rothmanm, A. J., & Nicholich, M. (1998). Use of correlational data to examine the effects of risk perceptions on precautionary behavior. Psychology & Health, 13, 479–501. doi:10.1080/08870449808407305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Weinstein, N. D., Kwitel, A., McCaul, K. D., Magnan, R. E., Gerrard, M., & Gibbons, F. X. (2007). Risk perceptions: Assessment and relationship to influenza vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 146–151. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.146.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Weisz, A. N., Tolman, R. M., & Saunders, D. G. (2000). Assessing the risk of severe domestic violence: The importance of survivors’ predictions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 75–90. doi:10.1177/088626000015001006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wilson, M., Daly, M., & Wright, C. (1993). Uxoricide in Canada: Demographic risk patterns. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 35, 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilary G. Harding.

Additional information

This research was supported by Dickinson College and by (while serving at) the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Data from the study was presented at the 2007 Society for Personality and Social Psychology Conference in Memphis, TN. The authors would like to thank Joan Jackson for comments on an earlier draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harding, H.G., Helweg-Larsen, M. Perceived Risk for Future Intimate Partner Violence among Women in a Domestic Violence Shelter. J Fam Viol 24, 75 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-008-9211-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Intimate partner violence
  • Risk perception
  • Relationship decisions
  • Domestic violence shelters