Advertisement

Journal of Family Violence

, 23:671 | Cite as

Intimate Partner Violence within the Chinese Community in San Francisco: Problem Gambling as a Risk Factor

  • Michael S. Liao
Original Article

Abstract

A total of 31 Chinese community members (8 males and 23 females) were recruited from three social service agencies in San Francisco (Donaldina Cameron House, Richmond Area Multi-Services, and St. Mary’s Chinese Center) to participate in a study examining the relationship between problem gambling and intimate partner violence (IPV). A survey approach was taken which assessed the participants’ demographic characteristics including age, gender, country of birth, and employment, as well as factors relating to their intimate partners, including partner’s alcohol abuse and problem gambling. Younger participants and those whose partners were problem gamblers were more likely to experience IPV. However, partner’s problem gambling was a significant predictor only at the ten-point cutoff on the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) (Lesieur and Blume, American Journal of Psychiatry, 1987) and not at the five-point cutoff. Chinese participants whose partners were problem gamblers (SOGS ≥ 10) were 27.5 times more likely to experience IPV. Findings are discussed and social work practice, policy, and research implications are highlighted.

Keywords

Problem gambling Intimate partner violence Chinese San Francisco 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research paper was submitted to the School of Social Work at the University of California Berkeley in partial fulfillment of the degree of Master in Social Work. Thanks to Julia Hastings, Ph.D. and Julian Chow, Ph.D. who served as the faculty advisors, and thanks to Kent Woo, MSW, who served as the agency advisor.

References

  1. Barlin, J., O, , Leary, K. D., Jouriles, E. N., Vivian, D., & MacEwen, K. E. (1987). Factor similarity of the Conflict Tactics Scales across samples, spouses, and sites: Issues and implications. Journal of Family Violence, 2, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernard, H. R. (1994). Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches pp. (pp. 71–101). Walnut Creek: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blaszczynski, A., Huynh, S., Dumlao, V. J., & Farrell, E. (1998). Problem gambling within a Chinese-speaking community. Journal of Gambling Studies, 14, 359–380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bush, K., Kivlahan, D. R., McDonell, M. B., Fihn, S. D., & Bradley, K. A. (1998). The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Archives Internal Medicine, 158, 1789–1795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., et al. (2003). Risk factors for femicides in abusive relationships: Results from a multisite case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089–1097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, R. (1991). Relationship between marital violence characteristics and family dynamics in Talwan: A study of 25 cases. In F. M. Cheung, P. W. Wan, H. I. C. Choi, & L. M. Choy (Eds.), Selected papers on conference on gender studies in Chinese societies (pp. 279–303). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Grisso, J. A., Wishner, A. R., Schwarz, D. F., Weene, B. A., Holmes, J. H., & Sutton, R. L. (1991). A population-based study of injuries in inner-city women. American Journal Of Epidemiology, 134, 59–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kellermann, A. L., & Mercy, J. A. (1992). Men, women, and murder: gender-specific differences in rates of fatal violence and victimization. Journal of Trauma, 33, 1–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kyriacou, D. N., Anglin, D., Taliaferro, E., Stone, S., Tubb, T., Linden, J. A., et al. (1999). Risk Factors for injury to women from domestic violence. New England Journal of Medicine, 341, 1892–1898.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Leung, S. F., & Arthur, D. (2000). The alcohol use identification test (AUDIT): Validation of an instrument for enhancing nursing practice in Hong Kong. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 37, 57–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks gambling screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lorenz, V. C., & Shuttlesworth, D. E. (1983). The impact of pathologic gambling on the spouse of the gambler. Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marin, G., & Marin Vanoss, B. (1991). Research with Hispanic Populations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Muelleman, R. L., DenOtter, T., Wadman, M. C., Tran, T. P., & Anderson, J. (2002). Problem gambling in the partner of the emergency department patient as a risk factor for intimate partner violence. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 23, 307–312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. National Gambling Impact Study Commission (1999). The National Gambling Impact Study Commission. Washington, DC: National Gambling Impact Study Commission.Google Scholar
  17. National Institute of Justice Center for Disease Control and Prevention (1998). Prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the national violence against women survey (NCJ 172837). Washington DC: Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N.Google Scholar
  18. NICOS Chinese Health Coalition (1997). Chinese community health study. San Francisco: Author.Google Scholar
  19. Parish, W. L., Wang, T., Laumann, E. O., Pan, S., & Luo, Y. (2004). Intimate partner violence in China: National prevalence, risk factors and associated health problems. International Family Planning Perspectives, 30, 174–181.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Petry, N. M., Armentano, C., Kouch, T., Norinth, T., & Smith, L. (2003). Gambling participation and problems among Southeast Asian refugees to the United States. Psychiatric Services, 54, 1142–1148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (1992). Designing and conducting survey research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Saunders, J. B., Aasland, O. G., Babor, T. F., de la Fuente, J. R., & Grant, M. (1993). Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption–II. Addiction, 88, 791–804.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Vander Bilt, J. (1997). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling behavior in the United States and Canada: a meta-analysis. Boston: Harvard Medical School, Division of Addictions.Google Scholar
  24. Shields, A. L., & Caruso, J. C. (2003). Reliability generalization of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stinchfield, R. (2002). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Addictive Behaviors, 27, 1–19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tang, C. S. (1994). Prevalence of spouse aggression in Hong Kong. Journal of Family Violence, 9, 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tang, C. S. (1999). Wife abuse in Hong Kong Chinese families: A community survey. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tang, C. S., Wong, D., Cheung, F. M. C., & Lee, A. (2000). Exploring how Chinese define violence against women: A focus group study in Hong Kong. Women’s Studies International Forum, 23, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tsai, M. C., Tsai, Y. F., Chen, C. Y., & Liu, C. Y. (2005). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): Establishment of cut-off scores in a hospitalized Chinese population. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29, 53–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). American FactFinder fact sheet: San Francisco County, California. Selected population group: Chinese alone. Retrieved May 6, 2007 from http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/SAFFIteratedFacts?_event = &geo_id = 05000US06075 &_geoContext=01000US%7C04000US06%7C05000US06075&_street=&_county=San+Francisco+County&_cityTown=&_state=04000US06&_zip=&_lang=en&_sse=on&Acti veGeoDiv=&_useEV=&pctxt=fph&pgsl=050&_submenuId=factsheet_2&ds_name=DE C_2000_SAFF&_ci_nbr=016&qr_name=DEC_2000_SAFF_R1050&reg=DEC_2000_S AFF_R1050%3A016&_keyword=&_industry=/servlet/SAFFIteratedFacts?_event = &geo_id = 05000US06075 &_geoContext=01000US%7C04000US06%7C05000US06075&_street=&_county=San+Francisco+County&_cityTown=&_state=04000US06&_zip=&_lang=en&_sse=on&Acti veGeoDiv=&_useEV=&pctxt=fph&pgsl=050&_submenuId=factsheet_2&ds_name=DE C_2000_SAFF&_ci_nbr=016&qr_name=DEC_2000_SAFF_R1050&reg=DEC_2000_S AFF_R1050%3A016&_keyword=&_industry=
  32. Yick, A. G. (2000). Predictors of physical spousal/intimate violence in Chinese American families. Journal of Family Violence, 15, 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chinese Community Problem Gambling ProjectNICOS Chinese Health CoalitionSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations